x

We are happy to announce that all trial registrations will now be issued DOIs (digital object identifiers). For more information, see here.
Understanding the role of peer pressure in shaping students educational investments
Last registered on February 12, 2014
View Trial History

Pre-Trial

Trial Information
General Information
Title
Understanding the role of peer pressure in shaping students educational investments
RCT ID
AEARCTR-0000060
Initial registration date
February 12, 2014
Last updated
February 12, 2014 5:16 PM EST
Location(s)
Country
United States of America
Region
Primary Investigator
Name
Robert Jensen
Affiliation
University of Pennsylvania
Contact Primary Investigator
Other Primary Investigator(s)
PI Name
Leonardo Bursztyn
PI Affiliation
UCLA
Contact Investigator
Additional Trial Information
Status
In development
Start date
2012-10-01
End date
2014-09-30
Keywords
Education
Additional Keywords
JEL code(s)
Secondary IDs
Abstract
This paper uses a field experiment conducted in high schools from the Los Angeles Unified School District to understand the nature of social costs students face when they make decisions on educational investments.
External Link(s)
Registration Citation
Citation
Bursztyn, Leonardo and Robert Jensen. 2014. "Understanding the role of peer pressure in shaping students educational investments." AEA RCT Registry. February 12. https://doi.org/10.1257/rct.60-1.0.
Former Citation
Bursztyn, Leonardo and Robert Jensen. 2014. "Understanding the role of peer pressure in shaping students educational investments." AEA RCT Registry. February 12. https://www.socialscienceregistry.org/trials/60/history/1072.
Sponsors & Partners

There are documents in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access to this information.

Request Information
Experimental Details
Interventions
Intervention(s)
Intervention Start Date
2014-01-15
Intervention End Date
2014-03-01
Primary Outcomes
Primary Outcomes (end points)
Take up rates of the offer of free SAT prep courses.
Primary Outcomes (explanation)
Secondary Outcomes
Secondary Outcomes (end points)
Secondary Outcomes (explanation)
Experimental Design
Experimental Design
We will provide students with forms that ask them whether they would like to sign up for a free, online SAT prep course.
Experimental Design Details
We will provide students with forms that ask them whether they would like to sign up for a free, online SAT prep course. We will randomly vary (among students within classrooms) whether the form states that the information will be kept completely private from everyone, including their classmates. The forms will be identical other than this final disclaimer. The more explicit, greater assurance of privacy from classmates regarding the decision to enroll in the test prep course is proposed to reduce the level of social stigma involved in enrollment and thus increase take up (note however, in none of the cases will we make sign up decisions public--we simply vary the extent to which privacy from classmates is emphasized). We will also stratify by honors vs. non-honors classes. Our model suggests that different norms may take hold in the two kinds of classes, with stigma greater in non-honors classes, thus a greater effect of information being kept private. We will also collect data on self-reported attributes such as grades and time preferences, where we expect students who do better to face less of a stigma, students who discount the future more to be more concerned with stigma, as will students who care more about popularity.
Randomization Method
The differing sign up forms will be shuffled and distributed to students in the order they sit in the room.
Randomization Unit
Students, within classrooms (and stratified for honors vs. non-honors classes)
Was the treatment clustered?
Yes
Experiment Characteristics
Sample size: planned number of clusters
4 schools, approximately 20 classrooms
Sample size: planned number of observations
1,000 (approximate, since classroom sizes will vary)
Sample size (or number of clusters) by treatment arms
Approximately 500 treatment, 500 control (approximate since classroom sizes will vary)
Minimum detectable effect size for main outcomes (accounting for sample design and clustering)
Supporting Documents and Materials
IRB
INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARDS (IRBs)
IRB Name
UCLA Office of the Human Research Protection Program
IRB Approval Date
2013-09-30
IRB Approval Number
13-001347
Analysis Plan
Post-Trial
Post Trial Information
Study Withdrawal
Intervention
Is the intervention completed?
No
Is data collection complete?
Data Publication
Data Publication
Is public data available?
No
Program Files
Program Files
Reports and Papers
Preliminary Reports
Relevant Papers