Reducing Coordination Failures in Antenatal Care: Evidence from Mozambique

Last registered on July 27, 2026

Pre-Trial

Trial Information

General Information

Title
Reducing Coordination Failures in Antenatal Care: Evidence from Mozambique
RCT ID
AEARCTR-0019246
Initial registration date
July 26, 2026

Initial registration date is when the trial was registered.

It corresponds to when the registration was submitted to the Registry to be reviewed for publication.

First published
July 27, 2026, 7:19 AM EDT

First published corresponds to when the trial was first made public on the Registry after being reviewed.

Locations

Region

Primary Investigator

Affiliation
LSE

Other Primary Investigator(s)

PI Affiliation
Harvard School of Public Health
PI Affiliation
PI Affiliation
Instituto Nacional De Saude, Mozambique
PI Affiliation
Instituto Nacional de Saude, Mozambique
PI Affiliation
Instituto Nacional De Saude, Mozambique

Additional Trial Information

Status
Completed
Start date
2018-09-01
End date
2025-09-01
Secondary IDs
Prior work
This trial does not extend or rely on any prior RCTs.
Abstract
This study seeks to provide experimental evidence on the impact of a low-cost managerial intervention in the form of an appointment
scheduling system to manage patient flows. The goal is to measure the impact of the scheduling system on patient retention in care, the quality of service provision and patient and provider satisfaction. A scheduling system was designed to address a common coordination failure in first-come, first-served public health care: patients concentrate arrivals in the early morning and on Mondays and Fridays, generating significant congestion in clinics. We will work with 80 clinics in Southern Mozambique to test the impact of a scheduling system that smooths patients across times of the day and days of the week.

Registration Citation

Citation
Albuquerque, Amanda et al. 2026. "Reducing Coordination Failures in Antenatal Care: Evidence from Mozambique." AEA RCT Registry. July 27. https://doi.org/10.1257/rct.19246-1.0
Sponsors & Partners

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information
Experimental Details

Interventions

Intervention(s)
We design an appointment scheduling system to address the coordination failure by
redistributing demand across hours and days. The goal is to stagger arrivals to reduce peak congestion, shrink
idle capacity, and smooth provider workloads. In partnership with the National Institute of Health, the National Directorate of Public Health,
and Provincial Health Authorities, we designed and implemented a low-cost appointment scheduling
system to improve the management of patient flows. Under the new system, providers maintained
an appointment book in each consultation room, dividing the day into one-hour blocks with a
maximum of six patients per block. At the end of each visit, the provider consulted the appointment
book, offered the patient a choice of available slots on their return date, and recorded the
appointment both in the book and on the patient’s own booklet. Patients were informed that they
would be seen within one hour of their scheduled time. To accommodate existing clinical practice,
first-time ANC patients could attend consultations during a reserved two-hour block each morning
(generally from 7 to 9 or 8 until 10 am).
Intervention (Hidden)
Intervention Start Date
2018-09-01
Intervention End Date
2024-09-01

Primary Outcomes

Primary Outcomes (end points)
Patient Retention in Care (number of antenatal consultations attended), quality of care (number of clinical procedures undertaken during consultation out of the health clinic's checklist), patient satisfaction (satisfaction with waiting time, satisfaction with the quality of care and satisfaction with providers), provider satisfaction (job satisfaction, burnout, stress levels)
Primary Outcomes (explanation)

Secondary Outcomes

Secondary Outcomes (end points)
Secondary Outcomes (explanation)

Experimental Design

Experimental Design
We sampled 80 high patient volume public health clinics across four
southern provinces in Mozambique: Maputo City, Maputo Province, Gaza, and Inhambane. Clinics
were stratified by province and randomly assigned to implement the scheduling system (40
treatment clinics) or to continue the existing first-come, first-served system (40 control clinics).
To prevent contamination through patient self-selection into better-managed clinics, we imposed
a two-kilometer buffer zone between participating facilities. Switching across clinics was further
constrained by the fact that patient files were in physical records held at a single clinic and could
not be accessed elsewhere, making transfers extremely rare. Treatment and control clinics were balanced
on baseline characteristics including patient volume, degree of urbanization, infrastructure
quality, staffing levels, and organizational capacity.
Experimental Design Details
Randomization Method
Randomization done in computer
Randomization Unit
Health clinic
Was the treatment clustered?
No

Experiment Characteristics

Sample size: planned number of clusters
80
Sample size: planned number of observations
14000 patients surveyed through the audit survey to measure waiting time, 2000 patients surveyed in the exit surveys, 4000 observations from the registry book.
Sample size (or number of clusters) by treatment arms
40 health clinics
Minimum detectable effect size for main outcomes (accounting for sample design and clustering)
0.05 standard deviations, number of visits, 80% power
Supporting Documents and Materials

Documents

Document Name
Explanation of AEA Registry Timing
Document Type
other
Document Description
This document explains the late registration of this trial
File
Explanation of AEA Registry Timing

MD5: f251f816fa1b86c5f93dff1b4f61f64c

SHA1: ad64281132174a4cc1aee61cb6e64fc88fbec7c9

Uploaded At: July 26, 2026

IRB

Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)

IRB Name
LSE Ethical Committee
IRB Approval Date
2016-02-15
IRB Approval Number
Ref # 000436]
IRB Name
Comite Nacional de Etica
IRB Approval Date
2021-11-02
IRB Approval Number
671/CNBS/2021
IRB Name
Institutional Review Board (IRB) of the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health
IRB Approval Date
2019-04-26
IRB Approval Number
IRB19-0462

Post-Trial

Post Trial Information

Study Withdrawal

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information

Intervention

Is the intervention completed?
No
Data Collection Complete
Yes
Data Collection Completion Date
Final Sample Size: Number of Clusters (Unit of Randomization)
Was attrition correlated with treatment status?
Final Sample Size: Total Number of Observations
Final Sample Size (or Number of Clusters) by Treatment Arms
Data Publication

Data Publication

Is public data available?
No

Program Files

Program Files
Reports, Papers & Other Materials

Relevant Paper(s)

Reports & Other Materials