Please fill out this short user survey of only 3 questions in order to help us improve the site. We appreciate your feedback!
Incentives for firm transparency in large-scale surveys
Last registered on July 08, 2020


Trial Information
General Information
Incentives for firm transparency in large-scale surveys
Initial registration date
July 04, 2020
Last updated
July 08, 2020 5:13 PM EDT
Primary Investigator
University of Mannheim
Other Primary Investigator(s)
Additional Trial Information
In development
Start date
End date
Secondary IDs
In this study we designed five incentive treatments to evaluate their effectiveness for firms to provide information in an large-scale survey. A novel method is that we invite a part of the firms to advertise their business on our website as an incentive. In another treatment, we use the authority of an important institution that explicitly calls for participation. The third treatment provides firms industry reports as an incentive to participate. All these treatments are based on the baseline treatment, where we only invite firms to participate in a short message without any additional incentive. In the final treatment we extend this short message with information about the research program but no additional incentives. This is related to the letter treatments in Dwenger et al. (2016), De Neve et al. (2019), and Chetty et al. (2014).
External Link(s)
Registration Citation
Rostam-Afschar, Davud. 2020. "Incentives for firm transparency in large-scale surveys." AEA RCT Registry. July 08. https://doi.org/10.1257/rct.6122-1.0.
Experimental Details
See experimental design and attached documents
Intervention Start Date
Intervention End Date
Primary Outcomes
Primary Outcomes (end points)
i) response rate
ii) completion rate
iii) agreement to be available for follow-up studies
Primary Outcomes (explanation)
We construct response rates, completion rates, and the aggregate number of availablity for follow-ups for each of the treatment arms.
Secondary Outcomes
Secondary Outcomes (end points)
Secondary Outcomes (explanation)
Experimental Design
Experimental Design
In a large-scale survey of firms, we vary the way, we approach the firms. We send out five different versions of invitation letters.

i) Letter with link to support letter of prominent institution
ii) Letter, where we highlight that we will provide firms with industry reports
iii) Letter, where we allow firms to advertise on our webpage
iv) Long letter
v) Short letter
Experimental Design Details
Randomization Method
We generate a randomized sequences of integers using atmospheric noise on a computer. The realization indicates the day of the week (1-5) starting with Monday, which is assiged to the five treatments. In the following weeks, the sequence is alternated by decrementing, i.e. if day 3 had been assigned in week 1, in week 2 day 2 is assigned. Decrements to day 0 are appended as day 5.
Randomization Unit
Was the treatment clustered?
Experiment Characteristics
Sample size: planned number of clusters
The Treatments are not clustered. See below for the number of observed firms.
Sample size: planned number of observations
We approach approximately 600,000 firms and invite them to participate in our survey. We expect a response rate between 0.5 an 5%. For example, a response rate of 1% would imply that we have 6,000 independent firm-level observations.
Sample size (or number of clusters) by treatment arms
Even distribution of observations across the five treatment arms.
Minimum detectable effect size for main outcomes (accounting for sample design and clustering)
Supporting Documents and Materials

There are documents in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access to this information.

Request Information
IRB Name
IRB Approval Date
IRB Approval Number
Post Trial Information
Study Withdrawal
Is the intervention completed?
Is data collection complete?
Data Publication
Data Publication
Is public data available?
Program Files
Program Files
Reports, Papers & Other Materials
Relevant Paper(s)