| Field | Before | After |
|---|---|---|
| Field Study Withdrawn | Before | After No |
| Field Intervention Completion Date | Before | After December 30, 2018 |
| Field Data Collection Complete | Before | After Yes |
| Field Final Sample Size: Number of Clusters (Unit of Randomization) | Before | After 144 |
| Field Was attrition correlated with treatment status? | Before | After No |
| Field Final Sample Size: Total Number of Observations | Before | After 144 |
| Field Final Sample Size (or Number of Clusters) by Treatment Arms | Before | After 144 |
| Field Is there a restricted access data set available on request? | Before | After No |
| Field Program Files | Before | After No |
| Field Data Collection Completion Date | Before | After December 30, 2018 |
| Field Is data available for public use? | Before | After No |
| Field | Before | After |
|---|---|---|
| Field Paper Abstract | Before | After An extensive literature documents that people are willing to sacrifice personal material gain to adhere to a moral motive. However, less is known about the psychological mechanisms that operate when two moral motives come into conflict. We hypothesize that individuals engage in “moral motive selection,” adhering to the moral motive that aligns with their self-interest. We test this hypothesis using a laboratory experiment that induces a conflict between two of the most-studied moral motives: fairness and truth-telling. Consistent with our hypothesis, our results show that individuals prefer to adhere to the moral motive that is more aligned with their self-interest. |
| Field Paper Citation | Before | After Barron, Kai and Stüber, Robert and Veldhuizen, Roel van, Moral Motive Selection in the Lying-Dictator Game (2022). CESifo Working Paper No. 9911, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4215030 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4215030 |
| Field Paper URL | Before | After https://ssrn.com/abstract=4215030 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4215030 |