x

The AEA RCT Registry will be down for maintenance on Tuesday, April 20th, from 9pm EDT to 11pm EDT to perform necessary upgrades. The site will be in maintenance mode during that time. We apologize for any inconvenience this may cause.
Inequality Aversion for Task Inequality and Payment Inequality
Last registered on December 28, 2020

Pre-Trial

Trial Information
General Information
Title
Inequality Aversion for Task Inequality and Payment Inequality
RCT ID
AEARCTR-0006471
Initial registration date
September 20, 2020
Last updated
December 28, 2020 4:21 PM EST
Location(s)
Region
Primary Investigator
Affiliation
Bryant University
Other Primary Investigator(s)
PI Affiliation
Additional Trial Information
Status
On going
Start date
2020-08-25
End date
2021-03-31
Secondary IDs
Abstract
Research on inequality aversion has been largely focused on the unequal distribution of monetary payment. However, inequality in naturally occurring environments can take many different forms. One important example of this is the unequal working load. In organizations, employees may receive the same salary but unequal working load. This project compares the attitudes towards inequality in these two domains. We will also address whether men and women may view these two types of inequality differently.

External Link(s)
Registration Citation
Citation
Pan, Xiaofei and Erte Xiao. 2020. "Inequality Aversion for Task Inequality and Payment Inequality." AEA RCT Registry. December 28. https://doi.org/10.1257/rct.6471-1.2000000000000002.
Experimental Details
Interventions
Intervention(s)
Intervention Start Date
2020-10-05
Intervention End Date
2021-03-31
Primary Outcomes
Primary Outcomes (end points)
1. rejection rate of unequal job allocation offers
Primary Outcomes (explanation)
Secondary Outcomes
Secondary Outcomes (end points)
Secondary Outcomes (explanation)
Experimental Design
Experimental Design
Our design is a variation of the ultimatum game where one worker propose how to allocate the tasks (or payment), the other decides whether to accept it. When accepted, both will work on the task (or receive the payment) as proposed.
Experimental Design Details
Randomization Method
computerized randomization.
Randomization Unit
experimental sessions
Was the treatment clustered?
No
Experiment Characteristics
Sample size: planned number of clusters
400-500 pairs
Sample size: planned number of observations
around 800-1000
Sample size (or number of clusters) by treatment arms
100 control-payment inequality
100 inequality payment
100 control-taskinequality
100 task inequality
100 unknown other unequal task
100 unknown other unequal payment
Minimum detectable effect size for main outcomes (accounting for sample design and clustering)
IRB
INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARDS (IRBs)
IRB Name
IRB Approval Date
IRB Approval Number
Post-Trial
Post Trial Information
Study Withdrawal
Intervention
Is the intervention completed?
No
Is data collection complete?
Data Publication
Data Publication
Is public data available?
No
Program Files
Program Files
Reports, Papers & Other Materials
Relevant Paper(s)
REPORTS & OTHER MATERIALS