Field
Trial Start Date
|
Before
February 13, 2019
|
After
April 29, 2019
|
Field
Trial End Date
|
Before
March 23, 2019
|
After
June 01, 2019
|
Field
Last Published
|
Before
October 29, 2018 05:47 PM
|
After
April 26, 2019 07:01 PM
|
Field
Intervention Start Date
|
Before
February 14, 2019
|
After
May 26, 2019
|
Field
Intervention End Date
|
Before
March 22, 2019
|
After
June 01, 2019
|
Field
Primary Outcomes (End Points)
|
Before
Creativity as measured through Guilford's Alternative Uses Task
Useful Creativity as measured by expert judges
|
After
Creativity as measured through Guilford's Alternative Uses Task: (1) novelty of ideas as rated by judges, (2) usefulness of ideas as rated by judges, (3) creativity as a composite of novelty and usefulness, and (3) total number of generated ideas in each task.
Useful Creativity of generated ideas, as measured by expert judges when participants are given a creative task (helping a band sell albums)
|
Field
Primary Outcomes (Explanation)
|
Before
Results of the alternative uses test are based on four criteria:
Fluency – the number of alternative uses
Originality – how unusual the ideas are
Flexibility – the range of ideas
Elaboration – level of detail
Useful creativity is measured by getting an expert judge or group of judges in a field to evaluate participant ideas. Evaluation technique will be similar to Study 3 in Grant, Adam M. and James W. Berry (2011), using the two criteria of novelty and usefulness.
Grant, Adam M. and James W. Berry (2011), “The Necessity of Others is the Mother of Invention: Intrinsic and Prosocial Motivations, Perspective Taking, and Creativity,” Academy of Management Journal, 54 (1), 73–96.
|
After
Results of the alternative uses test are based on multiple criteria:
Fluency – the number of alternative uses generated
Novelty– how novel the ideas are, as rated by two judges
Usefulness– the usefulness of the generated ideas, as rated by two judges
Useful creativity is measured by getting an expert judge or group of judges in a field to evaluate participant ideas. Evaluation technique will be similar to Study 3 in Grant, Adam M. and James W. Berry (2011), using the two criteria of novelty and usefulness.
Grant, Adam M. and James W. Berry (2011), “The Necessity of Others is the Mother of Invention: Intrinsic and Prosocial Motivations, Perspective Taking, and Creativity,” Academy of Management Journal, 54 (1), 73–96.
|
Field
Randomization Method
|
Before
Randomization done in office by a computer
|
After
Randomization done using the Qualtrics Randomizer
|
Field
Planned Number of Clusters
|
Before
180 individuals
|
After
250 individuals
|
Field
Planned Number of Observations
|
Before
180 individual
|
After
250 individuals
|
Field
Sample size (or number of clusters) by treatment arms
|
Before
30 individuals within each treatment and control
|
After
About 41 individuals within each treatment and control
|
Field
Did you obtain IRB approval for this study?
|
Before
No
|
After
Yes
|