The Impact of Information on Political Preferences

Last registered on July 03, 2019

Pre-Trial

Trial Information

General Information

Title
The Impact of Information on Political Preferences
RCT ID
AEARCTR-0004404
Initial registration date
July 02, 2019

Initial registration date is when the trial was registered.

It corresponds to when the registration was submitted to the Registry to be reviewed for publication.

First published
July 03, 2019, 3:20 PM EDT

First published corresponds to when the trial was first made public on the Registry after being reviewed.

Locations

Region

Primary Investigator

Affiliation
Texas A&M University

Other Primary Investigator(s)

PI Affiliation
Universidad de las Americas

Additional Trial Information

Status
On going
Start date
2019-05-01
End date
2019-12-31
Secondary IDs
Abstract
In order to avoid experimenter demand effects, we describe the study in fields that will not become public until after the experiment is over.
External Link(s)

Registration Citation

Citation
McNamara, Trent and Roberto Mosquera. 2019. "The Impact of Information on Political Preferences." AEA RCT Registry. July 03. https://doi.org/10.1257/rct.4404-1.0
Former Citation
McNamara, Trent and Roberto Mosquera. 2019. "The Impact of Information on Political Preferences." AEA RCT Registry. July 03. https://www.socialscienceregistry.org/trials/4404/history/49288
Experimental Details

Interventions

Intervention(s)
Intervention (Hidden)
Recruitment occurs in three waves. To test for statistical power, we ran a pilot wave(n=100) in May 2019. Then, in July 2019 we will run the second wave (n=1,000). In this wave, we randomize treatment and estimate effects. Finally, conditional on funding, we will run a third wave in September 2019 intended to detect smaller behavioral changes that individuals may report. In our main estimates, we will pool all three waves and include a wave fixed effect in order to control for any wave-specific differences. We recruit from two different populations. First, we use Amazon’s Mechanical Turk population (MTurk) in order to crowd-source responses from an active and online community(waves 1 and 2). This also gives us a representative sample from across the United States during the Summer of 2019. Second, for wave 3 we plan to recruit from an alternative population to extend the external validity of the results.

Upon starting the survey, participants are asked a variety of demographic questions. This includes gathering information on gender, age, political orientation, and political preferences.Following this, participants are sequentially asked two things for two different types of government spending. First, for a given $100, how much they would prefer to have allocated between the two categories. This provides a measure of an individual’s preferred spending allocation,Pi. Second, how much they believe is actually being allocated to each. This gives a measure of an individual’s expectations, Ei, capturing what how think the government is actually distributing between the two categories. The difference between Pi and Ei provides an initial measure of polarization. In practice, the two categories that a participants chooses between are “Welfare and Government Assistance Programs” and “Military, Defense, and Homeland Security”. These categories are chosen due to the fact that they draw polar views despite being funded similarly (Oldendick and Hendren, 2018).After this, we randomly assign individuals into either a treatment or control group. The control group is shown their difference between Pi and Ei and is then simply required to finish answering outcome questions. The treatment group is similarly shown their difference between Pi and Ei but is also assigned an information intervention described below.

Our experimental design induces either an increase or a decrease in an individual’s degree of polarization. The directional change is dependent on the individual’s initial beliefs and expectations regarding the allocation of government spending. We randomize an information intervention that reveals to treated participants the real allocation, R, between the two categories. By doing so, depending on an individual’s initial Pi and Ei, participants are treated with either a reduction in polarization, an increase in polarization, or no change in polarization.
Intervention Start Date
2019-07-08
Intervention End Date
2019-07-15

Primary Outcomes

Primary Outcomes (end points)
See the analysis plan for more information.
Primary Outcomes (explanation)
See the analysis plan for more information.

Secondary Outcomes

Secondary Outcomes (end points)
Secondary Outcomes (explanation)

Experimental Design

Experimental Design
In order to avoid experimenter demand effects, we describe this in the field that will not become public until after the experiment is over.
Experimental Design Details
See the analysis plan for more information.
Randomization Method
Randomization will be implemented through Qualtrics.
Randomization Unit
Individual
Was the treatment clustered?
No

Experiment Characteristics

Sample size: planned number of clusters
1000 individuals
Sample size: planned number of observations
1000 individuals
Sample size (or number of clusters) by treatment arms
See the analysis plan for more information.
Minimum detectable effect size for main outcomes (accounting for sample design and clustering)
See the analysis plan for more information.
IRB

Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)

IRB Name
Texas A&M IRB
IRB Approval Date
2019-04-16
IRB Approval Number
IRB2018-1633D
Analysis Plan

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information

Post-Trial

Post Trial Information

Study Withdrawal

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information

Intervention

Is the intervention completed?
No
Data Collection Complete
Data Publication

Data Publication

Is public data available?
No

Program Files

Program Files
Reports, Papers & Other Materials

Relevant Paper(s)

Reports & Other Materials