Egocentric Norm Adoption

Last registered on May 08, 2020

Pre-Trial

Trial Information

General Information

Title
Egocentric Norm Adoption
RCT ID
AEARCTR-0005774
Initial registration date
April 27, 2020

Initial registration date is when the trial was registered.

It corresponds to when the registration was submitted to the Registry to be reviewed for publication.

First published
April 28, 2020, 10:57 AM EDT

First published corresponds to when the trial was first made public on the Registry after being reviewed.

Last updated
May 08, 2020, 8:16 AM EDT

Last updated is the most recent time when changes to the trial's registration were published.

Locations

Primary Investigator

Affiliation
University of Bonn

Other Primary Investigator(s)

Additional Trial Information

Status
In development
Start date
2020-05-09
End date
2020-12-31
Secondary IDs
Abstract
Norms are important determinants of human behavior, and many decisions entail normative trade-offs. This project conjectures that people are inclined to base their actions more heavily on norms which are beneficial for themselves. In particular, this extends to situations where people are unaffected by their own actions but subject to the actions of others. A (virtual) laboratory experiment is conducted to establish the existence of the proposed effect.
External Link(s)

Registration Citation

Citation
Neuber, Thomas. 2020. "Egocentric Norm Adoption." AEA RCT Registry. May 08. https://doi.org/10.1257/rct.5774-2.0
Sponsors & Partners

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information
Experimental Details

Interventions

Intervention(s)
Intervention Start Date
2020-05-09
Intervention End Date
2020-12-31

Primary Outcomes

Primary Outcomes (end points)
The two choice options (integers between 1 and 20) selected by every subject for the members of the respective receiving group (one for each of the two procedures)
Primary Outcomes (explanation)

Secondary Outcomes

Secondary Outcomes (end points)
The two predictions (integers between 1 and 20) made by every subject regarding the choices made by participants in other groups that are facing the same decisions (one for each of the two procedures)
Secondary Outcomes (explanation)

Experimental Design

Experimental Design
Pairs of subjects are lined up in a circle, each being potentially affected by decisions of the respective preceding group and themselves making decisions for the following group.
Experimental Design Details
A multiple of four participants take part in the experiment. They are randomly allocated to groups of two, which are numbered consecutively from one to N. In each group, one participant is called X and the other Y. All participants receive a fixed participation fee and—during the experiment—points that are worth money. Importantly, no player makes any decision regarding their own group. Instead, groups decide for players in other groups along a circle, i.e., Group 1 decides for Group 2, Group 2 decides for Group 3, ..., and Group N decides for Group 1. Players are being told so before learning any of the details of the experiment. Each player makes two decisions, each between 20 different options. One decision is about the trade-off between equality and efficiency, the other is about the trade-off between equality and equity, i.e., attribution of responsibility. For the Efficiency Procedure, players are allocated to roles A and B, where A profits from efficiency and B from equality. For the Equity Procedure, roles are denoted by a and b, where role a profits from equity and role b from equality. The names of roles are only used for the formal exposition and do not appear in the instructions. The same is also true for the two procedures. Their order is randomized on the player-level, and they are simply referred to by their order of appearance. Any two players in any two adjoining groups share exactly one role.
This structure ensures that no player is ever confronted with another player belonging to a "double out-group" in terms of their roles and thereby alleviates concerns about in-group–out-group bias. Players first learn about types in their own groups and potential payoff consequences for themselves before being informed about the details of the succeeding group, for which they decide. At the end of the experiment, one of the two procedures is selected at random and the respective decision of one player from either all odd- or all even-numbered groups is implemented. These players themselves receive 1000 points, i.e., the maximum that can be attained in the experiment.
Randomization Method
Randomization done by a computer, i.e., by the oTree server.
Randomization Unit
Randomization into tuples of roles on the level of the individual participant.
Was the treatment clustered?
No

Experiment Characteristics

Sample size: planned number of clusters
Not applicable.
Sample size: planned number of observations
Around 350. Precise number depends the logistics of the experiment.
Sample size (or number of clusters) by treatment arms
For each of the two procedures, the numbers of subjects taking each of the two roles are balanced by design.
Minimum detectable effect size for main outcomes (accounting for sample design and clustering)
Drawing on experience from a pretest and requiring a significance level of five percent, a statistical power of 0.8 could be achieved for the hypothesis test specified in the attached analysis plan if the true underlying average effect in terms of choice options was at least 2.2, corresponding to a 0.43 standard deviation increase relative to the comparison group.
IRB

Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)

IRB Name
IRB Approval Date
IRB Approval Number
Analysis Plan

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information

Post-Trial

Post Trial Information

Study Withdrawal

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information

Intervention

Is the intervention completed?
No
Data Collection Complete
Data Publication

Data Publication

Is public data available?
No

Program Files

Program Files
Reports, Papers & Other Materials

Relevant Paper(s)

Reports & Other Materials