Field | Before | After |
---|---|---|
Field Trial Status | Before on_going | After completed |
Field Last Published | Before January 10, 2020 11:25 AM | After August 04, 2020 03:28 AM |
Field Study Withdrawn | Before | After No |
Field Intervention Completion Date | Before | After January 01, 2020 |
Field Data Collection Complete | Before | After Yes |
Field Final Sample Size: Number of Clusters (Unit of Randomization) | Before | After 146 sub-counties |
Field Was attrition correlated with treatment status? | Before | After No |
Field Final Sample Size: Total Number of Observations | Before | After 7300 |
Field Final Sample Size (or Number of Clusters) by Treatment Arms | Before | After 2000 (40) control sub-counties, 900 (18) deliberation sub-counties, 1450 (29) information sub-counties, 1000 (20) information + deliberation sub-counties, 2000 (40) sub-counties in areas the received a district level baraza |
Field Public Data URL | Before | After https://github.com/bjvca/baraza/tree/master/data/public |
Field Is there a restricted access data set available on request? | Before | After No |
Field Program Files | Before | After Yes |
Field Program Files URL | Before | After https://github.com/bjvca/baraza/tree/master/report |
Field Data Collection Completion Date | Before | After March 01, 2020 |
Field Is data available for public use? | Before | After Yes |
Field | Before | After |
---|---|---|
Field Paper Abstract | Before | After To improve public service delivery, the Government of Uganda organizes community forums-popularly known as barazas-where citizens receive information from government officials, and get the opportunity to directly engage with them. We run a cluster randomized control trial to assess the impact of this policy intervention on public service delivery in agriculture, health, education, and infrastructure. Using a factorial design, we further test the relative importance of the two main components of the intervention-information provision and citizen engagement. we also compare the effectiveness of barazas organized at the district level to the effectiveness of barazas organized at the sub-county level. Using a strictly pre-registered confirmatory analysis, we find no impact of the intervention on general public service delivery, but there are some indications that sub-county level barazas increase outcomes in the agricultural sector. A more exploratory part that looks at individual outcomes, potential mechanisms, and heterogeneous treatment effects suggests localized impacts of barazas in the areas of agricultural extension services and agricultural input distribution, access to drinking water, and school enrolment and infrastructure. |
Field Paper Citation | Before | After Kabunga, Nassul Ssentamu; Miehe, Caroline; Mogues, Tewodaj; and Van Campenhout, Bjorn. 2020. Community based monitoring and public service delivery: Impact, and the role of information, deliberation, and jurisdictional tier. IFPRI Discussion Paper 1933. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). https://doi.org/10.2499/p15738coll2.133751 |
Field Paper URL | Before | After https://www.ifpri.org/publication/community-based-monitoring-and-public-service-delivery-impact-and-role-information |