x

Please fill out this short user survey of only 3 questions in order to help us improve the site. We appreciate your feedback!
Pinging Entrepreneurial Ecosystems
Last registered on May 05, 2021

Pre-Trial

Trial Information
General Information
Title
Pinging Entrepreneurial Ecosystems
RCT ID
AEARCTR-0007473
Initial registration date
May 05, 2021
Last updated
May 05, 2021 11:23 AM EDT
Location(s)

This section is unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access to this information.

Request Information
Primary Investigator
Affiliation
Other Primary Investigator(s)
PI Affiliation
Max Planck Institute for Innovation and Competition
PI Affiliation
Max Planck Institute for Innovation and Competition
Additional Trial Information
Status
In development
Start date
2021-04-19
End date
2021-12-31
Secondary IDs
Abstract
A successful entrepreneurial ecosystem (EE) shows a strong culture of support for entrepreneurship expressed through culture, leadership and and social networks (Stam & van de Ven 2021). We assess entrepreneurs’ willingness to support different levels of start-up ecosystems through a factorial cluster trial in the field. We hypothesize that entrepreneurs are more willing to support their more local EE; that this willingness varies with EE; and that a common industry also plays a role. We plan to contribute to research by providing an additional quantitative measure of the quality of an EE and by identifying an additional lever for policy to increase start-up activity and economic growth.
External Link(s)
Registration Citation
Citation
Defort, Aaron, Dietmar Harhoff and Michael Rose. 2021. "Pinging Entrepreneurial Ecosystems." AEA RCT Registry. May 05. https://doi.org/10.1257/rct.7473-1.0.
Experimental Details
Interventions
Intervention(s)
We send out slightly varied e-mails asking to participate in a survey. The e-mails we aim to send out will have different texts, triggering different feelings of belonging in the participants. Otherwise the mails will be the same mentioning the purpose of the survey, a GDPR claimer and the executing institutions.
The control and treatment interventions are corresponding to a ever growing higher level of relatedness to the subjects in order to isolate the effect. The changes in text should have an impact on the response rate which we interpret as stronger feeling of belonging.
Intervention Start Date
2021-05-05
Intervention End Date
2021-05-31
Primary Outcomes
Primary Outcomes (end points)
Click rate on the survey link
Primary Outcomes (explanation)
The click rate will be driven by the e-mail content, which is our primary intervention
Secondary Outcomes
Secondary Outcomes (end points)
Response rate
Secondary Outcomes (explanation)
The response rate to the survey is driven by the e-mail content and the interest subjects take in the survey.
Experimental Design
Experimental Design
The above-mentioned interventions are allocated in two ways. Since we are interested in geographical entities we are clustering the participants according to their location (cluster trial). As discussed above our experiment has four arms in order to isolate the mechanisms (factorial trial). The interventions are allocated randomly inside of the clusters.
Experimental Design Details
Not available
Randomization Method
Randomization was done in an office by a computer. For this we used the Pandas package in Python (command: random) with a seed to ensure replicability.
Randomization Unit
Individual randomization inside of clusters
Was the treatment clustered?
No
Experiment Characteristics
Sample size: planned number of clusters
110 Ecosystems, plus ca. 11,500 unclustered subjects
1 Ecosystem will be used as pilot
Sample size: planned number of observations
ca. 58.000 start-up executives (founders, CEO, Partner, etc.) 684 start-up executives will be used in a pilot
Sample size (or number of clusters) by treatment arms
ca. 14.500 subjects per arm
Minimum detectable effect size for main outcomes (accounting for sample design and clustering)
If baseline response rate is 2% and N=29,000 (i.e. half of real sample), we can detect an effect size of 0.49-0.57 p.p. in changes in response rate (i.e. 24,5-28,5% with 0.8-0.9 power). If baseline response rate is 1% and N=29,000 (i.e. half of real sample), we can detect an effect size of 0.35-0.41 p.p. in changes in response rate (i.e. 35-41% with 0.8-0.9 power). Similar trials have found effect sizes of 18.7%-54.4%, which could be confirmed in an early pilot of this project (N=124, effect size: 55%). To validate the assumptions about effect sizes we do a pilot with the full technical setup with N=684.
IRB
INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARDS (IRBs)
IRB Name
IRB Approval Date
IRB Approval Number