x

We are happy to announce that all trial registrations will now be issued DOIs (digital object identifiers). For more information, see here.
Testing the Effectiveness of Mobile Phone Data Collection for Microenterprises in Africa
Last registered on June 28, 2016

Pre-Trial

Trial Information
General Information
Title
Testing the Effectiveness of Mobile Phone Data Collection for Microenterprises in Africa
RCT ID
AEARCTR-0000346
Initial registration date
April 07, 2014
Last updated
June 28, 2016 9:53 PM EDT
Location(s)
Region
Primary Investigator
Affiliation
Duke University
Other Primary Investigator(s)
PI Affiliation
University of Cambridge
PI Affiliation
University of Oxford
Additional Trial Information
Status
Completed
Start date
2013-12-04
End date
2014-09-12
Secondary IDs
Abstract
This project proposes a Randomised Controlled Trial to test the effectiveness of using mobile phones to collect data on microenterprises. The researchers intend to track microenterprises over a 16-week period, with random assignment to alternative survey methods. The trial will run in Soweto, a low-income neighbourhood in South Africa, where the team is working with a partner NGO to prepare a randomised evaluation of an entrepreneurship training program. This presents an ideal opportunity to explore innovative data collection methods for microenterprises in Sub-Saharan Africa.

The researchers will conduct a listing exercise in Soweto in order to build a representative sample of 900 enterprises, which will then be divided between three data collection methods, using stratified random assignment:
- conventional face-to-face interviews at four-weekly intervals
- conventional face-to-face interviews at weekly intervals; and
- mobile-phone based interviews at weekly intervals.
This will allow the team to investigate (i) the relative accuracy of face-to-face and mobile phone-based interviews, and (ii) the degree of volatility in microenterprise outcomes omitted from low-frequency (monthly) interviews. All firms in the sample will also receive face-to-face baseline and endline interviews, in order to improve the comparability of the data collected across the three sub-groups.

If the results from this study suggest that we can accurately collect high-frequency data on microenterprise profits and sales using mobile phones, researchers will have a powerful and cheap new method for measuring volatility and dynamics in microenterprise performance. This is directly relevant for a very wide range of policy questions concerning microenterprises. For example, it is often argued that one key advantage of microfinance is that it helps to smooth shocks. It remains unclear whether microfinance does this by implicitly insuring microenterprises against unanticipated shocks, or by helping microenterprises to deal more effectively with ‘lumpy’ costs (such as end-of-month rent payments). This is a critical distinction for understanding how microfinance products can be improved, but is very difficult to identify without high-frequency data. If mobile phones can be used to reliably measure microenterprise performance, researchers will be able to characterise this volatility much more precisely, and better understand how volatility shifts over time.
External Link(s)
Registration Citation
Citation
Garlick, Robert, Kate Orkin and Simon Quinn. 2016. "Testing the Effectiveness of Mobile Phone Data Collection for Microenterprises in Africa." AEA RCT Registry. June 28. https://doi.org/10.1257/rct.346-2.0.
Former Citation
Garlick, Robert, Kate Orkin and Simon Quinn. 2016. "Testing the Effectiveness of Mobile Phone Data Collection for Microenterprises in Africa." AEA RCT Registry. June 28. https://www.socialscienceregistry.org/trials/346/history/9162.
Sponsors & Partners

There are documents in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access to this information.

Request Information
Experimental Details
Interventions
Intervention(s)
See attached pre-analysis plan.
Intervention Start Date
2014-03-10
Intervention End Date
2014-07-04
Primary Outcomes
Primary Outcomes (end points)
See attached pre-analysis plan.
Primary Outcomes (explanation)
See attached pre-analysis plan.
Secondary Outcomes
Secondary Outcomes (end points)
Secondary Outcomes (explanation)
Experimental Design
Experimental Design
See attached pre-analysis plan.
Experimental Design Details
See attached pre-analysis plan.
Randomization Method
See attached pre-analysis plan.
Randomization Unit
See attached pre-analysis plan.
Was the treatment clustered?
No
Experiment Characteristics
Sample size: planned number of clusters
See attached pre-analysis plan.
Sample size: planned number of observations
See attached pre-analysis plan.
Sample size (or number of clusters) by treatment arms
See attached pre-analysis plan.
Minimum detectable effect size for main outcomes (accounting for sample design and clustering)
See attached pre-analysis plan.
IRB
INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARDS (IRBs)
IRB Name
University of Oxford Central University Research Ethics Committee
IRB Approval Date
2013-07-30
IRB Approval Number
ECONCIA1213/0020
Analysis Plan
Analysis Plan Documents
Original pre-analysis plan

MD5: cd02925f9f25cdcb605bc5b731c1c4df

SHA1: 87db45155418d91d17b48d89bf419657c569bee0

Uploaded At: April 07, 2014

List of final deviations from pre-analysis plan

MD5: f9fd1eb9d8705cd11dd138eec5022e4d

SHA1: b9ac228707122c06d95f0e96c16e3bd31b4ec72f

Uploaded At: June 28, 2016

Post-Trial
Post Trial Information
Study Withdrawal
Intervention
Is the intervention completed?
No
Is data collection complete?
Data Publication
Data Publication
Is public data available?
No
Program Files
Program Files
Reports and Papers
Preliminary Reports
Relevant Papers