Thriving Together: Creating Social Support Groups for the Reintegration and Empowerment of Formerly Abducted Women in Northern Uganda

Last registered on March 04, 2021


Trial Information

General Information

Thriving Together: Creating Social Support Groups for the Reintegration and Empowerment of Formerly Abducted Women in Northern Uganda
Initial registration date
March 03, 2021
Last updated
March 04, 2021, 6:36 AM EST


There are documents in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access to this information.

Request Information

Primary Investigator

University of San Francisco

Other Primary Investigator(s)

PI Affiliation
Makerere University, Kampala Uganda
PI Affiliation
Texas A&M, US

Additional Trial Information

In development
Start date
End date
Secondary IDs
The proposed study employs survey and experimental methods to: 1) assess the current social, economic and psychological status of formerly abducted women in Northern Uganda as compared to never abducted comparable women; and 2) scientifically test the effectiveness of women’s support groups in facilitating the reintegration of formerly abducted women, raising their aspirations, creating economic opportunities and increasing their overall well-being.
External Link(s)

Registration Citation

Cassar, Alessandra, Christine Mbabazi and Danila Serra. 2021. "Thriving Together: Creating Social Support Groups for the Reintegration and Empowerment of Formerly Abducted Women in Northern Uganda ." AEA RCT Registry. March 04.
Sponsors & Partners


Experimental Details


A total of about 200 women, of which 80-100 previously abducted and 100-120 never abducted, will take part of the study. We aim to scale up the study and involve more women in the future, conditional on the success of this initial investigation. In collaboration with local partners, our program will unfold in three phases. Phase 1 will consist of 10 half-day workshops in which the study participants, in groups of 16-20 women, will engage in a set of incentivized behavioral games and an extensive survey. The workshop will generate important baseline data that will be compared to endline data, which we will collect in 2021, six months after the completion of Phase1, during Phase 3 of the project. Phase 2 will consist of 12 by-monthly meetings, taking place between (tentatively) September and April, in which half of the study participants (30 formerly abductees and 45 never abducted women) will be invited to set, discuss and advise peers on achievable goals aimed at bettering their mutual conditions. These meetings will happen in groups of 5 women, under the guidance of a meeting facilitator. Phase 3 will follow the same methodology as Phase 1, i.e., it will consist of 9 workshops in which all the 150 women will participate in incentivized behavioral games and a survey.
Intervention Start Date
Intervention End Date

Primary Outcomes

Primary Outcomes (end points)
Behavioral outcomes: grit, risk, prosociality, competitiveness, cognitive skills
Intervention outcomes: goals achieved, social capital, wellbeing, economic outcomes, hopes and aspitation (education, income, life)
Psychological wellbeing: depression
Social support: instrumental, informational, and emotional social capital
Primary Outcomes (explanation)
Grit = from an experiment in which women are solving puzzles of different level of difficulty and asked (before final stage) whether they want to practice more.
Risk= from experimental game with unitary lottery protocol
Prosociality= from a series of dictator games towards 4 categories of recipients: woman formerly abducted, woman never abducted, random woman from same village, random man from same village
Competitiveness= from experimental game in which subjects are offered the option to be paid piece-rate (low amount) or to enter competitive tournament (higher amount) in a ball-tossing game
Cognitive skills= from standard Raven's tests
Intervention outcomes: goals achieved, social capital, wellbeing, economic outcomes, hopes and aspirations (education, income, life)
Psychological wellbeing: Edinburgh Scale

Secondary Outcomes

Secondary Outcomes (end points)
Stress reactions
Secondary Outcomes (explanation)
Stress reactions: from 16 questions in the survey to be compiled in: fight, flight, tend, befriend categories.

Experimental Design

Experimental Design
Phase 1. At baseline and endline (not covered by this proposal) we will conduct a survey and a series of incentivized lab in the field experiments during 10 half-day workshops, involving groups of 20 women each. The survey will serve to record women’s socio-economic background, demographics and, importantly, measures of experienced trauma and psychological well-being, such as stress, anxiety and depression (using internationally validates instruments), and several measures of social support from different characters in a woman’s network. The lab in the field experiments will serve to measure women’s attitudes, preferences and behaviors that we hypothesize are impacted by traumatic experiences and may be an obstacle/resource to individual life improvements. We will implement incentivized games to measure: 1) Cognitive Ability; 2) Grit; 3) Competitiveness; 4) Social shyness; 5) Preferences for giving to in-group versus out-group members; 6) Risk preferences. Furthermore, we will collect drawings from the women’s children to test for a potential intergenerational transmission of trauma. The initial workshops will provide us with baseline data for the second phase of the project.
Phase 2. We will then proceed with piloting a program ---we are not seeking PEP support at this time--- that utilizes peer-support and goal-setting to potentially impact in a positive manner the participants’ psychological well-being, social support, and, ultimately, their economic conditions. The program relies on bimonthly meetings for small groups of 6 women for the duration of 6 months organized around the setting of short-term goals aimed at bettering the women’s personal situations. This approach tests the principle that individuals could break cycles of poverty through light behavioral nudges and by harnessing the formation and/or the strengthening of local social capital.
Experimental Design Details
Not available
Randomization Method
At the end of all initial workshops, a lottery will be help by randomization via computer by field manager to randomly assign which participants will continue to the group meetings stage of the experiment.
Randomization Unit
Was the treatment clustered?

Experiment Characteristics

Sample size: planned number of clusters
Sample size: planned number of observations
This is a behavioral study planned for a total of roughly 200 women.
Sample size (or number of clusters) by treatment arms
Minimum detectable effect size for main outcomes (accounting for sample design and clustering)
Power calculation. Due to natural constraints and logistical necessities (i.e., the limiting factor availability of formerly abducted women) we will be able to enroll in the project 100 FA women (treatment group) and 100 NFA women (control group). Based on parameters from our previous studies on individual choice competitiveness and prosociality experiments among victimized and not victimized subjects in Bosnia and Sierra Leone, the minimum detectable effect size to reach the significance level of 5%, power of 80% (with a control mean of about 0.35, std1=0.48, std2=0.50) will be about 0.195.

Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)

IRB Name
Chief Administrative Officer - Kitgum District
IRB Approval Date
IRB Approval Number