What Kind of Teachers Are Schools Looking For? Evidence from a Randomized Field Experiment

Last registered on December 21, 2018

Pre-Trial

Trial Information

General Information

Title
What Kind of Teachers Are Schools Looking For? Evidence from a Randomized Field Experiment
RCT ID
AEARCTR-0003672
Initial registration date
December 19, 2018

Initial registration date is when the trial was registered.

It corresponds to when the registration was submitted to the Registry to be reviewed for publication.

First published
December 21, 2018, 10:58 PM EST

First published corresponds to when the trial was first made public on the Registry after being reviewed.

Locations

Region

Primary Investigator

Affiliation
Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland

Other Primary Investigator(s)

Additional Trial Information

Status
Completed
Start date
2012-06-01
End date
2012-08-31
Secondary IDs
Abstract
Teacher quality is a pressing public policy concern, yet little is known about the hiring process. This paper reports the results of an experiment in which public, private, and charter schools throughout the United States were sent resumes with randomly-selected characteristics from fictitious applicants for teaching positions. The pattern of callbacks suggests that an applicant's academic background has little impact on the likelihood of success at private and charter schools, although public schools respond more favorably to candidates from more selective colleges. Private schools demonstrate a slight preference for female candidates. All three sectors demonstrate a preference for in-state candidates.
External Link(s)

Registration Citation

Citation
Hinrichs, Peter. 2018. "What Kind of Teachers Are Schools Looking For? Evidence from a Randomized Field Experiment." AEA RCT Registry. December 21. https://doi.org/10.1257/rct.3672-1.0
Former Citation
Hinrichs, Peter. 2018. "What Kind of Teachers Are Schools Looking For? Evidence from a Randomized Field Experiment." AEA RCT Registry. December 21. https://www.socialscienceregistry.org/trials/3672/history/39509
Experimental Details

Interventions

Intervention(s)
Intervention Start Date
2012-06-01
Intervention End Date
2012-08-31

Primary Outcomes

Primary Outcomes (end points)
1) callbacks 2) interview requests
Primary Outcomes (explanation)

Secondary Outcomes

Secondary Outcomes (end points)
Secondary Outcomes (explanation)

Experimental Design

Experimental Design
Described in Section III of the paper, which is available online as Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland Working Paper 14-36.
Experimental Design Details
Randomization Method
randomization done in office by a computer
Randomization Unit
schools
Was the treatment clustered?
Yes

Experiment Characteristics

Sample size: planned number of clusters
3,000
Sample size: planned number of observations
6,000
Sample size (or number of clusters) by treatment arms
There are several different sets of treatments. For high/medium/low GPA there are roughly 2,000 observations per treatment. For high/medium/low college selectivity there are roughly 2,000 observations per treatment. For male/female there are roughly 3,000 observations per treatment. For in-state/out-of-state there are roughly 4,500 in-state and 1,500 out-of-state.
Minimum detectable effect size for main outcomes (accounting for sample design and clustering)
IRB

Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)

IRB Name
Georgetown University
IRB Approval Date
Details not available
IRB Approval Number
The IRB deemed my study "not subject to review" on the grounds that schools are not human subjects.

Post-Trial

Post Trial Information

Study Withdrawal

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information

Intervention

Is the intervention completed?
No
Data Collection Complete
Data Publication

Data Publication

Is public data available?
No

Program Files

Program Files
Reports, Papers & Other Materials

Relevant Paper(s)

Reports & Other Materials