Elicit preferences in the entrepreneurial financing process

Last registered on October 17, 2020

Pre-Trial

Trial Information

General Information

Title
Elicit preferences in the entrepreneurial financing process
RCT ID
AEARCTR-0004982
Initial registration date
February 01, 2020

Initial registration date is when the trial was registered.

It corresponds to when the registration was submitted to the Registry to be reviewed for publication.

First published
February 07, 2020, 3:48 PM EST

First published corresponds to when the trial was first made public on the Registry after being reviewed.

Last updated
October 17, 2020, 11:05 PM EDT

Last updated is the most recent time when changes to the trial's registration were published.

Locations

Primary Investigator

Affiliation
Columbia University

Other Primary Investigator(s)

Additional Trial Information

Status
In development
Start date
2020-02-01
End date
2020-12-31
Secondary IDs
Abstract
Startups are crucial to the innovation and development of an economy. However, many startups face difficulties in terms of raising funding for their projects. In this project, we use field experiments and unique databases to provide causal empirical evidence for identifying potential frictions in the entrepreneurial financing process.
External Link(s)

Registration Citation

Citation
Zhang, Ye. 2020. "Elicit preferences in the entrepreneurial financing process." AEA RCT Registry. October 17. https://doi.org/10.1257/rct.4982-1.2000000000000002
Sponsors & Partners

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information
Experimental Details

Interventions

Intervention(s)
Individual-level randomized intervention is implemented.
Intervention Start Date
2020-02-01
Intervention End Date
2020-10-31

Primary Outcomes

Primary Outcomes (end points)
Investors' evaluation, behaviors
Startups' evaluation, feedback
Primary Outcomes (explanation)
Primary outcomes are direct measurements rather than synthetic outcomes.

Secondary Outcomes

Secondary Outcomes (end points)
Secondary Outcomes (explanation)

Experimental Design

Experimental Design
The experiment design contains a series of field experiments.
Experimental Design Details
Outcomes:
Experiment 1: Email Correspondence Test
Test:
First order effect: gender, race, education, startup comparative advantages or the ESG criteria (startup quality)
Interaction Effect: gender by race, gender by education, gender by quality, and other interaction effects
Heterogeneous effect: we will replicate Gornall and Strebulav (2019)’s heterogeneous effect. Specifically, heterogeneous effect along investors’ gender, education, fund size, age, location etc.

Experiment 2: Investor-side IRR experiment
Test:
First order effect: all the randomized characteristics of the startups will be tested. All the measurements from the four questions asked for each profile will be used as the outcome variable. Specifically, we want to test the effect of gender, race, age, education and comparative advantages (startup quality)
Interaction Effect: gender by race, gender by education, gender by quality, gender by age and other interaction effects
Heterogeneous effect: if the sample size is large enough, we will check heterogeneous effect along all the demographic dimension of the investors. Also, I will study the heterogeneous effect based on investors' decisions after developing a new econometric estimator by utilizing the extra within-individual level random variation.

Dictator Game: use the donated money as the main outcome variables to disentangle the taste-based discrimination.

Experiment 3: Startup-side IRR experiment
Test:
First order effect: all the randomized characteristics of the investors will be tested. All the measurements from the four questions asked for each profile will be used as the outcome variable. Specifically, we want to test the effect of gender, race, education and experience (investor quality)
Interaction Effect: gender by race, gender by education, gender by quality, and other interaction effects
Heterogeneous effect: if the sample size is large enough, we will check heterogeneous effect along all the demographic dimensions of the evaluators (i.e gender, race, industry, etc) and also the heterogeneous effect based on evaluators' decisions using the recently developed econometric estimator.


Detailed regressions are described in the attached files.
Randomization Method
Individual-level randomization is implemented on the computer by coding.
Randomization Unit
Individual-level randomization is implemented.
Was the treatment clustered?
No

Experiment Characteristics

Sample size: planned number of clusters
20,000-30,000
Sample size: planned number of observations
experiment 1: 20,000-30,000 experiment 2: 50-100 experiment 3: 900
Sample size (or number of clusters) by treatment arms
balanced, 50% treatment and 50% control
Minimum detectable effect size for main outcomes (accounting for sample design and clustering)
experiment 1: 20,000-30,000 experiment 2: 400 experiment 3: 900
IRB

Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)

IRB Name
Columbia Morningside Campus Institutional Review Board
IRB Approval Date
2020-01-17
IRB Approval Number
AAAS6419; AAAS8362; AAAS8730
Analysis Plan

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information

Post-Trial

Post Trial Information

Study Withdrawal

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information

Intervention

Is the intervention completed?
No
Data Collection Complete
Data Publication

Data Publication

Is public data available?
No

Program Files

Program Files
Reports, Papers & Other Materials

Relevant Paper(s)

Reports & Other Materials