Stockton Economic Empowerment Demonstration

Last registered on December 19, 2018

Pre-Trial

Trial Information

General Information

Title
Stockton Economic Empowerment Demonstration
RCT ID
AEARCTR-0003655
Initial registration date
December 10, 2018

Initial registration date is when the trial was registered.

It corresponds to when the registration was submitted to the Registry to be reviewed for publication.

First published
December 19, 2018, 12:34 PM EST

First published corresponds to when the trial was first made public on the Registry after being reviewed.

Locations

Primary Investigator

Affiliation
University of Tennessee

Other Primary Investigator(s)

PI Affiliation
University of Pennsylvania

Additional Trial Information

Status
In development
Start date
2018-12-10
End date
2021-02-15
Secondary IDs
Abstract
The Stockton Economic Empowerment Demonstration (SEED) is the country’s first city-led guaranteed income (GI) pilot. It is a collaboration between the Office of Mayor Michael Tubbs, the Economic Security Project (ESP), and the residents of Stockton. In 2019, SEED will begin providing at least 100 Stocktonians with a GI of 500 USD per month for 18 months. The income will be distributed monthly through prepaid debit cards that will be issued in each recipient’s name. Since the income is “guaranteed,” there are no work requirements or restrictions on how the money can be spent. The project relies on a randomized controlled trial with parallel mixed methods design (QUAN + QUAL) containing quantitative and qualitative research strands anchored by participatory action research (PAR), and informed by evidence-based learning agendas (Teddlie & Tashakkori, 2008; Urban Institute, 2018). The primary research questions are: (1) How does GI impact volatility? (2) To what degree do changes in income volatility alter financial well-being, psychological distress, and physical functioning? (3) How does GI generate agency over one’s future?
External Link(s)

Registration Citation

Citation
Baker, Amy Castro and Stacia Martin-West. 2018. "Stockton Economic Empowerment Demonstration." AEA RCT Registry. December 19. https://doi.org/10.1257/rct.3655-1.0
Former Citation
Baker, Amy Castro and Stacia Martin-West. 2018. "Stockton Economic Empowerment Demonstration." AEA RCT Registry. December 19. https://www.socialscienceregistry.org/trials/3655/history/39195
Sponsors & Partners

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information
Experimental Details

Interventions

Intervention(s)
The Stockton Economic Empowerment Demonstration (SEED) is the country’s first city-led guaranteed income (GI) pilot. It is a collaboration between the Office of Mayor Michael Tubbs, the Economic Security Project (ESP), and the residents of Stockton. In 2019, SEED will begin providing at least 100 Stocktonians with a GI of 500 USD per month for 18 months. The income will be distributed monthly through prepaid debit cards that will be issued in each recipient’s name. Since the income is “guaranteed,” there are no work requirements or restrictions on how the money can be spent.
Intervention Start Date
2019-02-15
Intervention End Date
2020-08-14

Primary Outcomes

Primary Outcomes (end points)
The overall aim of this research is to determine the effect of treatment (GI) on the the primary outcomes. These include changes in financial well-being, psychological distress, and physical functioning.
Primary Outcomes (explanation)
We hypothesize that the intervention will produce detectable reductions in income volatility and unsecured debt. Income volatility data will be measured monthly through self-reporting and calculated by the coefficient of variation, similar to the method used by the U.S. Financial Diaries study. To determine the coefficient of variation, we will divide the standard deviation of monthly income by the mean of monthly income (Morduch ll & Siwicki, 2017). Monthly income volatility will be measured at nine observation points across the study using retrospective questioning in the online survey to produce 24 data points. Income volatility data will also be triangulated through text-based responses at key time points. Use of the coefficient of variation will allow for comparisons of volatility of both higher and lower income households. In the literature on low income households, the coefficient of variation for income volatility typically ranges from .31 to .41, with a mean of .36 and standard deviation of .50.
We chose debt reduction due to descriptive evidence suggesting that when provided a cash transfer in the form of a one-time lump amount such as the EITC, a matched savings disbursement, or the Alaska Permanent Fund dividend, individuals use that money to pay down debt (Harstad, 2017; Shaefer, Song, ll & Shanks, 2013; Halpern-Meekin, Edin, Tach, ll & Sykes, 2015). Debt reduction will be measured through selected questions from the Survey of Consumer Finances (2016) related to unsecured debt, including debt from credit cards, education loans, and medical bills.
The health indicators of physical functioning and psychological distress will be collected quantitatively via the SF-36 and the Kessler 10 (RAND Corporation, 2018; Kessler, et al., 2002) within a longitudinal survey and through in-depth qualitative interviews. This outcome was chosen because of empirical evidence that involuntary job loss, inadequate or insecure employment, and other proxies of income volatility are related to greater risk and severity of depressive symptoms (Catalano, et al., 2010; Rohde, Tang, Osber, ll & Rao, 2016) as well as qualitative evidence indicating some association of income volatility proxies to accounts of substantial anxiety (Morduch & Schneider, 2017; Halpern-Meekin, Edin, Tach, & Sykes, 2015).

Secondary Outcomes

Secondary Outcomes (end points)
While there is more limited theoretical or empirical evidence for these secondary outcomes, they were selected because of their importance in providing insight into the wellbeing of Stocktonians, their representation in the literature and potential for detectable effects. Time use will be measured by time spent on employment, care work, education, and community or civic engagement, and selected questions will be drawn from the American Time Use Survey (U.S. Department of Labor Statistics, 2011). Family dynamics and parenting will be measured via the Confusion, Hubbub, and Order Scale (Matheny, 1995). Food security will measured through the Household Food Insecurity Access Scale (Coates, Swindale, & Bilinksy, 2007). Material hardship will be measured via selected questions from the Survey of Income and Program Participation (SIPP, 2008). Agency will be measured through the Hope Scale (Snyder et. al., 1991). Perceived stress and well-being will be measured by the Perceived Stress Scale (Cohen, Kamark, & Mermelstein,1994) and the Mattering Index (Elliot, Kao, ll & Grant, 2004). Additional secondary outcomes related to the use of public benefits, healthcare utilization, and interactions with the child welfare system will be assessed via administrative data collection in partnership with the Children’s Data Network at the University of Southern California (USC) School of Social Work.
Secondary Outcomes (explanation)

Experimental Design

Experimental Design
The project relies on a randomized controlled trial with parallel mixed methods
design (QUAN + QUAL), containing quantitative and qualitative research
strands anchored by participatory action research (PAR), and informed by
evidence-based learning agendas (Teddlie Tashakkori, 2008; Urban Institute,
2018). Data from each strand will be integrated at the conclusion of the intervention
and will inform the dissemination strategy alongside the purposive
political sample (Miles Huberman, 1994; Teddlie Tashakkori, 2008).
Experimental Design Details
Randomization Method
Addressed based random sampling
Randomization Unit
Individual
Was the treatment clustered?
No

Experiment Characteristics

Sample size: planned number of clusters
1000 individuals
Sample size: planned number of observations
9
Sample size (or number of clusters) by treatment arms
130 in treatment, 200 in active control, 670 in passive or administrative control
Minimum detectable effect size for main outcomes (accounting for sample design and clustering)
IRB

Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)

IRB Name
University of Tennessee Institutional Review Board
IRB Approval Date
2018-11-28
IRB Approval Number
UTK IRB-18-042824-XP
Analysis Plan

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information

Post-Trial

Post Trial Information

Study Withdrawal

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information

Intervention

Is the intervention completed?
No
Data Collection Complete
Data Publication

Data Publication

Is public data available?
No

Program Files

Program Files
Reports, Papers & Other Materials

Relevant Paper(s)

Reports & Other Materials