| Field | Before | After |
|---|---|---|
| Field Trial Status | Before on_going | After completed |
| Field Abstract | Before Abstract The objective of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of Transdiagnostic Group Therapy on Women with Multiple Sclerosis. | After Abstract The objective of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of Transdiagnostic Group Therapy on Women with Multiple Sclerosis. Anxiety is highly comorbid with depression, but little is known about the impact of anxiety disorders on the effectiveness of empirically supported psychotherapies for depression. We examined such outcomes for people.The prevalence of both anxiety and depressive the group examined in this study, in which lifetime prevalence and MDD is around 50% . As in medically healthy people, the consequences of these disorders for people with MS include higher risk for suicide . |
| Field Last Published | Before August 09, 2019 03:39 PM | After August 12, 2019 04:28 AM |
| Field Intervention (Public) | Before The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy of the unified protocol transdiagnostic cognitive behavior therapy (tCBT) as a treatment for multiple sclerosis (MS) fatigue. A randomized controlled design was used where 72 patients with MS fatigue were randomly assigned to eight weekly sessions of tCBT or relaxation training (RT). Participants were assessed before and after treatment, and at 3 post-treatment. | After The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy of the unified protocol transdiagnostic cognitive behavior therapy (tCBT) as a treatment for multiple sclerosis (MS) fatigue. A randomized controlled design was used where 72 patients with MS fatigue were randomly assigned to 14 weekly sessions of tCBT . Participants were assessed before and after treatment, and at 3 months after post-treatment. |
| Field | Before | After |
|---|---|---|
| Field Custom Type | Before Emotion | After |
| Field File | Before | After |
| Field Description | Before comprises two mood scales, one that measures positive affect and the other, which measures the negative effect. Used as a psychometric scale, the PANAS can show relations between positive and negative affect with personality stats and traits. Ten descriptors are used for each PA scale and NA to define their meanings. | After comprises two mood scales, one that measures positive affect and the other, which measures the negative effect. Used as a psychometric scale, the PANAS can show relations between positive and negative affect with personality stats and traits. Ten descriptors are used for each PA scale and NA to define their meanings.The PANAS Scale or Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) is a self-report questionnaire. The list is split up into two segments, or mood scales. One scale measures a person's positive emotion and the other scale measures the negative. Scoring: Positive Affect Score: Add the scores on items 1, 3, 5, 9, 10, 12, 14, 16, 17, and 19. Scores can range from 10 – 50, with higher scores representing higher levels of positive affect. Mean Scores: 33.3 (SD±7.2) Negative Affect Score: Add the scores on items 2, 4, 6, 7, 8, 11, 13, 15, 18, and 20. Scores can range from 10 – 50, with lower scores representing lower levels of negative affect. Mean Score: 17.4 (SD ± 6.2) Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. Journal of personality and social psychology, 54(6), 1063. |
| Field | Before | After |
|---|---|---|
| Field Custom Type | Before Cognitive | After |
| Field Description | Before The SMQ measures an individual’s ability to observe and accept their emotional reactions nonjudgmentally, and to let those reactions pass; scores range from 0–96. | After he SMQ 16 items are scored on a 7-point Likert scale, worded ‘strongly disagree’ (0) to ‘strongly agree’ (6), yielding a total range of 0–96. Eight items are framed positively, eight negatively. The SMQ had good internal consistency, adequate concurrent validity, discriminated between meditators, non-meditators and those with a psychosis, and was significantly correlated with mood rating. Data indicated a single factor structure. Those with currently distressing psychosis were less mindful than non-clinical participants (mediators or non mediators), with degree of mindfulness inversely related to intensity of delusional experience |
| Field | Before | After |
|---|---|---|
| Field Custom Type | Before Emotion | After |
| Field File | Before | After |
| Field Description | Before Grass et all 2003 6 subscale 36 item | After Grass et all 2003 6 subscale 36 items Higher scores suggest greater problems with emotion regulation. The measure yields a total score (SUM) as well as scores on six sub-scales: 1. Non-acceptance of emotional responses (NONACCEPT) 2. Difficulties engaging in goal directed behaviour (GOALS ) 3. Impulse control difficulties (IMPULSE) 4. Lack of emotional awareness (AWARE) 5. Limited access to emotion regulation strategies (STRATEGIES) 6. Lack of emotional clarity (CLARITY) |
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Field Document Name | Value Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (ERQ-R) |
| Field Custom Type | Value ER |
| Field File |
Value
Document+_2_.docx
MD5:
f2ac2cc80060a6efe79191fa5ab02382
SHA1:
152e9beb37f1f47e0212d054fe1f14cebe0dfd72
|
| Field Description | Value It is a two-factor measure of emotion regulation involving six 'cognitive Reappraisal ' items that tap into the ability to redefine a situation deemed , |
| Field Public | Value Yes |