Mentoring as a pathway to change education, life skills and sexual reproductive health among rural indigenous girl in Guatemala

Last registered on August 02, 2018

Pre-Trial

Trial Information

General Information

Title
Mentoring as a pathway to change education, life skills and sexual reproductive health among rural indigenous girl in Guatemala
RCT ID
AEARCTR-0003171
Initial registration date
July 31, 2018

Initial registration date is when the trial was registered.

It corresponds to when the registration was submitted to the Registry to be reviewed for publication.

First published
August 02, 2018, 2:11 AM EDT

First published corresponds to when the trial was first made public on the Registry after being reviewed.

Locations

Primary Investigator

Affiliation
Population Council

Other Primary Investigator(s)

PI Affiliation
Population Council
PI Affiliation
Population Council

Additional Trial Information

Status
In development
Start date
2016-01-01
End date
2018-12-01
Secondary IDs
Abstract
Guatemala's Quality of Life Survey consistently demonstrates that indigenous girls have very steep declines in school enrollment at the onset of adolescence. Enrollment also declines among indigenous boys during this period, but not nearly as rapidly as girls. Previous research suggests that parental expectations and social norms play a role in this drop. This study features a cluster randomized control trial that measures the impact of a safe spaces, mentoring and life skills curriculum intervention designed to change behavior, knowledge and attitudes associated with early dropout and other negative life outcomes. For this, we track 1,200 girls aged 12 to 17 living in rural indigenous communities in the highlands of Guatemala for a period of 12 months. The study tests for impact on school enrollment as a primary outcome and early marriage and pregnancy, life skills, and sexual reproductive health knowledge and gender norms as secondary outcomes.

External Link(s)

Registration Citation

Citation
Aponte, Alejandra, Angel del Valle and Kelly Hallman. 2018. "Mentoring as a pathway to change education, life skills and sexual reproductive health among rural indigenous girl in Guatemala." AEA RCT Registry. August 02. https://doi.org/10.1257/rct.3171-1.0
Former Citation
Aponte, Alejandra, Angel del Valle and Kelly Hallman. 2018. "Mentoring as a pathway to change education, life skills and sexual reproductive health among rural indigenous girl in Guatemala." AEA RCT Registry. August 02. https://www.socialscienceregistry.org/trials/3171/history/32539
Sponsors & Partners

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information
Experimental Details

Interventions

Intervention(s)
Intervention Start Date
2016-05-01
Intervention End Date
2017-06-01

Primary Outcomes

Primary Outcomes (end points)
Scholl enrollment
Primary Outcomes (explanation)
TBD

Secondary Outcomes

Secondary Outcomes (end points)
Life Skills, Sexual History, Protective Factors, Exposure to Violence.
Secondary Outcomes (explanation)
TBD

Experimental Design

Experimental Design
The evaluation employs a cluster randomized control trial (CRCT) to measure change, caused by AO, in the aforementioned impact and outcome indicators. For this, we randomly selected 20 treatment and 20 control communities, from a universe of 40 communities eligible to participate in AO in the Guatemalan department of Sololá. To improve the precision of our impact estimates, we used a subset of community-level covariates to stratify this sample into ten blocks, prior to executing the random assignment protocol. We will use this design to generate intent-to-treat (ITT) estimates of program impact, generated by comparing the average outcomes of girls living in treatment communities with the average outcomes of girls living in control communities, 12 months after the rollout of AO. In addition, we will observe "Treatment-on-the-Treated" effect estimates which measure impact by focusing on girls who actually participated in the program. The exact measurement strategies and estimation specifications used to generate both estimates are specified the analysis plan attached to this registration.
Experimental Design Details
The evaluation employs a cluster randomized control trial (CRCT) to measure change, caused by AO, in the aforementioned impact and outcome indicators. For this, we randomly selected 20 treatment and 20 control communities, from a universe of 40 communities eligible to participate in AO in the Guatemalan department of Sololá. To improve the precision of our impact estimates, we used a subset of community-level covariates to stratify this sample into ten blocks, prior to executing the random assignment protocol. We will use this design to generate intent-to-treat (ITT) estimates of program impact, generated by comparing the average outcomes of girls living in treatment communities with the average outcomes of girls living in control communities, 12 months after the rollout of AO. In addition, we will observe "Treatment-on-the-Treated" effect estimates which measure impact by focusing on girls who actually participated in the program. The exact measurement strategies and estimation specifications used to generate both estimates are specified the analysis plan attached to this registration.

We will observe the aforementioned effects for the full sample of evaluation participants, while checking for heterogeneity in program impact over girls aged 12-14 and girls aged 15-17. We consider age to be a key driver of heterogeneity, as uneven access to public secondary schools in evaluation communities ensures girl’s educational opportunities decrease with age (see Section 3.4). Likewise, cultural pressures to marry and bear children have been shown to affect older girls, rising markedly after girls reach puberty.
Randomization Method
The sample used for AO’s evaluation was selected using a three step process that involved: defining a universe of communities eligible to participate in the program within the Sololá region, dividing this universe into six cluster-level strata, conducting strata-level lotteries that randomly assigned communities to treatment or control, and, finally, selecting a random sample of respondents, within each treatment and control community, to participate in the baseline. These processes are documented in detail elsewhere, nonetheless we summarize them below:

1. Identify eligible communities: The universe of communities eligible to participate in AO was selected using data from the 2011 ENCOVI. The Council selected the Sololá Region for the evaluation, as this area was included in its qualitative work on the links between social norms and girl’s educational attainment. It identified which Sololá communities were eligible to participate in the program by identifying all K’iche’-speaking municipalities which had not previously participated in the program. Once the later were identified, the Council refined its eligibility criteria to include only communities with 500-1500 inhabitants and approximately 30-40 girls, aged 8-19. These criteria were employed, as the Council’s experience suggests this size population is required for the successful implementation of AO. The total number of communities identified by this process is 40, all of which are included in the evaluation.

2. Create strata of eligible communities: Prior to assigning communities to treatment and control, the sample of eligible communities was divided into strata formed by region (highland, lowland) and school type variables (public secondary school, private secondary school, no secondary school) derived from geographic data and the Council’s community census. The final number of strata identified at this stage is 10, the number of communities per strata ranges from 2-7.

3. Randomly assign eligible communities to treatment and control: To assign communities to the evaluation’s treatment and control groups, we used a single-round, random assignment algorithm that placed half of the communities in each strata in the treatment group and half in the control group. To ensure parity in the final number of treatment and control communities, in the first strata with an odd number of communities, we assigned the odd observation to treatment, in the second strata, we assigned it to control and so on.

4. Select a random sample of respondents within treatment and control communities: The Council did not have direct control over the process used to select the community-level sample of approximately 30 girls, aged 12-17, that were invited to participate in the baseline and, possibly, future data collection rounds. Nonetheless, the Council did instruct UNIMER, the external firm responsible for the baseline, to complete this task by randomly selecting the number of girls required from each community from a list of girls located in its community-level census. This step was implemented using Stata 14 on a Population Council computer.
Randomization Unit
Cluster (Community)
Was the treatment clustered?
Yes

Experiment Characteristics

Sample size: planned number of clusters
We identified the sample size required for this evaluation by estimating the number of clusters and individual respondents required to detect at least .166 standard deviation change girls’ school enrollment rates. This minimal detectable effect size was selected, as it is equal to the “gap” between indigenous girls and boy enrollment rates, reported for the Sololá Region in Guatemala’s 2011 National Quality of Life Survey (ENCOVI). Setting power at .8, alpha at .05, and intra-cluster correlation at 0, while accounting for attrition and other potential threats to sample size between measurement rounds, we estimate that a total of 40 clusters.
Sample size: planned number of observations
The number of individual observations per cluster required by the aforementioned power calculation is 30 observations per cluster. The sample for AO’s evaluation was, thereby, set at a total of 40 communities and 30 individual observations or 1200 girls , aged 12-17, spread over 40 communities.
Sample size (or number of clusters) by treatment arms
20 treatment
20 control
Minimum detectable effect size for main outcomes (accounting for sample design and clustering)
This study is powered to measure a .166 SD change in school enrollment. This effect size corresponds to an 8% change in enrollment and is equivalent to the size of the gap in enrollment rates observed between indigenous adolescent males (76%) and females (68%) in the Solola department, reported by Guatemala's 2011 Quality of Life Survey.
IRB

Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)

IRB Name
Population Council Institutional Review Board
IRB Approval Date
2014-01-27
IRB Approval Number
615
Analysis Plan

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information

Post-Trial

Post Trial Information

Study Withdrawal

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information

Intervention

Is the intervention completed?
No
Data Collection Complete
Data Publication

Data Publication

Is public data available?
No

Program Files

Program Files
Reports, Papers & Other Materials

Relevant Paper(s)

Reports & Other Materials