Experimental Evidence on Performance Management Training and Tools for Public Schools in Argentina

Last registered on October 10, 2017

Pre-Trial

Trial Information

General Information

Title
Experimental Evidence on Performance Management Training and Tools for Public Schools in Argentina
RCT ID
AEARCTR-0002453
Initial registration date
October 09, 2017

Initial registration date is when the trial was registered.

It corresponds to when the registration was submitted to the Registry to be reviewed for publication.

First published
October 10, 2017, 11:36 AM EDT

First published corresponds to when the trial was first made public on the Registry after being reviewed.

Locations

Region

Primary Investigator

Affiliation
New York University

Other Primary Investigator(s)

PI Affiliation
World Bank
PI Affiliation
World Bank

Additional Trial Information

Status
Completed
Start date
2014-10-27
End date
2017-04-24
Secondary IDs
Abstract
We present experimental evidence on the added value of performance management training and tools for school principals and supervisors, over and above information on student achievement. We randomly assigned 100 public primary schools in the province of Salta, Argentina to: (a) a control group, in which we administered standardized tests in math and Spanish at baseline and two follow-ups and made the results available to the schools through user-friendly reports; or (b) a treatment group, in which we did the same and also provided principals with training on how to develop a school improvement plan, a web-based dashboard to track progress on that plan, and two workshops to support their work.
External Link(s)

Registration Citation

Citation
Ganimian, Alejandro, Peter Holland and Rafael Hoyos. 2017. "Experimental Evidence on Performance Management Training and Tools for Public Schools in Argentina." AEA RCT Registry. October 10. https://doi.org/10.1257/rct.2453-1.0
Former Citation
Ganimian, Alejandro, Peter Holland and Rafael Hoyos. 2017. "Experimental Evidence on Performance Management Training and Tools for Public Schools in Argentina." AEA RCT Registry. October 10. https://www.socialscienceregistry.org/trials/2453/history/22183
Experimental Details

Interventions

Intervention(s)
We administered: (a) student assessments of math and Spanish; and (b) surveys of students; (c) teachers; and (d) principals. We sampled students and teachers to obtain cross-sectional information in grade 3 every year, as well as longitudinal information on the students who started grade 3 in 2014. Treatment and control schools received user-friendly province and school-level results reports. Additionally, treatment schools received training on how to develop a school improvement plan, access to a web-based dashboard to track progress on that plan, and two workshops to support their work.
Intervention Start Date
2014-10-27
Intervention End Date
2017-04-24

Primary Outcomes

Primary Outcomes (end points)
We measure the impact of the interventions over learning outcomes, captured by standardized tests in math and Spanish
Primary Outcomes (explanation)

Secondary Outcomes

Secondary Outcomes (end points)
Secondary Outcomes (explanation)

Experimental Design

Experimental Design
We randomly assigned 100 schools in the province of Salta, Argentina, to two experimental groups: (a) a control group, in which we administered standardized tests in math and Spanish at baseline and two follow-ups and made the results available to the schools through user-friendly reports; or (b) a treatment group, in which we did the same and also provided school principals and supervisors with training on how to develop a school improvement plan, a web-based dashboard to track progress on that plan, and two workshops to support their work.
Experimental Design Details
Randomization Method
The randomization was be done by running a Stata code on a computer in office.
Randomization Unit
We randomly assigned the 100 sampled schools to one of two experimental groups, stratifying our randomization by geographic area: 60 urban and 40 semi-urban schools.
Was the treatment clustered?
Yes

Experiment Characteristics

Sample size: planned number of clusters
100 schools
Sample size: planned number of observations
Baseline (2014): 5,508 students, 262 teachers, 92 principals. First follow-up (2015): 10,537 students, 507 teachers, 93 principals. Second follow-up (2016): 9,216 students, 454 teachers, 94 principals.
Sample size (or number of clusters) by treatment arms
50 treatment schools, 50 control schools.
Minimum detectable effect size for main outcomes (accounting for sample design and clustering)
IRB

Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)

IRB Name
IRB Approval Date
IRB Approval Number

Post-Trial

Post Trial Information

Study Withdrawal

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information

Intervention

Is the intervention completed?
Yes
Intervention Completion Date
April 24, 2017, 12:00 +00:00
Data Collection Complete
Yes
Data Collection Completion Date
November 04, 2016, 12:00 +00:00
Final Sample Size: Number of Clusters (Unit of Randomization)
94 schools
Was attrition correlated with treatment status?
No
Final Sample Size: Total Number of Observations
Baseline (2014): 5.508 students, 262 teachers, 92 principals. First follow-up (2015): 10.537 students, 507 teachers, 93 principals. Second follow-up (2016): 9.216 students, 454 teachers, 94 principals.
Final Sample Size (or Number of Clusters) by Treatment Arms
Data Publication

Data Publication

Is public data available?
No

Program Files

Program Files
No
Reports, Papers & Other Materials

Relevant Paper(s)

Reports & Other Materials