Training Effective Altruism: Experimental Evidence from Pakistan

Last registered on March 13, 2023

Pre-Trial

Trial Information

General Information

Title
Training Effective Altruism: Experimental Evidence from Pakistan
RCT ID
AEARCTR-0006655
Initial registration date
October 22, 2020

Initial registration date is when the trial was registered.

It corresponds to when the registration was submitted to the Registry to be reviewed for publication.

First published
October 26, 2020, 2:13 PM EDT

First published corresponds to when the trial was first made public on the Registry after being reviewed.

Last updated
March 13, 2023, 9:52 AM EDT

Last updated is the most recent time when changes to the trial's registration were published.

Locations

Region

Primary Investigator

Affiliation
Toulouse School of Economics

Other Primary Investigator(s)

PI Affiliation
Lahore School of Economics
PI Affiliation
New Economic School

Additional Trial Information

Status
Completed
Start date
2020-10-31
End date
2021-10-14
Secondary IDs
Prior work
This trial does not extend or rely on any prior RCTs.
Abstract
Empathy is said to be the antidote to in-group bias. In this study we evaluate the causal effects of empathy training on elite civil servants in collaboration with the civil service administration and assess its impact on social preferences, bureaucratic performance, and thought leadership. Recent research suggests that emphasizing malleability of empathy as being key to behavioral change. In a factorial design, we also assess the impacts of emotional intelligence training, the impact of reading material whose content application is assessed via social emotional learning exercises. We also randomize econometrics book (mastering metrics) across the civil servants subject to their selection of the metrics book, where book on empathy serves as the other serves as a condition.

Update 13 March 2023. We are now also looking to evaluate the impact of empathy training (Utilitarian vs Malleavility vs Joint vs Control) using data from performance audits of civil servants. There are 12 government departments on which they can choose to recommend a budgetary allocation. We will evaluate the impact of our training on these 12 policy decisions in year 1 and year 2 post-treatment.
External Link(s)

Registration Citation

Citation
Chen, Daniel, Sultan Mehmood and Shaheen Naseer. 2023. "Training Effective Altruism: Experimental Evidence from Pakistan." AEA RCT Registry. March 13. https://doi.org/10.1257/rct.6655-2.4
Sponsors & Partners

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information
Experimental Details

Interventions

Intervention(s)
In this study, we aim to test whether training in empathy affects civil service quality, measured in terms of social preferences in experimental games, performance on the job, and thought leadership footprint.
Intervention Start Date
2020-10-31
Intervention End Date
2021-08-20

Primary Outcomes

Primary Outcomes (end points)
Update March 13, 2023: We are collecting data on the universe of spending decisions by the civil servants as they have now spent about 2 years in the field post-intervention. We will collect this data for year 1 and year 2 post empathy training intervention. This data will become available through performance audits of deputy ministers which contain information on their spending on various government departments. There are 12 government departments on which they can choose to recommend a budgetary allocation. These 12 policy outcomes are:
1) health,
2) education,
3) personal security,
4) office budget,
5) IT,
6) development,
7) horticulture,
8) sports,
9) entertainment,
10) law and order,
11) climate encroachment,
12) disaster.
Primary Outcomes (explanation)
Main Hypotheses. —We outline two main categories of policies that are most likely to be impacted by altruism training. For instance, we expect social policies, i.e. spending on health and education departments, to be positively impacted and selfish (self-oriented) policies, i.e. personal security and office budget, to be negatively affected (as they potentially crowd-out government funds) or unaffected (if government budget is not binding and there is no crowd-out). In the case of crowd-out, these selfish policies would be negatively impacted by increased value of altruism. Our main hypothesis, therefore, is that spending on social policies will increase and spending on selfish policies will decrease, while the other 8 policies will be unaffected.

Secondary Outcomes

Secondary Outcomes (end points)
Secondary Outcomes (explanation)

Experimental Design

Experimental Design
Lectures are delivered over zoom and randomized at the individual level. Empathy malleable vs. empathy utilitarian vs. both vs. control in online lectures. Class-wide lectures will also be randomized, focusing on emotional intelligence vs. macro-economics lectures.

Update March 13, 2023: We now also are collecting data on universe of spending decisions by the civil servants. Specificially, the study experimentally evaluates three methods of cultivating prosocial behaviour (i) Utilitarian Value of Empathy (ii) Malleability of Empathy (iii) Joint Utilitarian and Malleability Treatment (iv) Placebo treatment.

We outline two main categories of policies that are most likely to be impacted by altruism training. For instance, we expect social policies, i.e. spending on health and education departments, to be positively impacted and self-oriented policies, i.e. personal security and office budget, to be negatively affected (as they potentially crowd-out government funds). Our main hypothesis, therefore, is that spending on social policies will increase and spending on selfish policies will decrease, while the other 8 policies will be unaffected. For more details, see the pre-analysis plan.
Experimental Design Details
Randomization Method
Randomization done by computer
Randomization Unit
Individual
Was the treatment clustered?
Yes

Experiment Characteristics

Sample size: planned number of clusters
200 civil servants
Sample size: planned number of observations
200 civil servants
Sample size (or number of clusters) by treatment arms
50 in treatment arms
Minimum detectable effect size for main outcomes (accounting for sample design and clustering)
A single sided power test using as the outcome variable of interest from the pilot of empathy in a list experiment with a mean of 2.319 using one treatment group with 100 observations against a control group with 100 observations at a power .90 and a standard deviation of .920 shows that a minimum detectable effect would be a change of .230 of the standard deviation. The new minimum detectable mean would need to reach 2.53 to be detected.
IRB

Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)

IRB Name
Lahore School of Economics
IRB Approval Date
2020-11-11
IRB Approval Number
expected/pending due to covid delay; IRB was approved for February MDE calculation
Analysis Plan

Analysis Plan Documents

PAP Pre-Analysis Plan Policy Altruism.pdf

MD5: efb31c63032430711568462a08707231

SHA1: a918d85bba4d6a57ed9aaa373189afdf01cb5283

Uploaded At: March 13, 2023

Post-Trial

Post Trial Information

Study Withdrawal

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information

Intervention

Is the intervention completed?
No
Data Collection Complete
Data Publication

Data Publication

Is public data available?
No

Program Files

Program Files
Reports, Papers & Other Materials

Relevant Paper(s)

Reports & Other Materials