Back to History Current Version

Supporting Evidence Building in Child Welfare: The Evaluation of Project Connect

Last registered on April 25, 2025

Pre-Trial

Trial Information

General Information

Title
Supporting Evidence Building in Child Welfare: The Evaluation of Project Connect
RCT ID
AEARCTR-0007273
Initial registration date
April 23, 2021

Initial registration date is when the trial was registered.

It corresponds to when the registration was submitted to the Registry to be reviewed for publication.

First published
April 26, 2021, 10:41 AM EDT

First published corresponds to when the trial was first made public on the Registry after being reviewed.

Last updated
April 25, 2025, 10:23 AM EDT

Last updated is the most recent time when changes to the trial's registration were published.

Locations

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information

Primary Investigator

Affiliation
The Urban Institute

Other Primary Investigator(s)

PI Affiliation
Urban Institute
PI Affiliation
The Urban Institute

Additional Trial Information

Status
In development
Start date
2021-04-01
End date
2027-03-31
Secondary IDs
HHSP233201500064I_HHSP23337014T
Prior work
This trial does not extend or rely on any prior RCTs.
Abstract
Project Connect is a comprehensive home visitation intervention that targets child welfare-involved, substance-affected families with children and adolescents ages 0 to 17 through home-based services and treatment. The program addresses the complex needs of families affected by substance use by providing intensive, long-term services aimed at strengthening families, addressing parental substance use, and helping parents recover while keeping children safe.

The study used a randomized controlled trial (RCT) to evaluate the causal impact of Project Connect services on families experiencing substance use in the Rhode Island child welfare system and to compare the child welfare service trajectories (e.g., placement and length of time in care) of families affected by substance use who received Project Connect services with those who received services as usual. We also collected qualitative data, which included the interviews and focus groups, as part of an implementation study. Families affected by substance use with an open child protective services case in Rhode Island were randomly referred for substance use services – either to Project Connect or to other usual services. The final full study sample includes 230 families, 192 families whose children were in out-of-home care at the start of the study (96 treatment and 96 control) and 34 families who children were in home at the start of the study (17 treatment and 17 control). The majority of our analyses will focus on the 192 “reunification” families. We will examine 24-months post randomization outcomes. If feasible, we will also examine 30-month post randomization outcomes.
External Link(s)

Registration Citation

Citation
Kuhns, Catherine, Marla McDaniel and Michael Pergamit. 2025. "Supporting Evidence Building in Child Welfare: The Evaluation of Project Connect." AEA RCT Registry. April 25. https://doi.org/10.1257/rct.7273-2.0
Sponsors & Partners

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information
Experimental Details

Interventions

Intervention(s)
Project Connect is a home-based intervention for families involved in the child welfare system affected by substance use. Eligible families have children or adolescents ages 0 to 17. The program aims to maintain children safely in their homes (preventing admission to out-of-home care) or to facilitate reunification when children have been placed out-of-home. The program’s theory of change is that child safety, well-being, and permanency are achieved when parents have resources that support recovery, enhance parenting capacity, strengthen family relationships and functioning, and improve families’ living conditions. Project Connect works with families to build those resources through substance use assessment; individual and family counseling; parent education; pediatric nursing assessment and services; relapse prevention planning; assistance with transportation; court advocacy; supplemental visitations; 24/7 emergency on call support; domestic violence support; and aftercare services following DCYF involvement. Project Connect also links families with community resources, including substance abuse treatment agencies; child care; health care; housing; mental health; legal services; and medical services. The Project Connect model emphasizes deep and trusting relationships with caregivers as a key to connecting families to resources and achieving intended outcomes.
Intervention Start Date
2021-04-01
Intervention End Date
2024-06-28

Primary Outcomes

Primary Outcomes (end points)
1. Child reunifications with family from out-of-home care
2. Child reunifications with family from out-of-home care with no placement disruptions within the prior 6 months
Primary Outcomes (explanation)
Child reunification will be measured as the probability that a child who is out of the home at the time of randomization is reunited with their parents. We will examine 1) the share of children reunified at 24 months post randomization; and 2) the share of children reunified at 24 months post randomization with no placement disruptions within the prior 6 months. The latter measure represents reunification stability. We also note that higher rates of stable reunifications imply lower rates of reported abuse and neglect.

Secondary Outcomes

Secondary Outcomes (end points)
1. Differences in the share of children whose caregivers have a re-report of abuse or neglect (reunification families only)
2. Differences in the speed of reunification (reunification families only)
3. Among combined reunification and preservation families at 24 months post randomization, the share of children in a stable in-home placement for the prior 6 months
Secondary Outcomes (explanation)
A stable, in-home placement will be measured as the likelihood that a child is not in foster care and is living in a permanent family setting, which may include living with parents, living with kin, adoption, or other permanent situation. The full study sample is 226 families, which includes 34 families who had an open child welfare case but whose children remained at home at the start of the study (i.e., preservation families). The last secondary outcome listed above will be an analysis of this full sample.

Experimental Design

Experimental Design
The evaluation employed a family level RCT in one site. Randomization occurred between April 2021 and June 2023.Our randomization protocol had caseworkers in the public child welfare agency refer families requiring substance use services to the agency's Central Referral Unit (CRU). The CRU stratified the referrals separating preservation families (i.e., children at-home) from reunification families (i.e., children in out-of-home care). The CRU manager entered information into Urban’s online randomization tool, which provided her the study group assignment. The CRU manager randomized in pairs so the treatment and control groups were of equal size with roughly comparable referral dates. Under our randomization protocol, all families flagged by their caseworker as having a substance use concern and subsequently referred to the agency's CRU were eligible for the study, and randomized.
Experimental Design Details
Not available
Randomization Method
The specific referral and randomization strategy leveraged an existing referral form that caseworkers completed and sent to a central referral unit (CRU) at the public child welfare agency. At the CRU, a staff member reviewed each referral form and randomized all eligible families into either treatment or control. The staff member used a customized online randomization tool designed by the Urban Institute. The randomization tool collected the family’s identification number, whether they were a preservation or reunification family, and their referral form and determined whether a family would be referred to Project Connect or services as usual. The tool used a one-to-one randomization ratio, with one family randomized to treatment for every control family.
Randomization Unit
Randomization took place at the household (family) level.
Was the treatment clustered?
No

Experiment Characteristics

Sample size: planned number of clusters
N/A
Sample size: planned number of observations
The full study sample is 226 families. The majority of our planned research questions focus only on reunification families – that is, the 192 families whose children were in out-of-home care at the start of the study (96 treatment and 96 control) The study sample also includes 34 families who had an open child welfare case but whose children remained at home at the start of the study (i.e., preservation families). These families are included in one analysis as part of the list of secondary outcomes.
Sample size (or number of clusters) by treatment arms
-96 "reunification" families in the control group
-96 "reunification" families in the treatment group
-17 “preservation” families in the control group
-17 “preservation" families in the treatment group
Minimum detectable effect size for main outcomes (accounting for sample design and clustering)
We estimated Minimum Detectable Effect (MDE) sizes for Intent-to-Treat (ITT) estimates. We calculated the MDE as the impact divided by the comparison group standard deviation (sqrt(m(1-m)), where m = the proportion of the control group with a “successful” outcome (i.e., reunification). The MDE was calculated assuming a randomization ratio of one treatment (Project Connect) to one control (services as usual) with an alpha level of 0.05, a two-tailed test with 80 percent power, and a sample size of 192. This produced a minimum detectable effect size of 0.40.
IRB

Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)

IRB Name
Urban Institute IRB
IRB Approval Date
2025-04-24
IRB Approval Number
0189