Field | Before | After |
---|---|---|
Field Trial Status | Before in_development | After completed |
Field Trial End Date | Before April 24, 2020 | After May 24, 2020 |
Field Last Published | Before April 21, 2020 11:32 AM | After June 05, 2020 09:26 AM |
Field Study Withdrawn | Before | After No |
Field Intervention Completion Date | Before | After April 24, 2020 |
Field Data Collection Complete | Before | After Yes |
Field Was attrition correlated with treatment status? | Before | After No |
Field Final Sample Size: Total Number of Observations | Before | After 300 observations (i.e. subjects waiting in line after the experimenter) |
Field Final Sample Size (or Number of Clusters) by Treatment Arms | Before | After 150 observations (i.e. subjects waiting in line after the experimenter) in the treatment with mask and 150 observations in the treatment without mask |
Field Is there a restricted access data set available on request? | Before | After No |
Field Program Files | Before | After No |
Field Data Collection Completion Date | Before | After April 24, 2020 |
Field Is data available for public use? | Before | After No |
Field | Before | After |
---|---|---|
Field Preliminary Report Completion Date | Before | After May 23, 2020 |
Field Preliminary Report Abstract | Before | After Governments across the world have implemented restrictive policies to slow the spread of COVID-19. Mandatory face mask use has been a controversially discussed policy, among others, due to potential adverse effects on physical distancing. Using a randomized field experiment (N=300), we show that individuals keep a significantly larger distance from someone wearing a face mask than from an unmasked person. According to an additional survey experiment (N=456), masked individuals are not perceived as being more infectious than unmasked ones, but they are believed to prefer more distancing. This result suggests that, in times where mask use is voluntary, wearing a mask serves as a social signal for a preferred greater distance that is respected by others. Our findings provide strong evidence against a potential negative effect of masking on physical distancing, suggesting that mandatory masking would indeed be effective. However, as the social signal from masks may become diluted under a universal masking policy, the observed positive effect of masks on distancing may weaken under mandatory masking. |
Field Paper URL | Before | After https://osf.io/es7kt/ |