| Field | Before | After |
|---|---|---|
| Field Study Withdrawn | Before | After No |
| Field Intervention Completion Date | Before | After June 14, 2019 |
| Field Data Collection Complete | Before | After Yes |
| Field Final Sample Size: Number of Clusters (Unit of Randomization) | Before | After 190 |
| Field Was attrition correlated with treatment status? | Before | After No |
| Field Final Sample Size: Total Number of Observations | Before | After 190 |
| Field Final Sample Size (or Number of Clusters) by Treatment Arms | Before | After 190 |
| Field Is there a restricted access data set available on request? | Before | After No |
| Field Program Files | Before | After No |
| Field Data Collection Completion Date | Before | After June 14, 2019 |
| Field Is data available for public use? | Before | After No |
| Field | Before | After |
|---|---|---|
| Field Paper Abstract | Before | After We study the role of advice in sustaining gender differences in labour market outcomes. We conducted a laboratory experiment in which “advisers” advise “workers” to choose between a more ambitious and a less ambitious task based on the worker’s subjective self-assessment. We expected female workers to be less confident and advisers to hold gender stereotypes, leading to a gender bias in advice. However, we find no evidence that women are less confident or that advice is gender-biased. Our results contribute to our understanding of the mechanisms driving gender differences in the labor market. They also call for caution when making general interpretations of research findings pointing to a gender bias in specific settings. |
| Field Paper Citation | Before | After Silva Goncalves, Juliana and Roel van Veldhuizen (2020): Subjective Judgment and Gender Bias in Advice: Evidence from the Laboratory. Life Course Centre Working Paper No. 2020-29 |
| Field Paper URL | Before | After https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3748191 |