Experimental Evidence on the Role of Students' Interests during Learning.
Last registered on March 24, 2020

Pre-Trial

Trial Information
General Information
Title
Experimental Evidence on the Role of Students' Interests during Learning.
RCT ID
AEARCTR-0005480
Initial registration date
March 24, 2020
Last updated
March 24, 2020 10:57 AM EDT
Location(s)
Region
Primary Investigator
Affiliation
KU Leuven
Other Primary Investigator(s)
PI Affiliation
UAntwerpen
PI Affiliation
KU Leuven
PI Affiliation
KU Leuven
Additional Trial Information
Status
On going
Start date
2018-12-07
End date
2020-05-31
Secondary IDs
Abstract
Despite the high returns to education, private investment among many students remains remarkably low. That the present long-term returns do not motivate students enough to invest effort during learning is one explanation for this puzzle. Given the increasing body of evidence implying non-cognitive skills to play an equally important role for education investments as cognitive skills, this study examines an incentive scheme through which students’ learning experience is expected to enhance, i.e., example choice, an instructional approach that offers students a choice between predefined contexts for an academic topic, which are related to their out-of-school interests. To establish our results, we conducted a field experiment in the seventh and eighth grade of Flemish secondary education involving 1,460 students in 31 schools. We hypothesise that modifying learning material to draw on students’ interests not only improves the interest in the topic, but also the academic performance of students.
External Link(s)
Registration Citation
Citation
De Witte, Kristof et al. 2020. "Experimental Evidence on the Role of Students' Interests during Learning. ." AEA RCT Registry. March 24. https://doi.org/10.1257/rct.5480-1.0.
Sponsors & Partners

There are documents in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access to this information.

Request Information
Experimental Details
Interventions
Intervention(s)
We designed two conditions to study the effect of modifying material to draw on students’ interests:
- A control condition where students followed a standard financial education programme.
- A treatment condition where students followed a financial education programme in which, for every exercise, they were given the choice between different contexts based on three interest fields, i.e., sports, music and culture, and social media and gaming. The three interest fields were chosen based on the responses of a short survey.
Intervention Start Date
2019-01-21
Intervention End Date
2019-06-03
Primary Outcomes
Primary Outcomes (end points)
We assess students' academic performance using computer-aided multiple-choice questions that refer directly to the learning material and measure financial literacy in a wider sense.
Primary Outcomes (explanation)
Secondary Outcomes
Secondary Outcomes (end points)
To evaluate whether students' interest in the topic is affected by the programme, we measure students' triggered situational interest, maintained situational interest, and perceived value using three scales.
Secondary Outcomes (explanation)
Experimental Design
Experimental Design
The programme was developed for students in the seventh and eighth grade of Flemish secondary education. Schools were recruited via an open call in December 2018. Participating schools were randomly assigned to the control or treatment condition. The financial education programme was designed as four lectures of 50 min. in the form of an interactive website. The website focused on the topic of the government and taxes. Students completed the material individually. No particular teacher training was provided. Teachers were requested to give the programme during regular class hours in pre-specified periods. To measure the impact of the programme, students had to take two tests, i.e., a test before the start of the lectures to capture students’ baseline knowledge, interest, and attitudes about the topic and a test at the start of the last lecture to measure the effectiveness of the different versions of the programme.
Experimental Design Details
Randomization Method
Schools were randomly assigned to a condition using a random number generator in Stata.
Randomization Unit
Randomisation was done at the level of the school.
Was the treatment clustered?
Yes
Experiment Characteristics
Sample size: planned number of clusters
31 schools participated in the programme of which 19 schools entirely followed the protocol (students completed both the pre- and post-treatment test).
Sample size: planned number of observations
1,460 students took the pre-treatment test of which 673 students also took the post-treatment test.
Sample size (or number of clusters) by treatment arms
Control condition: 731 students in 15 schools (361 students in 10 schools took the post-test)
Treatment condition: 729 students in 16 schools (312 students in 9 schools took the post-test)
Minimum detectable effect size for main outcomes (accounting for sample design and clustering)
IRB
INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARDS (IRBs)
IRB Name
IRB Approval Date
IRB Approval Number
Post-Trial
Post Trial Information
Study Withdrawal
Intervention
Is the intervention completed?
No
Is data collection complete?
Data Publication
Data Publication
Is public data available?
No
Program Files
Program Files
Reports and Papers
Preliminary Reports
Relevant Papers