Mente Amiga - School-based mental health (SBMH) support system for public schools in El Salvador

Last registered on August 10, 2026

Pre-Trial

Trial Information

General Information

Title
Mente Amiga - School-based mental health (SBMH) support system for public schools in El Salvador
RCT ID
AEARCTR-0019234
Initial registration date
August 06, 2026

Initial registration date is when the trial was registered.

It corresponds to when the registration was submitted to the Registry to be reviewed for publication.

First published
August 10, 2026, 4:40 PM EDT

First published corresponds to when the trial was first made public on the Registry after being reviewed.

Locations

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information

Primary Investigator

Affiliation
University of Bern

Other Primary Investigator(s)

PI Affiliation
University of Zurich
PI Affiliation
University of Konstanz

Additional Trial Information

Status
In development
Start date
2027-03-01
End date
2028-11-03
Secondary IDs
Prior work
This trial does not extend or rely on any prior RCTs.
Abstract
An estimated one in seven adolescents worldwide experiences an emotional or behavioural disorder (EBD), including anxiety disorders, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), and conduct disorder. Untreated EBD poses a substantial challenge for education systems, affecting not only the students themselves but also their classmates and teachers. This study evaluates the impact of Mente Amiga (“Kind Mind”), a school-based mental health programme that combines a universal social-emotional learning (SEL) curriculum for all students with targeted psychological support for students identified as at risk. Mente Amiga targets primary school students aged 9–11 years and is implemented in public schools across the departments of La Unión, Morazán, San Miguel, and Usulután in El Salvador. The programme is delivered in two implementation models: one led by trained school psychologists and one led by trained classroom teachers. The primary objective of the evaluation is to identify the most cost-effective and scalable approach to delivering school-based mental health support by comparing these two implementation models and assessing their effects on students’ emotional and behavioural regulation, academic outcomes, and the broader classroom environment.

External Link(s)

Registration Citation

Citation
Jakob, Martina, Miriam Prater and Fanny Valli-Puljic. 2026. "Mente Amiga - School-based mental health (SBMH) support system for public schools in El Salvador." AEA RCT Registry. August 10. https://doi.org/10.1257/rct.19234-1.0
Sponsors & Partners

Partner

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information
Experimental Details

Interventions

Intervention(s)
The study experimentally compares two delivery models for school-based mental health (SBMH) support. Both models target primary school students (grades 3–5, ages 9–11), run for two consecutive school years (six months per year), and follow a three-tiered approach consisting of universal social-emotional learning (SEL) sessions for all students (Tier 1) and targeted group or individual psychological support for students with greater needs (Tiers 2 and 3). The two treatment arms differ only in the provider of these services: in one arm, trained school psychologists deliver the intervention, while in the other, trained classroom teachers deliver the intervention. Control schools receive no intervention. Treatment is randomized at the school level across 300 randomly selected public schools, with 100 schools assigned to each study arm.
Intervention Start Date
2027-04-01
Intervention End Date
2028-09-29

Primary Outcomes

Primary Outcomes (end points)
- Student behavior and mental health
- Student academic performance
- Student social dynamics
- Classroom climate
- Teacher mental health
Primary Outcomes (explanation)
- Student behavior and mental health: measured through the Strength and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) (Goodman 1997, 1999). The primary outcomes are three scores computed according to the instrument’s scoring guidelines, including the overall SDQ score (sum of all items), an internalizing score (sum over all items capturing anxiety and depression symptoms), and an externalizing score (sum over all items capturing hyperactivity symptoms and conduct disorder).
- Student academic performance: assessed through a 40-minutes paper-and-pencil test in math an language. A weighted score and Item Response Theory (IRT) score will be computed.
- Student social dynamics: measured through friendship nominations. Outcomes will include network measures derived from these nominations, such as number of friends, homophily index, clustering, in-degree centrality, eigenvector centrality, betweenness centrality.
- Classroom climate: assessed through the World Bank's Classroom Snapshot Observation System. The primary outcome is the average number of students engaged in off-task behaviors (e.g., social interaction, inattentiveness, lack of participation).
- Teacher mental health: measured through a validated version of the Copenhagen Burnout Inventory adapted for teachers (Fiorilli et al., 2015). The primary outcome is the overall burnout score computed according to the instrument’s scoring guidelines.

Secondary Outcomes

Secondary Outcomes (end points)
Secondary Outcomes (explanation)

Experimental Design

Experimental Design
Schools will be randomly assigned to one of three experimental conditions:
- T1: psychologists-delivered SBMH support (100 schools),
- T2: teachers-delivered SBMH support (100 schools),
- Control: a control group (no support, 100 schools).
Experimental Design Details
Not available
Randomization Method
Randomization will be stratified by school size (2 bins), rural/urban area (2 bins), and previous year test scores on the national standardized test (3 bins). The randomization itself will be conducted using the software RStudio.
Randomization Unit
School
Was the treatment clustered?
Yes

Experiment Characteristics

Sample size: planned number of clusters
300 schools
Sample size: planned number of observations
13,500 students, 900 teachers (900 classes).
Sample size (or number of clusters) by treatment arms
100 schools per treatment arm
Minimum detectable effect size for main outcomes (accounting for sample design and clustering)
Based on our design with 100 clusters (schools) per treatment, 45 students per cluster, and assuming 80% power and a 5% significance level, we estimate a minimum detectable effect size of 0.10 standard deviations for student-level outcomes and 0.16 standard deviations for teacher- and classroom-level outcomes (formula based on Bloom, 2008).
Supporting Documents and Materials

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information
IRB

Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)

IRB Name
Institutional Review Board (Ethics Committee) of the University of Konstanz
IRB Approval Date
2026-07-27
IRB Approval Number
IRB statement 24/2026