Back to History Current Version

Happy Spouse, Happy House: Collaborative Risk-taking and Marital Satisfaction

Last registered on July 16, 2021

Pre-Trial

Trial Information

General Information

Title
Happy Spouse, Happy House: Collaborative Risk-taking and Marital Satisfaction
RCT ID
AEARCTR-0007900
Initial registration date
July 09, 2021

Initial registration date is when the trial was registered.

It corresponds to when the registration was submitted to the Registry to be reviewed for publication.

First published
July 09, 2021, 12:46 PM EDT

First published corresponds to when the trial was first made public on the Registry after being reviewed.

Last updated
July 16, 2021, 11:25 PM EDT

Last updated is the most recent time when changes to the trial's registration were published.

Locations

Region

Primary Investigator

Affiliation
NYU Shanghai

Other Primary Investigator(s)

PI Affiliation
New York University Shanghai

Additional Trial Information

Status
On going
Start date
2021-07-14
End date
2022-06-01
Secondary IDs
Abstract
In this study we explore the links between marital satisfaction and how married couple's approach decision-making under risk. We plan to give out online surveys and conduct online experiments with participants through WeChat video chat. We plan to recruit 100 pairs of Chinese married couples who are both in their first marriage. Couples will first make some economic decisions apart, then brought together to make these choices together. Half of the couples will be informed what their partner chose before they decide together; the other half will not be informed. We are interested in whether a marriage where couples' decision making tends to be wife-dominant or husband-dominant is associated with higher marital happiness, and whether awareness of one's partner's preferences influence the decision-making process and decision outcomes.
External Link(s)

Registration Citation

Citation
Chen, Yumeng and Eric Set. 2021. "Happy Spouse, Happy House: Collaborative Risk-taking and Marital Satisfaction." AEA RCT Registry. July 16. https://doi.org/10.1257/rct.7900-2.1
Experimental Details

Interventions

Intervention(s)
Married couples participating online with an experimenter make simple portfolio allocation choices separately and then together in an incentivized lab-style experiment. A measure of marital satisfaction and other measures of interest will be collected.
Intervention Start Date
2021-07-14
Intervention End Date
2022-06-01

Primary Outcomes

Primary Outcomes (end points)
a. The amount allocated to the "risky option" by individuals and by the couple.
b. Individual measures of marital satisfaction

Primary Outcomes (explanation)
We hope to characterize a couple’s choice in terms of the choices of the individuals, supported by other measures gathered in the study (e.g., beliefs, relative age, gender, relative income).

We are particularly interested in whether marital satisfaction correlates to the aspects of the individuals’ preferences (e.g., the difference between husband and wife) and/or how couples make their choice (e.g., if one member dominates the decision-making).

Secondary Outcomes

Secondary Outcomes (end points)
Comparison of economic decisions (individual and collaborative) when couples are informed by the experimenter of their spouse's choices versus when they are not.
Secondary Outcomes (explanation)
Couples will be assigned randomly to either an INFO (told spouse's choice) or NOINFO treatment.

Experimental Design

Experimental Design
Basic demographic information, a measure of relationship satisfaction, a survey of cognitive reflection, choices in a portfolio allocation task (made individually and with their marriage partner), belief about partner's choices, and audio/video of couples making these choices will be collected from participants.
Experimental Design Details
The couple should be participating in the research at the same time. The research will be conducted through Qualtrics online survey and WeChat video chat. The couples should be using separate devices and located in separate spaces (for privacy).

Consent form: Participants will first receive the consent form before participating in the research, which they will sign through Qualtrics.

Interview: An interview will be conducted to collect demographic information from the couple (birth date, current residence, place grow up, education, monthly income, number of children, length of marriage).

Surveys (Household decision-making, RAS, CRT):
After the interview, the couple will both receive two surveys:
Survey 1:
- A question related to the way the couple make household financial decisions
- A seven-item "Relationship Assessment Scale" to measure marital assessment (Hendrick, 1988)
Survey 2:
- A three-item "Cognitive Reflection Test" to measure cognitive ability (Frederick, 2005)

Main task (Individual decision-making):
- Instructions on portfolio allocation task (with an example and oral quizzes with the experimenter)

- Participants are then asked to make individual decisions in three risk allocation tasks (with three multipliers: P=1.5, P=2, P=2.5) . The tasks were designed by Gneezy and Potters (1997), and the three multipliers were also used by Ertac and Gurdal (2012) in their study.

Beliefs:
After both have finished the main task, individuals complete a survey that asks them to indicate how much they believe their partner has allocated in the previous three scenarios. This is incentivized.

Collaborative decision-making (verbal responses will be collected, and their discussion process will be video recorded):
After they have both finished the surveys, the couple will be brought together to make decisions on the same three scenarios together.
- In the INFO treatment, couples will be informed what their partner chose before they decide together. Only after they have made their decision in a particular scenario will we inform them of their choices in the next scenario.
- In the NOINFO treatment, couples will not be informed what their partner chose before they decide together.

Payment:
At the end of the experiment, only one scenario (one decision) will be randomly selected for payment by rolling a 6-sided die. The selected scenario (decision) will determine both the husband's and the wife's payoffs. That is, every decision a participant makes is made on behalf of him/her and his/her spouse.

For groups with NOINFO treatment, if individual scenario (choice) is selected for payment, there is a 25% chance that we will use the choice of a previous couple for payment to ensure that the selected individual's previous choices will not be revealed to the other person. We will ask participants in NOINFO to privately assign die rolls to outcomes at the end of the main task (individual).
Randomization Method
For assignment to the INFO/NOINFO condition: Coin flip by the researcher before the experiment starts
Randomization Unit
Married couple
Was the treatment clustered?
No

Experiment Characteristics

Sample size: planned number of clusters
100 pairs of married couples
Sample size: planned number of observations
200 individuals
Sample size (or number of clusters) by treatment arms
50 pairs of couples (100 individuals) in each treatment
Minimum detectable effect size for main outcomes (accounting for sample design and clustering)
IRB

Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)

IRB Name
New York University Shanghai
IRB Approval Date
2021-07-04
IRB Approval Number
2021-030

Post-Trial

Post Trial Information

Study Withdrawal

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information

Intervention

Is the intervention completed?
No
Data Collection Complete
Data Publication

Data Publication

Is public data available?
No

Program Files

Program Files
Reports, Papers & Other Materials

Relevant Paper(s)

Reports & Other Materials