Rules of Thumb: Providing Timely Useful Financial Management Advice at Scale

Last registered on May 02, 2017

Pre-Trial

Trial Information

General Information

Title
Rules of Thumb: Providing Timely Useful Financial Management Advice at Scale
RCT ID
AEARCTR-0000466
Initial registration date
August 05, 2014
Last updated
May 02, 2017, 1:43 PM EDT

Locations

Region

Primary Investigator

Affiliation
MIT

Other Primary Investigator(s)

PI Affiliation
HBS

Additional Trial Information

Status
Completed
Start date
2014-08-04
End date
2017-03-31
Secondary IDs
Abstract
Microentrepreneurs in developing countries face complex financial management challenges. Many entrepreneurs do not have the financial skills to address these challenges and traditional classroom-based financial training has not been shown effective in changing behavior or improving financial outcomes. Wha t is the most effective way to equip microentrepreneurs with the necessary skills to address their financial management challenges? Traditional financial education curricula have shown very mixed results for improving knowledge and financial practices among microentrepreneurs. In this study, the researchers build on earlier work by one of the authors that shows the promise of using a simple, heuristics-based financial education curriculum. In the current project the researchers test whether it is feasible to communicate these heuristics via mobile phone messages in a scalable and sustainable fashion. Carefully designed messages that are simple to understand and adopt will be sent at particularly useful times to optimize effectiveness. The study will measure the impact of this strategy on the financial management behavior and business outcomes of microentrepreneurs.
External Link(s)

Registration Citation

Citation
, and Antoinette Schoar. 2017. "Rules of Thumb: Providing Timely Useful Financial Management Advice at Scale." AEA RCT Registry. May 02. https://doi.org/10.1257/rct.466-2.0
Former Citation
, , Antoinette Schoar and Antoinette Schoar. 2017. "Rules of Thumb: Providing Timely Useful Financial Management Advice at Scale." AEA RCT Registry. May 02. https://www.socialscienceregistry.org/trials/466/history/17096
Experimental Details

Interventions

Intervention(s)
Intervention Start Date
2014-09-22
Intervention End Date
2015-08-22

Primary Outcomes

Primary Outcomes (end points)
The outcomes that will be studied through this experiment:
Can rules-of-thumb delivered over the phone be efficient in fostering behavioral change with microentrepreneurs?
What effects do rules-of-thumb and mobile-based financial training have on firm profitability and productivity, in the short and medium run?
What is the mechanism by which rules-of-thumb leads to different outcomes?
Are there heterogeneous treatment effects of such a service?
Can mobile-based advice for MSMEs be developed as a sustainable business model?
Primary Outcomes (explanation)

Secondary Outcomes

Secondary Outcomes (end points)
Secondary Outcomes (explanation)

Experimental Design

Experimental Design
We will be using a randomized control trial. The treatment group will receive business advice via mobile phones, while the control group will not receive any business advice. The treatment will comprise of easy-to-remember and actionable heuristics on financial and business management. We will deliver this set of advice through text and voice messages sent directly to the mobile phones of the microentrepreneurs. The core of our work will focus on how to deliver rules-of-thumb content through an easy to deliver mobile platform. The impact of business advice will be measured through baseline, midline and endline surveys that collect business and household financial data.
Experimental Design Details
Randomization Method
Randomization will be done in the office by a computer.
Randomization Unit
Randomization will be done at the level of the individual.
Was the treatment clustered?
No

Experiment Characteristics

Sample size: planned number of clusters
n/a
Sample size: planned number of observations
1950 individuals
Sample size (or number of clusters) by treatment arms
1950 individuals
Minimum detectable effect size for main outcomes (accounting for sample design and clustering)
IRB

Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)

IRB Name
Study has received IRB approval. Details not available.
IRB Approval Date
Details not available
IRB Approval Number
Details not available

Post-Trial

Post Trial Information

Study Withdrawal

There are documents in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access to this information.

Request Information

Intervention

Is the intervention completed?
Yes
Intervention Completion Date
November 30, 2015, 12:00 +00:00
Data Collection Complete
Yes
Data Collection Completion Date
March 05, 2016, 12:00 +00:00
Final Sample Size: Number of Clusters (Unit of Randomization)
n/a
Was attrition correlated with treatment status?
Yes
Final Sample Size: Total Number of Observations
2,207 individuals
Final Sample Size (or Number of Clusters) by Treatment Arms
1,041 treatment and 1,002 control Rest of the businesses were inactive. Note that the baseline number of units was 2,474 individuals as compared to the 2,207 individuals. Additionally, note that attrition was correlated with treatment status as 267 of the businesses were shut down with 64% (171) from the treatment group and 36% (116) from the control group.
Data Publication

Data Publication

Is public data available?
No

Program Files

Program Files
No
Reports, Papers & Other Materials

Relevant Paper(s)

Reports & Other Materials