x

NEW UPDATE: Completed trials may now upload and register supplementary documents (e.g. null results reports, populated pre-analysis plans, or post-trial results reports) in the Post Trial section under Reports, Papers, & Other Materials.
Criminal Identity and Social Networks
Last registered on August 02, 2019

Pre-Trial

Trial Information
General Information
Title
Criminal Identity and Social Networks
RCT ID
AEARCTR-0004489
Initial registration date
July 31, 2019
Last updated
August 02, 2019 3:35 PM EDT
Location(s)

This section is unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access to this information.

Request Information
Primary Investigator
Affiliation
Central Washington University
Other Primary Investigator(s)
Additional Trial Information
Status
In development
Start date
2020-07-01
End date
2022-07-15
Secondary IDs
Abstract
This research aims to investigate the relationship between identity of current and former inmates (how inmates see themselves) and their social networks (people in inmates’ lives). Such a relationship has implications for their criminal behavior. This project is vital to the understanding, intervention, and prevention of criminal behavior. Academically, the research will link sociological social psychology, social network analysis, and criminology. This project will reveal mechanisms of the interaction between inmates’ identities and social networks and predict identity salience (likelihood of certain identity activation) with network characteristics.
Primary data are interviews and surveys and analyzed qualitatively. The primary findings are: first, family serves as supporter or enabler of criminal behavior. Sometimes peer groups and perpetrators of the focal person are surrogates of family in the absence of the family. Second, inmates identify themselves as a “disappointing” member to their family and other inmates as “bad” people which suggests that they have internalized the dichotomy used by the larger society when judging inmates and others by turning to two generalized others: their family and the larger society.
I plan to collect 1,000 more responses with former inmates (500) and current inmates (500) and 30 more interviews (20 with former inmates and 10 with current inmates). I have obtained IRB approval to interview and survey former inmates. I have received a research solicitation letter and I am applying for access. I anticipate the survey data targeting the current and former inmate populations will continue to be relevant to this topic.
External Link(s)
Registration Citation
Citation
Zhang, Baiqing. 2019. "Criminal Identity and Social Networks." AEA RCT Registry. August 02. https://doi.org/10.1257/rct.4489-1.0.
Former Citation
Zhang, Baiqing. 2019. "Criminal Identity and Social Networks." AEA RCT Registry. August 02. http://www.socialscienceregistry.org/trials/4489/history/51109.
Experimental Details
Interventions
Intervention(s)
Initiatives to treat issues among inmates such as substance use and mental issues.
Intervention Start Date
2020-07-15
Intervention End Date
2022-07-01
Primary Outcomes
Primary Outcomes (end points)
Criminal identity salience reduction which indicates the possibility of recidivism.
Primary Outcomes (explanation)
Identity salience is measured with a series of question such as how often a person talks about a specific question.
Secondary Outcomes
Secondary Outcomes (end points)
Criminal identity prominence which indicates how important emotionally criminal identity is.
Secondary Outcomes (explanation)
Identity prominence is measured with a series of questions such as how important a specific question is to a person. Identity prominence is often causally related with identity salience.
Experimental Design
Experimental Design
The treatment group will receive crime reduction treatments. The control group will consist of people who receive alternative treatments.
Experimental Design Details
Not available
Randomization Method
Will randomly assign participants through a computer program or public lottery without replacement.
Randomization Unit
Individuals.
Was the treatment clustered?
No
Experiment Characteristics
Sample size: planned number of clusters
500 individuals from a facility.
Sample size: planned number of observations
500 individuals
Sample size (or number of clusters) by treatment arms
250 program treatment, 250 control
Minimum detectable effect size for main outcomes (accounting for sample design and clustering)
150
IRB
INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARDS (IRBs)
IRB Name
IRB Approval Date
IRB Approval Number