| Field | Before | After |
|---|---|---|
| Field Public Data URL | Before | After https://osf.io/pfq4k/ |
| Field Is there a restricted access data set available on request? | Before | After No |
| Field Program Files | Before | After Yes |
| Field Program Files URL | Before | After https://osf.io/pfq4k/ |
| Field Is data available for public use? | Before | After Yes |
| Field | Before | After |
|---|---|---|
| Field Paper Abstract | Before | After Evidence has shown that blame for a “bad” decision can be shifted by delegating the decision to someone else. We conduct experiments using a four-player delegated dictator game to examine whether the reverse is also true: does one receive credit for taking a “good” decision as compared to delegating the decision to someone else? Our results indicate that the answer is affirmative. A person receives higher rewards when she makes a fair decision herself than when a delegate does. This indicates that responsibility attribution is a double-edged sword that applies to both bad and good outcomes. |
| Field Paper Citation | Before | After Argenton, C., Potters, J., & Yang, Y. (2023). Receiving credit: On delegation and responsibility. European Economic Review, 158, 104522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2023.104522 |
| Field Paper URL | Before | After https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2023.104522 |