Effectiveness of microcredit programs: A randomized controlled trial in China

Last registered on January 04, 2020

Pre-Trial

Trial Information

General Information

Title
Effectiveness of microcredit programs: A randomized controlled trial in China
RCT ID
AEARCTR-0005216
Initial registration date
December 27, 2019

Initial registration date is when the trial was registered.

It corresponds to when the registration was submitted to the Registry to be reviewed for publication.

First published
January 04, 2020, 11:31 PM EST

First published corresponds to when the trial was first made public on the Registry after being reviewed.

Locations

Region

Primary Investigator

Affiliation
Renmin University of China

Other Primary Investigator(s)

PI Affiliation
Aalto University
PI Affiliation
Renmin University of China

Additional Trial Information

Status
Completed
Start date
2010-08-01
End date
2014-12-31
Secondary IDs
Abstract
The aim of this study is to explain why microcredit programs work to different extents even when socioeconomic contexts are controlled for. We plan to estimate the causal impact of an official microcredit project – the village fund in rural China – on a number of economic well-being outcomes, and identify the reasons explaining the impact heterogeneity from perspectives of local political cycles.
External Link(s)

Registration Citation

Citation
Pan, Yao, Sangui Wang and Jing You. 2020. "Effectiveness of microcredit programs: A randomized controlled trial in China." AEA RCT Registry. January 04. https://doi.org/10.1257/rct.5216
Sponsors & Partners

There are documents in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access to this information.

Request Information
Experimental Details

Interventions

Intervention(s)
The research team selected 50 ultra poor villages among areas where the village fund program had not been implemented by 2010. The sample covers five out of the eleven ultra-poor cluster areas designated by the State Council. We randomly assigned treatment to 30 villages while held other 20 villages as the control group. Within each village, we used systematic sampling to randomly select 30 survey households.

The intervention was to establish the village fund in the treated villages under collaboration between the research team and the State Council Leading Group Office of Poverty Alleviation and Development. Specifically, after collection the baseline household and village surveys in August 2010, the State Council transferred each treated village 150,000 yuan to establish the village fund. The government issued formal documents to different levels of local governments about the general requirements/procedures of establishing and managing the fund, including accouchement and explanation of policy in treated villages, running selection of the fund committee, and training the fund committee members with financial knowledge and accounting skills under the help of the research team. In terms of actual practice, villages were encouraged to form their own implementation plan according to local conditions to fully realize the program’s potential. The State Council managed the administrative data of the village fund, including all transactions and defaults. The central and provincial government officials investigated into the administrative system every 1-3 months. The provincial government officials visited the treated villages for on-the-site checks of their account books frequently. Upon detecting suspicious lending, the government officials would further investigate into the village and fund committees and reported the issues to the central government. By comparison, the control group did not establish the village fund.
Intervention Start Date
2010-09-01
Intervention End Date
2014-12-31

Primary Outcomes

Primary Outcomes (end points)
(1) Economic well-being: borrowing behaviour, defaults, income, consumption, assets,

(2) Village fund implementation: Composition of the village fund committee, behaviour of the members in the village fund committee (e.g., attending training and setting up loan terms), participants’ satisfaction of the village fund.
Primary Outcomes (explanation)

Secondary Outcomes

Secondary Outcomes (end points)
We collect administrative data of the Village Fund from the State Council Leading Group Office of Poverty Alleviation and Development. It includes records of borrowing, defaults, violation of rules, targeting and financial sustainability.
Secondary Outcomes (explanation)

Experimental Design

Experimental Design
The research team has collaborated with the State Council Leading Group Office of Poverty Alleviation and Development to implement the RCT. It involves 1,500 households in 50 Chinese villages. The team has collected survey data via face-to-face interview at the household and village level, and obtained administrative data from the State Council Leading Group Office of Poverty Alleviation and Development. After collecting the baseline household and village surveys in August 2010, the State Council established the village fund – a formal microcredit program emphasizing support of agricultural production – in 30 treated villages, while kept other 20 villages as the controlled group. The State Council injected 150,000 yuan to each treated village for the initial fund for the microcredit program. The villagers decided whether to join the program on the voluntary basis. All participants to the project in the village selected the fund committee members who would manage the fund including attending necessary trainings held by upper-level governments, determining the loan terms and fines/penalties for defaults, and making lending decisions. The committee is in fully charge of the project management and financial sustainability as long as they follow the general guidelines set up by the State Council. The general guidelines include supporting the poor people and production activities, the maximum size, interest rate and loan term. The upper-level governments closely check administration from the project system covering all transactions and frequent visits to the treated village. The team re-interviewed the households and villages in July 2012 for the follow-up surveys and accessed the administrative data in the project system over the entire trial period 01/08/2010 and 31/12/2014.
Experimental Design Details
Randomization Method
The RCT uses the stratified randomisation. The research team selected 5 provinces covering coastal, central and inland China. The villages of each province were stratified by locations and income poverty rates. Within each village, all households were listed according to their wealth. 30 households were randomly selected within each village.
Randomization Unit
Village
Was the treatment clustered?
No

Experiment Characteristics

Sample size: planned number of clusters
50 villages
Sample size: planned number of observations
1500 households out of 50 villages in 5 provinces
Sample size (or number of clusters) by treatment arms
900 households out of 30 villages are in the treatment group. 600 households out of 20 villages are in the control group.
Minimum detectable effect size for main outcomes (accounting for sample design and clustering)
IRB

Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)

IRB Name
IRB Approval Date
IRB Approval Number

Post-Trial

Post Trial Information

Study Withdrawal

There are documents in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access to this information.

Request Information

Intervention

Is the intervention completed?
No
Data Collection Complete
Data Publication

Data Publication

Is public data available?
No

Program Files

Program Files
Reports, Papers & Other Materials

Relevant Paper(s)

Reports & Other Materials