Differential Treatment of Families with Children: A Correspondence Study of the Moscow Real Estate Market (Phase 2)

Last registered on September 28, 2026

Pre-Trial

Trial Information

General Information

Title
Differential Treatment of Families with Children: A Correspondence Study of the Moscow Real Estate Market (Phase 2)
RCT ID
AEARCTR-0019786
Initial registration date
September 21, 2026

Initial registration date is when the trial was registered.

It corresponds to when the registration was submitted to the Registry to be reviewed for publication.

First published
September 28, 2026, 8:49 AM EDT

First published corresponds to when the trial was first made public on the Registry after being reviewed.

Locations

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information

Primary Investigator

Affiliation
HSE University

Other Primary Investigator(s)

Additional Trial Information

Status
In development
Start date
2026-09-01
End date
2027-03-31
Secondary IDs
Prior work
This trial does not extend or rely on any prior RCTs.
Abstract
This study examines whether financial incentives change the behavior of landlords who exclude families with children from rental housing. We conduct a correspondence study on the largest online real estate platform in Russia, targeting listings in Moscow that state children are not accepted.

We send messages expressing interest in the property and stating that the applicant household includes a two-year-old child. Acknowledging the listing's restriction, the applicant asks the landlord to make an exception. Landlords are randomly assigned to receive one of several versions of this message, which differ only in the financial incentive offered. The applicant is otherwise described identically in all versions.

Our primary outcome is whether the landlord responds within seven days. We also record how quickly the landlord responds and whether the response is positive.

This is Phase 2 of a two-phase study. Phase 1 (AEARCTR-0017892) studied landlords who state that they welcome children.
External Link(s)

Registration Citation

Citation
SLONIMCZYK, FABIAN. 2026. "Differential Treatment of Families with Children: A Correspondence Study of the Moscow Real Estate Market (Phase 2)." AEA RCT Registry. September 28. https://doi.org/10.1257/rct.19786-1.0
Experimental Details

Interventions

Intervention(s)
We send a message to landlords whose listings state that children are not accepted. The message expresses interest in the property and states that the applicant has a two-year-old child. Acknowledging the restriction, the applicant asks the landlord to make an exception.

Listings are randomly assigned to one of four versions of this message. The first arm offers no financial incentive (control). The remaining three offer alternative financial incentives. The specific incentives are described in the pre-analysis plan and will be made public when data collection closes.
Intervention Start Date
2026-09-22
Intervention End Date
2027-02-28

Primary Outcomes

Primary Outcomes (end points)
1. Response rate
2. Positive response (robustness)
Primary Outcomes (explanation)
The response rate is binary: 1 if we receive any response within 7 days, 0 otherwise. Positive response is a robustness recoding of the primary outcome. We set it to zero for any response that does not agree to a viewing or indicate that the apartment is available. Non-committal replies and any stated reason not to show the apartment—including that the property is unavailable or that children are not accepted—are coded as zero. Non-responders remain zero.

Secondary Outcomes

Secondary Outcomes (end points)
Time to response (latency)
Secondary Outcomes (explanation)
Time to response (in minutes) is the timestamp difference (registered in the platform) between the time the message is sent to the landlord and the landlord's response time.

Experimental Design

Experimental Design
We conduct a correspondence study on an online real estate platform. The target population is listings that explicitly state that children are not accepted.

We randomly assign listings to one of four arms: a control arm in which the applicant asks for an exception with no financial incentive, and three treatment arms in which the applicant offers a different financial incentive alongside the exception request. The specific incentive amounts are specified in the pre-analysis plan and will be made public when data collection closes.

Randomization is at the listing level. Listings are stratified by asking price and divided into blocks of four, with one listing per arm per block. Because new listings appear continuously on the platform, sampling proceeds in rounds; a round whose length is not a multiple of four may leave leftover listings, which are assigned to arms uniformly at random without replacement and pooled with the blocked listings for analysis.
All messages follow a common template and differ only in the incentive clause. The applicant is a married woman with a generic Russian name, seeking housing for herself, her husband, and their two-year-old son. All applicants are described as Russian citizens, and all landlords are contacted through the platform's messaging system.

The target sample is 2,750 contacted listings. Data collection is expected to take between 16 and 18 weeks.
Experimental Design Details
Not available
Randomization Method
Randomization will be done by a computer after block-stratifying by asking price
Randomization Unit
The randomization unit is the individual listing
Was the treatment clustered?
No

Experiment Characteristics

Sample size: planned number of clusters
We sample at most one listing per landlord: once a landlord has been contacted, any subsequent listings posted by that landlord are dropped from the sampling frame. Responses are therefore independent across listings in the sample.
Sample size: planned number of observations
2750 listings
Sample size (or number of clusters) by treatment arms
The treatment arms are equal weighted, hence around 688 per treatment
Minimum detectable effect size for main outcomes (accounting for sample design and clustering)
The MDE is a 5pp increase in the response rate at 80% power and 5% significance (two-sided), corresponding to approximately 6% of the baseline response rate. Larger effects are detectable with power approaching 100%.
IRB

Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)

IRB Name
Institutional Review Board of the Higher School of Economics
IRB Approval Date
2026-02-26
IRB Approval Number
N/A
Analysis Plan

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information