| Field | Before | After |
|---|---|---|
| Field Last Published | Before July 17, 2019 03:33 AM | After July 17, 2019 03:36 AM |
| Field Study Withdrawn | Before | After No |
| Field Intervention Completion Date | Before | After June 19, 2019 |
| Field Data Collection Complete | Before | After Yes |
| Field Final Sample Size: Number of Clusters (Unit of Randomization) | Before | After 81 students |
| Field Was attrition correlated with treatment status? | Before | After No |
| Field Final Sample Size: Total Number of Observations | Before | After 81 students |
| Field Is there a restricted access data set available on request? | Before | After Yes |
| Field Restricted Data Contact | Before | After [email protected] |
| Field Program Files | Before | After No |
| Field Data Collection Completion Date | Before | After June 19, 2019 |
| Field Is data available for public use? | Before | After No |
| Field | Before | After |
|---|---|---|
| Field Paper Abstract | Before | After This paper studies the influence of framing on the relationship between trading in a transparenttrading environment (a "scopic regime") and the disposition effect. In principle, the recent literature agreesthat social interactions alter investors’ disposition effect. However, while some studies argue the dispositioneffect increases in a social environment, others provide evidence that the disposition effect decreases undera scopic regime. We show that the framing of the decision problem on social trading platforms affects thesign on this relationship, and thereby synthesize the existing findings. Individuals alter their behavior tooptimize their social image under the given framing. |
| Field Paper URL | Before | After https://wiwi.uni-paderborn.de/fileadmin/cetar/TAF_Working_Paper_Series/TAF_WP_043_MinhLyPelster_2019.pdf |