Please fill out this short user survey of only 3 questions in order to help us improve the site. We appreciate your feedback!
Rational Discouragement? Returns to Search for Marginal Labor Force Participants
Last registered on July 29, 2020


Trial Information
General Information
Rational Discouragement? Returns to Search for Marginal Labor Force Participants
Initial registration date
July 28, 2020
Last updated
July 29, 2020 10:11 AM EDT

This section is unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access to this information.

Request Information
Primary Investigator
Bates College
Other Primary Investigator(s)
PI Affiliation
Duke University
PI Affiliation
Duke University
PI Affiliation
Duke University
Additional Trial Information
On going
Start date
End date
Secondary IDs
Many individuals state that they want to work but are neither working nor actively searching for work. This may reflect “rational discouragement,” in which they correctly anticipate that their private returns to search are low. If so, encouraging these individuals to increase search effort may have private costs and potentially even negative externalities due to congestion costs. Alternatively, some individuals may fail to search despite high private returns. We conduct a field experiment in Pakistan that randomly varies the process of applying for jobs. We use this to describe the marginal individuals induced to search by an easier process and identify their private returns to search.

We are registering this trial during the COVID-19 epidemic. Our intervention end date, trial end date, and final sample size will depend on the progress of the epidemic.
External Link(s)
Registration Citation
Field, Erica et al. 2020. "Rational Discouragement? Returns to Search for Marginal Labor Force Participants." AEA RCT Registry. July 29. https://doi.org/10.1257/rct.5997-1.0.
Experimental Details
Intervention Start Date
Intervention End Date
Primary Outcomes
Primary Outcomes (end points)
job search, employment, employment characteristics
Primary Outcomes (explanation)
Secondary Outcomes
Secondary Outcomes (end points)
We also measure potential mechanisms such as beliefs and search costs.
Secondary Outcomes (explanation)
Experimental Design
Experimental Design
Individual participants on Job Talash, a job search facilitation service, are randomly assigned to one of two different processes for applying for jobs. Both groups are matched regularly to posted vacancies based on their qualifications and preferences. The control group receives a text message with a short list of the matched vacancies and an invitation to call the service to submit job applications. The treatment group receives a phone call with a list of the vacancies and can submit applications during that call. We compare outcomes across individuals assigned to the different treatments to identify effects on job search and downstream employment outcomes. We use additional randomized treatments for subsamples and subperiods to evaluate mechanisms that might explain job search and employment effects.
Experimental Design Details
Not available
Randomization Method
Randomization was conducted using Stata.
Randomization Unit
Treatment is assigned at the participant level. Analysis using panel data on participants (e.g. participant*vacancy application decisions) will account for within-participant clustering.
Was the treatment clustered?
Experiment Characteristics
Sample size: planned number of clusters
Sample size: planned number of observations
Individuals: 10,373 - sample size at the time of registering the PAP with enrollment ongoing, final sample size will depend on COVID-19.
Sample size (or number of clusters) by treatment arms
5,170 individuals in treatment; 5,203 in control at the time of registering the study.
Minimum detectable effect size for main outcomes (accounting for sample design and clustering)
IRB Name
Duke University
IRB Approval Date
IRB Approval Number
C0441 / 2019-0067