Economic Rationality of People with Substance Use Disorder

Last registered on July 23, 2026

Pre-Trial

Trial Information

General Information

Title
Economic Rationality of People with Substance Use Disorder
RCT ID
AEARCTR-0019182
Initial registration date
July 20, 2026

Initial registration date is when the trial was registered.

It corresponds to when the registration was submitted to the Registry to be reviewed for publication.

First published
July 23, 2026, 8:13 AM EDT

First published corresponds to when the trial was first made public on the Registry after being reviewed.

Locations

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information

Primary Investigator

Affiliation
Southwestern University of Finance and Economics

Other Primary Investigator(s)

PI Affiliation
Kyung Hee University
PI Affiliation
Sichuan Tourism University
PI Affiliation
Chengdu Normal University

Additional Trial Information

Status
On going
Start date
2026-07-13
End date
2026-08-02
Secondary IDs
Prior work
This trial does not extend or rely on any prior RCTs.
Abstract
Addiction remains a significant global public health challenge, highlighting an urgent need for more advanced behavioral and biological methodologies to accurately assess addiction severity and evaluate the effectiveness of rehabilitation interventions. Despite rigorous anti-drug regulations in China, which currently has more than one million officially registered people with substance use disorder (PwSUD), there remain substantial opportunities for improvement in treatment and preventive strategies.

This methodological gap underscores the necessity of developing innovative behavioral strategies and predictive models that can enhance recovery and prevent relapse in substance abuse treatment. This research uniquely contributes by integrating behavioral economics techniques into addiction studies, applying experimental methods grounded in economic rationality by employing classical techniques, to measure the severity of GARP (Generalized Axiom of Revealed Preferenc) violations via metrics such as the Critical Cost Efficiency Index (CCEI). These methods provide precise quantitative measures of rationality and decision-making consistency, delivering insights for policymakers and treatment practitioners.
External Link(s)

Registration Citation

Citation
Kader, Gavin et al. 2026. "Economic Rationality of People with Substance Use Disorder." AEA RCT Registry. July 23. https://doi.org/10.1257/rct.19182-1.0
Experimental Details

Interventions

Intervention(s)
Intervention Start Date
2026-07-20
Intervention End Date
2026-08-02

Primary Outcomes

Primary Outcomes (end points)
Quantity choices from 2-D graphs of budget sets (for varying prices, in different economic contexts)
Primary Outcomes (explanation)
Economics rationality indices: CCEI, MPI (min/max), HMI, MCI, VAR (average)

Secondary Outcomes

Secondary Outcomes (end points)
Secondary Outcomes (explanation)

Experimental Design

Experimental Design
Subjects will be presented with a sequence of independent 25 decision problems under risk, 25 social choice decision problems, and 25 intertemporal decision problems on paper. Each decision problem will be presented as a choice from a 2 dimensional budget line. A choice of the allocation from the budget line represents an allocation of points between accounts A (x-axis) and B (y-axis). For each of the decision problems, subjects will choose their allocation with a cross on the budget line, as well as write the amount they want to allocate to the account A to ensure accuracy. Each graph clearly will be labeled and have gridlines. The maximum allocations to the A/B accounts are also shown for clarity.

For risky choice, the payoffs of a particular choice are determined by the chosen allocation representing the tradeoff between the A and B accounts. Subjects receive the points allocated to one of the accounts, A or B, determined at random with equal chance (i.e. one arrow security for each account). For each of the A and B accounts, there is a natural price tradeoff between the two, which is determined by the slope i.e. the relative price.

For social choice, the payoffs are similarly determined by a combination of A and B accounts. In each round, subjects allocate money to themselves (A) and their randomly matched and anonymous partner (B). Similarly, the slope refers to the tradeoff between money allocated to themselves and money allocated to their partner. The allocation that is implemented is determined by equal chance.

For intertemporal choice, the payoffs are also determined by a combination of A and B accounts. In each round, subjects allocate money to today (A) and an amount of money one month later (B). Similarly, the slope refers to the tradeoff between money today and money one month later.
Experimental Design Details
Not available
Randomization Method
Computer
Randomization Unit
Individual
Was the treatment clustered?
No

Experiment Characteristics

Sample size: planned number of clusters
140 individuals
Sample size: planned number of observations
140 individuals
Sample size (or number of clusters) by treatment arms
100 individuals with substance abuse disorder in rehabilitation clinics, 40 individuals control (from a nearby community)
Minimum detectable effect size for main outcomes (accounting for sample design and clustering)
IRB

Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)

IRB Name
Chengdu Normal University
IRB Approval Date
2022-12-23
IRB Approval Number
2022120