Targeting and Peer Effects in Training Programmes for Poor Females
Last registered on January 07, 2014

Pre-Trial

Trial Information
General Information
Title
Targeting and Peer Effects in Training Programmes for Poor Females
RCT ID
AEARCTR-0000196
Initial registration date
Not yet registered
Last updated
January 07, 2014 10:47 AM EST
Location(s)
Region
Primary Investigator
Affiliation
Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile
Other Primary Investigator(s)
PI Affiliation
Universidad Alberto Hurtado
PI Affiliation
Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile
Additional Trial Information
Status
Completed
Start date
2011-01-01
End date
2014-01-01
Secondary IDs
Abstract
This study aims to evaluate a new methodology of focalization of training as well as to analyze peer effects among low-income women in Chile. The main objective is to increase female participation in the Chilean labour market, reducing the existent gender gap. Results suggest benefits at an individual level, rather than effects for the labour market as a whole. In general, tracking groups ("high" and "low" groups) have a better performance than the non-tracking group, particularly for participants that belong to the "low" group. Also, it seems as though belonging to the "high" group has no effects on the satisfaction level of participants. No impact is identified on wages or family income; hours, days or Sundays worked; number of jobs; nor improvements in the labour market. There are no indicators related to employability, job quality or job formality.
External Link(s)
Registration Citation
Citation
Lafortune, Jeanne, Marcela Perticara and Jose Tessada. 2014. "Targeting and Peer Effects in Training Programmes for Poor Females." AEA RCT Registry. January 07. https://doi.org/10.1257/rct.196-1.0.
Sponsors & Partners

There are documents in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access to this information.

Request Information
Experimental Details
Interventions
Intervention(s)
Intervention Start Date
2012-01-01
Intervention End Date
2013-01-01
Primary Outcomes
Primary Outcomes (end points)
Personal & family benefits, likelihood work with peers, situation a year or 2 ago; working conditions, family income, chance of finding employment, perception of participants.
Primary Outcomes (explanation)
Scores related to personal benefits, family benefits, likelihood to work with peers, effect on happiness, comparison to the personal and work situation a year or two ago; number of hours, days or Sundays worked; monthly wage and family income; type of job contract; chance of finding employment, all of such according to the different types and levels of participants. Also, some of the results relate to the perception of participants, about the courses undertaken and about their colleagues participating in such courses.
Secondary Outcomes
Secondary Outcomes (end points)
Secondary Outcomes (explanation)
Experimental Design
Experimental Design
Firstly, participants were selected randomly for the treatment and control group. The treatment participants were then assigned randomly in a "mixed"/"heterogeneous" class and in a "selection"/"homogeneous" class. From the latter class, some were allocated in a "high" group and others in a "low" group, according to the propensity to work index (obtained from the CASEN survey). If participants had a propensity to work index above its median, they were allocated in the "high" group and if it were below, they belonged to the "low" group.
Experimental Design Details
Randomization Method
Individual randomization
Randomization Unit
individual
Was the treatment clustered?
No
Experiment Characteristics
Sample size: planned number of clusters
9083
Sample size: planned number of observations
9,083 women in baseline, 3,538 in endline.
Sample size (or number of clusters) by treatment arms
Baseline: Control group: 3,355. Treatment group: 5,728 (approximately 63% were assigned randomly to the treatment group).
Endline: Control group: 1,249. Treatment group: 2.289 (approximately 65% were assigned randomly to the treatment group).
Minimum detectable effect size for main outcomes (accounting for sample design and clustering)
IRB
INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARDS (IRBs)
IRB Name
Innovations for Poverty Action IRB
IRB Approval Date
2012-12-06
IRB Approval Number
12Nov-006
Post-Trial
Post Trial Information
Study Withdrawal
Intervention
Is the intervention completed?
No
Is data collection complete?
Data Publication
Data Publication
Is public data available?
No
Program Files
Program Files
Reports and Papers
Preliminary Reports
Relevant Papers