Beliefs About the Stock Market and Investment Choices: Evidence from a Field Experiment

Last registered on September 26, 2022

Pre-Trial

Trial Information

General Information

Title
Beliefs About the Stock Market and Investment Choices: Evidence from a Field Experiment
RCT ID
AEARCTR-0008462
Initial registration date
October 29, 2021

Initial registration date is when the trial was registered.

It corresponds to when the registration was submitted to the Registry to be reviewed for publication.

First published
November 01, 2021, 12:36 PM EDT

First published corresponds to when the trial was first made public on the Registry after being reviewed.

Last updated
September 26, 2022, 7:39 AM EDT

Last updated is the most recent time when changes to the trial's registration were published.

Locations

Region

Primary Investigator

Affiliation
University of Copenhagen

Other Primary Investigator(s)

PI Affiliation
University of Bonn
PI Affiliation
Goethe University Frankfurt
PI Affiliation
WU Vienna

Additional Trial Information

Status
Completed
Start date
2019-09-01
End date
2019-12-31
Secondary IDs
Prior work
This trial does not extend or rely on any prior RCTs.
Abstract
We study households' beliefs about the autocorrelation of annual returns of the aggregate stock market and the role of these beliefs in investment decisions. Based on a survey of retail investors at a German online bank, we document substantial heterogeneity in individuals' perceived autocorrelation, with a majority believing in mean reversion of returns. These beliefs predict how respondents adjust their portfolios in response to market movements, as measured in administrative account data. We provide a random half of our respondents with historical information on the low predictive power of realized returns for year-ahead returns. The intervention persistently reduces respondents' perceived autocorrelation, and shifts their expected year-ahead return accordingly. We find only minor adjustments of investment decisions in the short term. However, among those believing in mean reversion before the intervention, treated respondents display a significantly smaller increase in equity purchases in response to the COVID-19 stock market crash four to five months after the treatment. Our results suggest that heterogeneity in perceived models is a causal driver of trade in asset markets, and may more generally lead to differences in economic decisions across individuals.
External Link(s)

Registration Citation

Citation
Laudenbach, Christine et al. 2022. "Beliefs About the Stock Market and Investment Choices: Evidence from a Field Experiment." AEA RCT Registry. September 26. https://doi.org/10.1257/rct.8462-1.1
Experimental Details

Interventions

Intervention(s)
Between September and November 2019, we conducted a survey of about 2,000 stockholders that are clients of a major German online bank. In our survey, we elicit respondents' beliefs about the historical autocorrelation of stock returns based on a new, individual-level measure. Specifically, we first ask respondents to think of six intervals of historical annual return realizations of the German stock market index (DAX) during the last 50 years. For each return interval, respondents are asked to provide an estimate of the average return of the DAX over the subsequent 12 months if the return over the previous 12 months fell into that interval. Subsequently, a random half of the respondents are informed about the actual historical conditional mean return over the following year for each of the six scenarios of returns over the previous year. Actual conditional mean returns in the six scenarios vary only narrowly around the unconditional historical average return of the DAX of 8.5 percent, illustrating the historical low degree of predictive power of recent returns for future returns at the annual frequency. In both the main survey and a follow-up survey conducted four weeks later, we then measure our respondents' posterior beliefs about the autocorrelation of stock returns and the return over the 12 months after the survey.

In July and August 2022, we conducted four additional surveys:
- an additional experimental investor survey using an analogous approach as pursued in our main study to measure and shift beliefs about return predictability based on the price-dividend ratio.
- an additional descriptive investor survey to study the sources of investors' beliefs about the autocorrelation of returns.
- an additional general population survey from Germany measuring respondents' perceived autocorrelation of returns.
- an additional general population survey from the US measuring respondents' perceived autocorrelation of returns.
Intervention (Hidden)
Intervention Start Date
2019-09-01
Intervention End Date
2019-12-31

Primary Outcomes

Primary Outcomes (end points)
Beliefs about the autocorrelation of stock returns, stock return expectations, trading behavior
Primary Outcomes (explanation)

Secondary Outcomes

Secondary Outcomes (end points)
Secondary Outcomes (explanation)

Experimental Design

Experimental Design
Our setup generates exogenous variation in individuals' beliefs about the autocorrelation of aggregate stock returns, which in turn allows us to examine whether subjective models of the stock market are a causal driver of people's return expectations. Moreover, by linking the treatment variation with administrative account data on trading decisions before and after the intervention, we can obtain causal evidence on the role of individuals' perceived models of the stock market in their investment decisions.
Experimental Design Details
Randomization Method
By computer.
Randomization Unit
individual
Was the treatment clustered?
No

Experiment Characteristics

Sample size: planned number of clusters
Main study: 2,083 individuals

Additional experimental investor survey: 772 individuals
Additional descriptive investor survey: 227 individuals
Additional general population survey from Germany: 504 individuals
Additional general population survey from the US: 508 individuals
Sample size: planned number of observations
Main study: 2,083 individuals Additional experimental investor survey: 772 individuals Additional descriptive investor survey: 227 individuals Additional general population survey from Germany: 504 individuals Additional general population survey from the US: 508 individuals
Sample size (or number of clusters) by treatment arms
Main study: 1,058 individuals in the control group; 1,025 individuals in the treatment group.

Additional experimental investor survey: 336 individuals in the control group; 357 individuals in the treatment group.
Minimum detectable effect size for main outcomes (accounting for sample design and clustering)
IRB

Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)

IRB Name
Goethe University Frankfurt
IRB Approval Date
2019-07-31
IRB Approval Number
N/A

Post-Trial

Post Trial Information

Study Withdrawal

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information

Intervention

Is the intervention completed?
Yes
Intervention Completion Date
December 31, 2019, 12:00 +00:00
Data Collection Complete
Yes
Data Collection Completion Date
December 31, 2019, 12:00 +00:00
Final Sample Size: Number of Clusters (Unit of Randomization)
2,083 individuals
Was attrition correlated with treatment status?
No
Final Sample Size: Total Number of Observations
2,083 individuals
Final Sample Size (or Number of Clusters) by Treatment Arms
1,058 individuals in the control group; 1,025 individuals in the treatment group.
Data Publication

Data Publication

Is public data available?
No

Program Files

Program Files
No
Reports, Papers & Other Materials

Relevant Paper(s)

Reports & Other Materials