Buy Now, Pay Later Cost Disclosure and Consumer Payment Choice: Evidence from a Randomized Field Experiment in Retail Stores - Phase 2: Loyalty Bonus Disclosure for Immediate Payment

Last registered on July 27, 2026

Pre-Trial

Trial Information

General Information

Title
Buy Now, Pay Later Cost Disclosure and Consumer Payment Choice: Evidence from a Randomized Field Experiment in Retail Stores - Phase 2: Loyalty Bonus Disclosure for Immediate Payment
RCT ID
AEARCTR-0019172
Initial registration date
July 26, 2026

Initial registration date is when the trial was registered.

It corresponds to when the registration was submitted to the Registry to be reviewed for publication.

First published
July 27, 2026, 7:18 AM EDT

First published corresponds to when the trial was first made public on the Registry after being reviewed.

Locations

Region

Primary Investigator

Affiliation

Other Primary Investigator(s)

PI Affiliation

Additional Trial Information

Status
In development
Start date
2026-07-27
End date
2026-08-23
Secondary IDs
Prior work
This trial is based on or builds upon one or more prior RCTs.
Abstract
This study tests whether offering and disclosing a loyalty bonus for immediate payment at the point of sale affects consumers' payment choices and purchasing behavior. It constitutes the second phase of a two-phase randomized field experiment; the first phase is registered under AEARCTR-0018591. In the treatment condition, sales staff inform each customer, before the payment decision is finalized, that paying the full purchase amount immediately — rather than using an installment or buy-now-pay-later (BNPL) plan — entitles the customer to a 15% loyalty bonus credited to a loyalty account. The listed price is identical across payment methods, so the incentive operates solely through the bonus.

In the control condition, stores follow the standard price presentation and sales process, and no bonus is offered or disclosed. The primary outcome is the share of purchases paid in full immediately rather than through installment/BNPL plans. Secondary outcomes include total sales, average transaction value, conversion, product mix, and returns where available.

Phase 2 will be conducted over four weeks, from July 27, 2026 to August 23, 2026, in the same three comparable retail stores as Phase 1. In each store, full business days are randomly assigned to the treatment or control condition, stratified by day of the week.
External Link(s)

Registration Citation

Citation
Akebayev, Dastan and Birzhan Batkeyev. 2026. "Buy Now, Pay Later Cost Disclosure and Consumer Payment Choice: Evidence from a Randomized Field Experiment in Retail Stores - Phase 2: Loyalty Bonus Disclosure for Immediate Payment." AEA RCT Registry. July 27. https://doi.org/10.1257/rct.19172-1.0
Experimental Details

Interventions

Intervention(s)
The intervention consists of a standardized verbal disclosure at the point of sale. On treatment days, sales staff are trained to inform each customer, before the payment method is finalized, that immediate full payment — by cash or by card without an installment plan — entitles the customer to a 15% loyalty bonus, whereas installment/BNPL payment does not. The listed price does not depend on the payment method; only the loyalty bonus is conditional on it. Staff are instructed to state the bonus terms neutrally and not to recommend either payment option.
Intervention (Hidden)
Design Overview

This study is Phase 2 of a randomized field experiment conducted in the same three comparable retail stores as Phase 1 (AEARCTR-0018591), over a four-week period from July 27, 2026 to August 23, 2026. All three stores follow a within-store randomization design in which entire business days are assigned to the treatment or control condition. Relative to Phase 1, two elements change: the content of the intervention, from disclosure of the full installment cost to disclosure of a 15% loyalty bonus for immediate payment, and the randomization scheme, from a combination of between-store assignment and half-day blocks to day-level randomization applied uniformly across all stores.

Store Selection

The stores are those used in Phase 1, originally selected for their similarity in traffic volume and patterns, store format and size, average transaction value, product mix, historical sales trends, and historical share of installment/BNPL purchases.

Randomization Scheme

Within each store, business days are randomly assigned to the treatment or control condition according to a schedule generated before the start of the intervention. The randomization is stratified by day of the week: for each store, each weekday (Monday through Sunday) is assigned to the treatment condition on exactly two of the four study weeks and to the control condition on the remaining two. This stratification guarantees an exact 50/50 split of treatment and control days within each store and balanced coverage of weekday- and weekend-specific traffic patterns. The full schedule comprises 84 store-days (3 stores × 28 days), of which 42 are treatment store-days and 42 are control store-days. The schedule was generated with a fixed random seed (7212026) and is committed prior to the intervention; it is not altered during the study period.

Treatment Condition

On treatment days, sales staff follow a standardized verbal script informing each customer, before the payment decision, that immediate full payment qualifies for a 15% loyalty bonus and that installment/BNPL payment does not. The script is purely informational: staff state the bonus terms without persuasive or evaluative language and do not recommend one payment option over another.

Control Condition

On control days, all stores continue their standard pricing communication and sales process. No loyalty bonus tied to the payment method is offered or disclosed.

Data Collection

Each transaction is tagged with store ID, date, treatment/control status of the day, payment method, transaction value, product category, and, where available, seller ID and an indicator of whether the loyalty bonus was applied.

Outcomes

The primary outcome is the share of purchases paid in full immediately rather than through installment/BNPL plans. Secondary outcomes include average transaction value, total sales volume, product category composition, and returns where available.

Analytical Approach

The primary analysis compares transactions on treatment and control days within stores, using regressions with store and day-of-week fixed effects and standard errors clustered at the store-day level, the unit of randomization. Additional specifications control for calendar week, product category, and other available transaction characteristics. Pre-intervention data, including Phase 1 data collected under AEARCTR-0018591, may be used to assess baseline comparability and improve precision.
Intervention Start Date
2026-07-27
Intervention End Date
2026-08-23

Primary Outcomes

Primary Outcomes (end points)
Share of purchases paid in full immediately rather than via installment/BNPL payment.
Primary Outcomes (explanation)
The primary outcome is the proportion of completed transactions in which the customer pays the full purchase amount immediately rather than choosing an installment/BNPL plan. Immediate payment covers cash, card, and any other non-installment payment method; installment/BNPL payment covers BNPL products and equivalent installment-based options offered at the point of sale.

Construction

The outcome is constructed from transaction-level sales data. The following variables are recorded for each completed transaction:

Transaction ID: unique identifier of the purchase
Payment method: immediate payment vs. installment/BNPL payment
Store ID
Date: linking each transaction to its assigned experimental condition
Treatment/control status: assigned at the store-day level
Loyalty bonus indicator: whether the bonus was applied, where available
Product category and transaction value, where available

At the transaction level, the outcome is defined as Immediate = 1 if the transaction is paid in full immediately, and Immediate = 0 if it is paid via an installment/BNPL plan. The immediate-payment share is the number of immediate-payment transactions divided by the total number of completed transactions, and can be computed by day, store, or experimental condition.

Interpretation

A statistically significant increase in the immediate-payment share on treatment days relative to control days would be interpreted as evidence that a loyalty bonus for immediate payment shifts consumers' payment choices away from installment/BNPL plans.

Secondary Outcomes

Secondary Outcomes (end points)
Secondary outcomes include:

Average transaction value
Total sales volume
Number of completed transactions
Product category composition and product shifts
Conversion rate, if customer traffic or store-visit data are available
Returns, if available
Loyalty bonus accrual and redemption, where available
Secondary Outcomes (explanation)

Experimental Design

Experimental Design
Overview
This study is a randomized controlled field experiment evaluating whether a loyalty bonus for immediate payment, disclosed at the point of sale, affects customer payment choice and purchasing behavior in a retail setting. It is the second phase of the experiment registered under AEARCTR-0018591 and is conducted over four weeks in the same three retail stores.

Control Condition
In the control store and control time blocks, standard pricing communication remains in place, and no payment-method-contingent loyalty bonus is offered or disclosed.

Baseline Period
Data collected before the start of Phase 2, prior to July 20, 2026 - including data from Phase 1 (AEARCTR-0018591) - are used to assess baseline comparability across stores and to support the difference-in-differences analysis.

Unit of Analysis
The unit of analysis is the individual transaction.

External Validity
The study is conducted in a small number of comparable retail stores within one geographic area. Given the limited sample of stores and the specific retail context, external validity will be interpreted cautiously. The main objective of this phase is to obtain internally valid evidence on whether a loyalty bonus for immediate payment affects payment choice and purchasing behavior in the participating stores.
The study will be conducted in the same three retail stores as Phase 1.
The primary unit of observation is the individual transaction, and the realized number of transaction-level observations will be reported after data collection for the July 20 - August 20, 2026 study period.
Experimental Design Details
Within-Store Day-Level Randomization

All three stores follow the same within-store design. In each store, every business day of the four-week study period is randomly assigned to either the treatment condition, in which the loyalty bonus is offered and disclosed, or the control condition, in which standard operations continue unchanged. Assignment is made at the level of the full business day, so each store alternates between treatment and control days according to its randomized schedule and serves as its own control.

Stratification and Balance

The randomization is stratified by day of the week within each store: every weekday appears in the treatment condition in exactly two of the four study weeks and in the control condition in the other two. As a result, each store contributes 14 treatment days and 14 control days, and treatment and control conditions are equally represented across all days of the week, including weekends. The complete schedule consists of 84 store-days, split evenly between the two conditions. It was generated with a fixed random seed before the start of the intervention and remains unchanged throughout the study.

Control Condition

On control days, standard pricing communication remains in place, and no payment-method-contingent loyalty bonus is offered or disclosed.

Baseline Period

Data collected before July 27, 2026 — including data from Phase 1 (AEARCTR-0018591) — are used to assess baseline comparability across stores and to support supplementary analyses.

Unit of Randomization

Store-day (full business day within a store).

Unit of Analysis

The unit of analysis is the individual transaction, with standard errors clustered at the store-day level.

External Validity

The study is conducted in a small number of comparable retail stores within one geographic area. Given the limited sample of stores and the specific retail context, external validity will be interpreted cautiously. The main objective of this phase is to obtain internally valid evidence on whether a loyalty bonus for immediate payment affects payment choice and purchasing behavior in the participating stores.

The study will be conducted in the same three retail stores as Phase 1. The primary unit of observation is the individual transaction, and the realized number of transaction-level observations will be reported after data collection for the four-week study period.

Sample size: planned number of clusters

84 store-day clusters (3 stores × 28 business days), randomly assigned within stores with stratification by day of the week: 42 treatment days and 42 control days, 14 of each per store.

Sample size: planned number of observations

Approximately 1,200 completed transaction-level observations over the four-week study period, based on realized volumes in Phase 1; the final number will depend on realized sales.

Sample size (or number of clusters) by treatment arms

42 treatment store-days and 42 control store-days across 3 retail stores; approximately 600 transactions per arm, subject to realized sales.
Randomization Method
Lottery
Randomization Unit
Retail stores
Was the treatment clustered?
Yes

Experiment Characteristics

Sample size: planned number of clusters
3 stores total. All three stores follow a within-store design: in each store, 28 full business days over the four-week period from July 27, 2026 to August 23, 2026 are randomly assigned to treatment or control, stratified by day of the week and split 50/50 between the two conditions. This yields 84 store-day clusters in total.
Sample size: planned number of observations
3 retail stores
Sample size (or number of clusters) by treatment arms
3 retail stores; 84 store-day clusters in total, of which 42 are treatment days and 42 are control days (14 of each per store); approximately 1,200 completed transaction-level observations over the four-week period, with roughly 600 transactions per arm, subject to realized sales.
Minimum detectable effect size for main outcomes (accounting for sample design and clustering)
IRB

Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)

IRB Name
IRB Approval Date
IRB Approval Number

Post-Trial

Post Trial Information

Study Withdrawal

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information

Intervention

Is the intervention completed?
No
Data Collection Complete
Data Publication

Data Publication

Is public data available?
No

Program Files

Program Files
Reports, Papers & Other Materials

Relevant Paper(s)

Reports & Other Materials