Social Media Viewership Experiment

Last registered on September 09, 2026

Pre-Trial

Trial Information

General Information

Title
Social Media Viewership Experiment
RCT ID
AEARCTR-0019565
Initial registration date
September 01, 2026

Initial registration date is when the trial was registered.

It corresponds to when the registration was submitted to the Registry to be reviewed for publication.

First published
September 09, 2026, 3:02 PM EDT

First published corresponds to when the trial was first made public on the Registry after being reviewed.

Locations

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information

Primary Investigator

Affiliation
MIT

Other Primary Investigator(s)

PI Affiliation
Northwestern Kellogg

Additional Trial Information

Status
In development
Start date
2026-09-01
End date
2026-09-22
Secondary IDs
Prior work
This trial does not extend or rely on any prior RCTs.
Abstract
In this experiment, participants scroll through randomized feeds of TikTok videos for 20 minutes, and we measure their engagement with videos of different types.
External Link(s)

Registration Citation

Citation
Noy, Shakked and Aakaash Rao. 2026. "Social Media Viewership Experiment." AEA RCT Registry. September 09. https://doi.org/10.1257/rct.19565-1.0
Experimental Details

Interventions

Intervention(s)
The intervention consists of randomized assignment of a feed of TikTok videos drawn from a large experimental pool. The aggregate composition of the feed is randomized as described in the attached details pdf, the specific videos of each type are randomly drawn from a larger pool, and the order of the videos is random.
Intervention Start Date
2026-09-01
Intervention End Date
2026-09-22

Primary Outcomes

Primary Outcomes (end points)
The primary outcomes are various measures of participants' engagement with each video, as described in the attached details pdf.
Primary Outcomes (explanation)

Secondary Outcomes

Secondary Outcomes (end points)
Secondary Outcomes (explanation)

Experimental Design

Experimental Design
### Video sampling procedure
The videos sampled from this experiment come from four sources:
(A) Videos randomly sampled from the universe of videos posted on TikTok in the US, using TikTok's Research API.
(B) Videos scraped from the recent posts of news organizations, drawing from the list of the top 100 news organizations appearing in the sample of TikTok feeds we collected as part of a previous experiment.
(C) Videos created by participants in our previous "creator" experiment.
(D) Videos scraped from the recent posts of accounts appearing repeatedly in each of the TikTok feeds we collected as part of a previous experiment.

Below, we describe each of these sampling procedures. We then describe how these sources are combined to create participants' experimental feeds.

### A
These are videos scraped from TikTok's Research API across four repeated uses of our daily API quota. We randomly sample from the pool of videos posted 48-96 hours ago in the US. (Videos typically take 48 hours after being posted to appear in the API, so we aren't able to scrape more recently). Half of our API requests sample from the pool of videos with at least 10 views, and half sample from the pool of videos with at least 10k views.

We then scrape the metadata and content of these posts. We exclude posts flagged as ads, posts for which scraping or classification fails due to inaccessible metadata, and posts that our classification flags as being in a language other than English. We also exclude posts whose classification does not fall into one of our four primary content quadrants (lifestyle, produced entertainment, cheap talk, and politics.)

### B
These are videos scraped from the top 100 English-language news organizations appearing in the TikTok feeds we previously collected as part of an experiment. For each organization we scrape their six most recent posts in the previous 7 days. We then scrape and classify them, including according to whether they are a piece of explicitly political news or not.

### C
These are videos we paid participants in our creator experiment $10 to post on their accounts. Each participant was randomly assigned one of our four content quadrants and offered $10 to create a post of this type on their account; these are the posts from people who accepted the offer and sent us the link to the video. As above, we exclude non-English posts and posts not falling into one of our four quadrants.

### D
These are videos scraped from accounts appearing frequently in the feeds of the participants in a previous experiment who provided us with their TikTok viewership histories. For each of these participants, we randomly sample twenty creators who appeared in their feed at least 3 times, replacing creators whose recent profile we fail to scrape. For each of these creators, we scrape their most recent post. These videos are primarily for insertion into the feeds of these previous participants when they now participate in our viewership experiment.

### Constructing participants' feeds
Videos from the aforementioned four sources compose the pool we draw on for the experiment. We then sample posts into participants' feeds stratified in the following way (participants do not have fixed-length feeds, they scroll until 20 minutes have elapsed):
1. For each participant, we independently draw a lifestyle fraction and politics fraction from {0, 0.1, 0.2, 0.3}, with probabilities {0.2, 0.2, 0.4, 0.2}. "Lifestyle" and "politics" means videos from our lifestyle or politics classification quadrants, respectively. Of the remaining videos, 5ppt are non-political news videos posted by news organizations, 1ppt are drawn from the full pool of Source D videos, and the rest are equally split between our cheap-talk and produced-entertainment quadrants. Those are the probabilities for participants who are not part of our previous TikTok-history collection. For participants who are, instead of the 1% drawn from the full pool of Source D videos, they get the 20 videos scraped from creators who previously appeared in their personal feed randomly interleaved into the first 100 posts they see.
2. Within the politics category, 70% of videos are drawn from Source A, 20% from Source B, and 10% from Source C. Nonpolitical news videos are drawn from Source B. Within the other categories, 90% are drawn from Source A and 10% from Source C.
Experimental Design Details
Not available
Randomization Method
Computer-based randomization
Randomization Unit
Person-by-video level
Was the treatment clustered?
No

Experiment Characteristics

Sample size: planned number of clusters
500 people, each scrolling for 20 minutes
Sample size: planned number of observations
500 people
Sample size (or number of clusters) by treatment arms
For the component of randomization that varies the aggregate composition of the feed, see the attached details document for the cross-randomization probabilities. The rest of the randomization (drawing of specific videos and randomization of order) happens separately for each person.
Minimum detectable effect size for main outcomes (accounting for sample design and clustering)
Supporting Documents and Materials

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information
IRB

Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)

IRB Name
MIT Committee on the Use of Humans as Experimental Subjects
IRB Approval Date
2025-08-19
IRB Approval Number
2506001673
Analysis Plan

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information