Moral Balancing in Sustainable Behavior

Last registered on June 05, 2023

Pre-Trial

Trial Information

General Information

Title
Moral Balancing in Sustainable Behavior
RCT ID
AEARCTR-0004335
Initial registration date
June 20, 2019

Initial registration date is when the trial was registered.

It corresponds to when the registration was submitted to the Registry to be reviewed for publication.

First published
September 02, 2019, 1:15 PM EDT

First published corresponds to when the trial was first made public on the Registry after being reviewed.

Last updated
June 05, 2023, 3:28 AM EDT

Last updated is the most recent time when changes to the trial's registration were published.

Locations

Region

Primary Investigator

Affiliation
University of Bochum

Other Primary Investigator(s)

PI Affiliation
PI Affiliation
PI Affiliation

Additional Trial Information

Status
Withdrawn
Start date
2019-06-20
End date
2019-06-22
Secondary IDs
Prior work
This trial does not extend or rely on any prior RCTs.
Abstract
During the “Kirchentag 2019”, a bi-anual festival of the protestant church in Germany with around 200,000 visitors, we investigate the role of the environmental self-image of agents for engaging in climate change mitigation. In a real-effort task at a fair stand of the festival, subjects can generate donations that offset carbon dioxide emissions. Prior to the task, subjects are either positively or negatively manipulated in their environmental self-image. The donations generated in these interventions are compared to a control group. We test whether the manipulation of the environmental self-image induces moral balancing effects (cleansing/licensing) or leads to consistency. Further, we try to determine heterogeneous treatment effects for High and Low environmental/religious types and to test for the impact of type uncertainty on balancing behavior as suggested in the theoretical work of Bénabou and Tirole 2011.
In a second experiment subsequent to the real-effort task, we investigate whether subjects use narratives to justify their effort provision. More precisely, we test if subjects publicly misreport their beliefs about social norms and/or the impact of the real-effort task to enhance their social image.
External Link(s)

Registration Citation

Citation
Feldhaus, Christoph et al. 2023. "Moral Balancing in Sustainable Behavior." AEA RCT Registry. June 05. https://doi.org/10.1257/rct.4335-1.1
Former Citation
Feldhaus, Christoph et al. 2023. "Moral Balancing in Sustainable Behavior." AEA RCT Registry. June 05. https://www.socialscienceregistry.org/trials/4335/history/181661
Experimental Details

Interventions

Intervention(s)
Intervention Start Date
2019-06-20
Intervention End Date
2019-06-22

Primary Outcomes

Primary Outcomes (end points)
Effort measured in time – provided by holding a small earth with stretched arms.
Primary Outcomes (explanation)

Secondary Outcomes

Secondary Outcomes (end points)
Incentivized estimation of the social norm and the impact of the real-effort task (the amount of carbon compensated).
Secondary Outcomes (explanation)

Experimental Design

Experimental Design
During the “Kirchentag 2019”, a bi-anual festival of the protestant church in Germany with around 200,000 visitors, we investigate the role of the environmental self-image of agents for engaging in climate change mitigation. In a real-effort task at a fair stand of the festival, subjects can generate donations that offset carbon dioxide emissions. Prior to the task, subjects are either positively or negatively manipulated in their environmental self-image.
Experimental Design Details
Randomization Method
Lottery
Randomization Unit
Individual
Was the treatment clustered?
No

Experiment Characteristics

Sample size: planned number of clusters
No clusters.
Sample size: planned number of observations
We are sampling during all opening ours of the festival, that is for three days and 7 hours per day. We try to maximize sample size within this time frame and expect between 300 and 800 subjects.
Sample size (or number of clusters) by treatment arms
The sample is equally allocated.
Minimum detectable effect size for main outcomes (accounting for sample design and clustering)
IRB

Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)

IRB Name
IRB Approval Date
IRB Approval Number
Analysis Plan

Analysis Plan Documents

GHFL_PAP_IdentityandVoluntaryEffortsforClimateProtection

MD5: 38275bc140e4cea04a75f1c9c6d3161b

SHA1: f31431e60627befba37ec4c0a65acd7aa47457f0

Uploaded At: September 02, 2019

Post-Trial

Post Trial Information

Study Withdrawal

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information

Intervention

Is the intervention completed?
No
Data Collection Complete
Data Publication

Data Publication

Is public data available?
No

Program Files

Program Files
Reports, Papers & Other Materials

Relevant Paper(s)

Reports & Other Materials