Field | Before | After |
---|---|---|
Field Last Published | Before November 26, 2018 02:11 PM | After May 16, 2023 07:22 AM |
Field Public Data URL | Before | After https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2020.102609 |
Field Is there a restricted access data set available on request? | Before Yes | After No |
Field Program Files | Before No | After Yes |
Field Program Files URL | Before | After https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2020.102609 |
Field Is data available for public use? | Before No | After Yes |
Field Keyword(s) | Before Governance, Other | After Governance, Other |
Field Building on Existing Work | Before | After No |
Field | Before | After |
---|---|---|
Field Paper Abstract | Before | After Most development practitioners would list engaging communities in the provision of public services among best practices for improving access. However, whether community participation enhances provision and use of public services relative to a non-participatory approach is largely unknown because few studies compare impacts when the same public service intervention is implemented with and without community participation. This field experiment compares three approaches to providing safe water in rural Bangladesh. Delegating decisions to the community increases use of safe water by about 80% relative to a top-down provider making the same decisions but only when the approach to delegating decisions limits elite influence. |
Field Paper Citation | Before | After Madajewicz, M., Tompsett, A., & Habib, M. A. (2021). How does delegating decisions to communities affect the provision and use of a public service? Evidence from a field experiment in Bangladesh. Journal of Development Economics, 150, 102609. |
Field Paper URL | Before | After https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2020.102609 |