Mortgage and Debt Illusion

Last registered on June 19, 2022

Pre-Trial

Trial Information

General Information

Title
Mortgage and Debt Illusion
RCT ID
AEARCTR-0006376
Initial registration date
September 22, 2020

Initial registration date is when the trial was registered.

It corresponds to when the registration was submitted to the Registry to be reviewed for publication.

First published
September 22, 2020, 7:44 AM EDT

First published corresponds to when the trial was first made public on the Registry after being reviewed.

Last updated
June 19, 2022, 5:54 AM EDT

Last updated is the most recent time when changes to the trial's registration were published.

Locations

Region

Primary Investigator

Affiliation
University of Sydney

Other Primary Investigator(s)

PI Affiliation
The Australian National University
PI Affiliation
University of Technology Sydney
PI Affiliation
University of New South Wales
PI Affiliation
College of William and Mary
PI Affiliation

Additional Trial Information

Status
In development
Start date
2020-10-01
End date
2023-06-30
Secondary IDs
Prior work
This trial does not extend or rely on any prior RCTs.
Abstract
Recent research shows that the presentation format of information affects consumer perception of the information. This study examines this phenomenon in the context of home loan choices by testing whether people’s perception of mortgage loan sizes is format-dependent.
External Link(s)

Registration Citation

Citation
Agnew, Julie et al. 2022. "Mortgage and Debt Illusion." AEA RCT Registry. June 19. https://doi.org/10.1257/rct.6376-4.0
Experimental Details

Interventions

Intervention(s)
Two interventions are introduced in the experiment. More details will be available after the experiment is completed.
Intervention (Hidden)
We randomly assign subjects to one of the two intervention groups. Both groups are used to test whether people’s perception of a mortgage loan differs when it is presented as monthly payments compared to a lump sum.

For intervention group 1: we present the mortgage loan size in two forms—lump sum and monthly repayments—and elicit the subject’s level of comfort with different loan sizes in each format of presentation. The purpose of the first intervention is to test whether the format of presentation (lump sum vs. monthly repayment) influences individual’s sensitivity to changes in the mortgage loan size.

For intervention group 2: we elicit the subject’s perceived equivalence between loans presented as monthly repayments and loans presented as lump sums. The purpose of the second intervention is to test how people’s willingness to take a mortgage might change when it is presented as a lump sum compared to monthly repayments.
Intervention Start Date
2020-10-01
Intervention End Date
2023-06-30

Primary Outcomes

Primary Outcomes (end points)
More information about the outcomes will be available after the experiment is completed.
Primary Outcomes (explanation)

Secondary Outcomes

Secondary Outcomes (end points)
Secondary Outcomes (explanation)

Experimental Design

Experimental Design
We conduct an online survey experiment with a sample of representative Australian households. More details will be available after the experiment is completed.
Experimental Design Details
We conduct an online survey experiment with a sample of representative Australian households (aged between 25 years and 65 years and earn over AUD $52,000/year) who now have mortgages, have taken mortgages in the past, or plan to take mortgages in the near future. We aim for a 50:50 gender split with “prefer not to say” randomly assigned between males and females for quota purposes.

Subjects are randomly assigned to two treatment groups. For treatment 1, the primary outcome is the subject’s comfort level with a given loan size. For treatment 2, the primary outcome is the equivalence mapping between lump sums and monthly repayments of a given loan size.

In the first treatment group, we ask the subjects to consider taking a new residential mortgage loan of different sizes. The subjects are told to assume that the mortgage in question is the only residential mortgage they have, it must be fully repaid after 25 years, and that a 20% deposit has already been paid. The subjects are asked to indicate how comfortable they would be with the different loan sizes on the seven-point Likert scale. Two rounds of questions are asked. The mortgage loan is presented as a lump sum in one round and presented as a monthly repayment in another round (the order of the two rounds is randomised). For each round, the question is repeated over ten different loan sizes (Lump sums: $200,000; $300,000; $400,000; $500,000; $600,000; $800,000; $1,000,000; $1,500,000; $2,000,000; $3,000,000. Monthly repayments: $940; $1410; $1880; $2350; $2820; $3760; $4700; $7040; $9390; $14,090). The order of the loan sizes is randomised between monotonically increasing and monotonically decreasing.

In the second treatment group, we ask the subjects to consider taking a new residential mortgage loan of different sizes. The subjects are told to assume that the mortgage in question is the only residential mortgage they have, it must be fully repaid after 25 years, and that a 20% deposit has already been paid. Two rounds of questions are asked. In one round, the subjects are shown a mortgage loan as a lump sum and asked to use a slider to select the monthly repayment level of a 25-year loan that makes them feel equally comfortable/uncomfortable given current market rates. The question is repeated over five different loan sizes. In another round, the subjects are shown a mortgage loan as monthly payments and asked to use a slider to select the amount of a 25-year loan as a lump sum that makes them feel equally comfortable/uncomfortable given current market rates. The question is repeated over five different loan sizes. The order of the two rounds is randomised. We also randomly assign each subject one of the two sets of loan sizes as below, and within each set, the order of loan sizes is randomised between monotonically increasing and monotonically decreasing.

1. Lump sums ($200,000; $400,000; $600,000; $1,000,000; $2,000,000) and monthly repayments ($1410; $2350; $3760; $7040; $14,090)
2. Lump sums ($300,000; $500,000; $800,000; $1,500,000; $3,000,000) and monthly repayments ($940; $1880; $2820; $4700; $9390)
Randomization Method
Randomisation by computer by the survey panel company.
Randomization Unit
The unit of randomisation is individual. More details will be available in the experimental design after the experiment is completed.
Was the treatment clustered?
No

Experiment Characteristics

Sample size: planned number of clusters
1,000 individuals
Sample size: planned number of observations
1,000 individuals
Sample size (or number of clusters) by treatment arms
Treatment Group 1: 500 individuals
Treatment Group 2: 500 individuals
Minimum detectable effect size for main outcomes (accounting for sample design and clustering)
IRB

Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)

IRB Name
The University of Sydney Human Research Ethics Committee
IRB Approval Date
2020-08-12
IRB Approval Number
2018/923

Post-Trial

Post Trial Information

Study Withdrawal

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information

Intervention

Is the intervention completed?
No
Data Collection Complete
Data Publication

Data Publication

Is public data available?
No

Program Files

Program Files
Reports, Papers & Other Materials

Relevant Paper(s)

Reports & Other Materials