| Field | Before | After |
|---|---|---|
| Field Trial Status | Before in_development | After completed |
| Field Abstract | Before The goal of this research is to examine the performance of public, private (NGO) and hybrid (public-private) governance (Mahoney, McGahan, & Pitelis, 2009; McGahan, Zelner, & Barney, 2013; Quélin, Kivleniece, & Lazzarini, 2017) in a resource-scarce environment (Baker & Nelson, 2005; George, McGahan, & Prabhu, 2012). Therefore, this research aims to develop an understanding of how different governance structures deploy resources to promote the public interest by evaluating a job training program targeting residents of Brazilian favelas. The research objective is to analyze alternative forms of commissioning resources under public versus private versus hybrid governance mode. Specifically, we analyze how governance structure influences both the fulfillment of the public interest and the distribution of value among stakeholders engaged in the deployment. Our setting allows a comparison of how much a non-profit organization can foster social prosperity – measured by the increased level of employment (formal and informal), income, the confidence level of individuals, the optimism level of individuals, among other outcomes. The approach is to compare these outcomes between individuals who undertook the training and those who did not. Also, the research design enables us to understand whether the training is more effective when performed through the public organization, the NGO, or through a hybrid form. References Baker, T., & Nelson, R. E. (2005). Creating Something from Nothing: Resource Construction through Entrepreneurial Bricolage. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(3), 329–366. George, G., McGahan, A. M., & Prabhu, J. (2012). Innovation for Inclusive Growth: Towards a Theoretical Framework and a Research Agenda. Journal of Management Studies, 49(4), 661–683. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2012.01048.x Mahoney, J. T., McGahan, A. M., & Pitelis, C. N. (2009). The interdependence of private and public interests. Organization Science, 20(6), 1034–1052. http://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1090.0472 McGahan, A. M., Zelner, B. A., & Barney, J. B. (2013). Entrepreneurship in the Public Interest: Introduction to the Special Issue. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 7(1), 1–5. Quélin, B. V., Kivleniece, I., & Lazzarini, S. (2017). Public-Private Collaboration, Hybridity and Social Value: Towards New Theoretical Perspectives. Journal of Management Studies, 54(6), 763–792. http://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12274 | After The goal of this research is to examine the performance of public, private (NGO) and hybrid (public-private) governance (Mahoney, McGahan, & Pitelis, 2009; McGahan, Zelner, & Barney, 2013; Quélin, Kivleniece, & Lazzarini, 2017) in a resource-scarce environment (Baker & Nelson, 2005; George, McGahan, & Prabhu, 2012). Therefore, this research aims to develop an understanding of how different governance structures deploy resources to promote the public interest by evaluating a job training program targeting residents of Brazilian favelas. The research objective is to analyze alternative forms of commissioning resources under public versus private versus hybrid governance mode. Specifically, we analyze how governance structure influences both the fulfillment of the public interest and the distribution of value among stakeholders engaged in the deployment. Our setting allows a comparison of how much a non-profit organization can foster social prosperity – measured by the increased level of employment (formal and informal), income, the confidence level of individuals, the optimism level of individuals, among other outcomes. The approach is to compare these outcomes between individuals who undertook the training and those who did not. Also, the research design enables us to understand whether the training is more effective when performed through the public organization, the NGO, or through a hybrid form. References Baker, T., & Nelson, R. E. (2005). Creating Something from Nothing: Resource Construction through Entrepreneurial Bricolage. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(3), 329–366. George, G., McGahan, A. M., & Prabhu, J. (2012). Innovation for Inclusive Growth: Towards a Theoretical Framework and a Research Agenda. Journal of Management Studies, 49(4), 661–683. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2012.01048.x Mahoney, J. T., McGahan, A. M., & Pitelis, C. N. (2009). The interdependence of private and public interests. Organization Science, 20(6), 1034–1052. http://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1090.0472 McGahan, A. M., Zelner, B. A., & Barney, J. B. (2013). Entrepreneurship in the Public Interest: Introduction to the Special Issue. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 7(1), 1–5. Quélin, B. V., Kivleniece, I., & Lazzarini, S. (2017). Public-Private Collaboration, Hybridity and Social Value: Towards New Theoretical Perspectives. Journal of Management Studies, 54(6), 763–792. http://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12274 |
| Field Trial End Date | Before July 31, 2024 | After January 25, 2024 |
| Field Last Published | Before July 25, 2023 09:21 AM | After January 25, 2024 03:55 PM |
| Field Intervention (Public) | Before | After The intervention provided a three-phase educational program to populations living in two favelas in Rio de Janeiro, Cidade de Deus and Pavuna. The goal of the program is to support individuals' educational development and entry into the workforce, either as formal employees or entrepreneurs. The program takes about 9 months in total, with the first phase focused on socio-emotional abilities, the second phase on technical training, and the third phase on managerial and entrepreneurship skills. |
| Field Public analysis plan | Before No | After Yes |
| Field Pi as first author | Before No | After Yes |
| Field | Before | After |
|---|---|---|
| Field Document Name | Before | After Legal Responsibility: Description of the Randomization to the Rio de Janeiro Municipal Government |
| Field Custom Type | Before | After Legal Responsibility: Description of the Randomization |
| Field File | Before |
After
Fundamentação da proposta de pesquisa_tradução.docx.pdf
MD5:
65aa5b1698882514d6a7b4fa3f1dad17
SHA1:
90bb1173cc61bec01775f7ec9f6044c7825fbeac
|
| Field Description | Before | After The Rio de Janeiro Municipality through the Subsecratry of Social Assistance and Human Rights allowed the execution of this project in two CRAS (Reference Center for Social Assistance) in Cidade de Deus and Pavuna. The public servants were concerned about the mechanism behind the randomization. So, to assure the legality of the procedure, Banco da Providencia and the PI wrote a document describing the process to a nontechnical audience, and describing that they were responsible for the process, which had been previously approved by the University of Toronto IRB. |
| Field Public | Before | After Yes |
| Field | Before | After |
|---|---|---|
| Field Document Name | Before | After Authorization from Banco da Providencia |
| Field Custom Type | Before | After Authorization from Banco da Providencia |
| Field File | Before |
After
2018_02_02_BdP letter of consent name and date.pdf
MD5:
9b132a3285deecc7bd568e583f86549a
SHA1:
cefa5b458481f77c3f286cbc2884790ddd2bab44
|
| Field Description | Before | After Letter of Consent from Banco da Providência authorizing the research. |
| Field Public | Before | After Yes |
| Field | Before | After |
|---|---|---|
| Field Document Name | Before | After Authorization from Rio de Janeiro Municipality Secretary of Social Assistance and Human Rights |
| Field Custom Type | Before | After Authorization from Rio de Janeiro Municipality Secretary of Social Assistance and Human Rights |
| Field File | Before |
After
2018_12_05_Termo de Autorização.pdf
MD5:
3bc5f867601320d9654d8123660baa22
SHA1:
03e284dfae7826a079ff5d7ef3ebd0a4f2e2e9ab
|
| Field Description | Before | After Letter of Consent from Rio de Janeiro Municipality Secretary of Social Assistance and Human Rights authorizing the research. |
| Field Public | Before | After Yes |
| Field | Before | After |
|---|---|---|
| Field Document Name | Before | After University of Toronto Research Ethics Board Approval |
| Field Custom Type | Before | After University of Toronto Research Ethics Board Approval |
| Field File | Before |
After
2021_12_21_REB Renew.pdf
MD5:
11118a7d5cd5eaa989ec7fa3ca933e29
SHA1:
6a6187935ff22d3ae9f574b3ead98505435c9cc4
|
| Field Description | Before | After University of Toronto Research Ethics Board Approval and project description. |
| Field Public | Before | After Yes |
| Field | Before | After |
|---|---|---|
| Field Partner Name | Before | After Banco da Providência |
| Field Partner Type | Before | After ngo |
| Field Partner Website (URL) | Before | After https://www.bancodaprovidencia.org.br/en |
| Field Public | Before | After Yes |
| Field | Before | After |
|---|---|---|
| Field Partner Name | Before | After Rio de Janeiro Municipality: Secretary of Social Assistance and Human Rights |
| Field Partner Type | Before | After government |
| Field Partner Website (URL) | Before | After https://www.secsocial.rj.gov.br/ |
| Field Public | Before | After Yes |
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Field Affiliation | Value University of Toronto |