x

We are happy to announce that all trial registrations will now be issued DOIs (digital object identifiers). For more information, see here.
Morals in multi-unit markets
Last registered on September 16, 2019

Pre-Trial

Trial Information
General Information
Title
Morals in multi-unit markets
RCT ID
AEARCTR-0004603
Initial registration date
September 15, 2019
Last updated
September 16, 2019 1:55 PM EDT
Location(s)

This section is unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access to this information.

Request Information
Primary Investigator
Affiliation
Other Primary Investigator(s)
PI Affiliation
University of Amsterdam
PI Affiliation
University of Amsterdam
Additional Trial Information
Status
In development
Start date
2019-09-15
End date
2020-06-30
Secondary IDs
Abstract
The result that markets erode morals (Falk & Szech, 2013) has recently been challenged (for instance by Bartling et al., 2019). Recent experiments on norm erosion restrict market participants to trade at most one unit. This choice might limit the extent to which market forces facilitate selfish behavior and outcomes. In this project, we study markets with multi-unit trading. We establish whether the moral concerns of traders are reflected in market outcomes to the degree that is theoretically predicted and whether there is norm erosion in markets by comparing valuations of a charity donation in individual decision-making to the valuations in markets with single and multi-unit trading.
External Link(s)
Registration Citation
Citation
Offerman, Theo, Giorgia Romagnoli and Andreas Ziegler. 2019. "Morals in multi-unit markets." AEA RCT Registry. September 16. https://doi.org/10.1257/rct.4603-1.0.
Sponsors & Partners

There are documents in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access to this information.

Request Information
Experimental Details
Interventions
Intervention(s)
Intervention Start Date
2019-09-15
Intervention End Date
2019-10-31
Primary Outcomes
Primary Outcomes (end points)
There are two main outcome dimensions in this experiment:

• Individual valuations of a charity donation, directly elicited from participants in individual choices or inferred from bid and ask prices and accepted offers in markets. In these markets, trading produces an externality by reducing donations to a charity.

• Traded quantities in the markets.

Primary Outcomes (explanation)
For a detailed explanation of out outcome variables, see the analysis plan.
Secondary Outcomes
Secondary Outcomes (end points)
We compare social norms about appropriative behavior in- and outside of markets and subjects' beliefs about the median valuation of the donation between treatments.
Secondary Outcomes (explanation)
Experimental Design
Experimental Design
We run four treatments: IDM, SINGLE, MULTI and FULL. SINGLE, MULTI and FULL are three types of markets, where the total number of tradeable units change (5 in SINGLE, 15 in MULTI and FULL), as well as the maximum number of tradeable units per trader (1 in SINGLE, 3 in MULTI and 15 in FULL).
Experimental Design Details
Not available
Randomization Method
Computerized randomization.
Randomization Unit
Subjects are first randomly allocated to one of the market treatments or the individual-decision making (computerized). For market treatments, subjects are then randomly allocated to a group (computerized), and subsequently each group is assigned a treatment.
Was the treatment clustered?
Yes
Experiment Characteristics
Sample size: planned number of clusters
10 groups with 10 subjects each per market treatment. No clustering in individual decision making.
Sample size: planned number of observations
380 subjects
Sample size (or number of clusters) by treatment arms
For the three market treatments (SINGLE, MULTI, FULL), we aim for 10 groups with 10 subjects each (3*10*10=300 subjects). For IDM, we aim for 80 subjects (for this treatment, each subject provides one independent observation). If we run out of subjects before we reach these targets, we will collect as many observations as we can.
Minimum detectable effect size for main outcomes (accounting for sample design and clustering)
IRB
INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARDS (IRBs)
IRB Name
Economics & Business Ethics Committee (University of Amsterdam)
IRB Approval Date
2019-06-17
IRB Approval Number
EC 20190617030625
Analysis Plan

There are documents in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access to this information.

Request Information