| Field | Before | After |
|---|---|---|
| Field Last Published | Before June 20, 2022 07:11 AM | After October 20, 2023 10:24 AM |
| Field Study Withdrawn | Before | After No |
| Field Intervention Completion Date | Before | After December 09, 2021 |
| Field Data Collection Complete | Before | After Yes |
| Field Final Sample Size: Number of Clusters (Unit of Randomization) | Before | After 2840 over 8 treatments |
| Field Was attrition correlated with treatment status? | Before | After No |
| Field Final Sample Size: Total Number of Observations | Before | After 840 |
| Field Final Sample Size (or Number of Clusters) by Treatment Arms | Before | After Animal welfare Uniform Low: 354 Animal welfare Uniform High: 360 Animal welfare Differentiated Low: 361 Animal welfare Differentiated High: 355 Climate Uniform Low: 359 Climate Uniform High: 350 Climate Differentiated Low: 342 Climate Differentiated High: 359 |
| Field Public Data URL | Before | After https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/YNMG1R |
| Field Is there a restricted access data set available on request? | Before | After No |
| Field Program Files | Before | After Yes |
| Field Program Files URL | Before | After https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/YNMG1R |
| Field Data Collection Completion Date | Before | After December 09, 2021 |
| Field Is data available for public use? | Before | After Yes |
| Field | Before | After |
|---|---|---|
| Field Paper Abstract | Before | After A tax on meat could help address the climate impact and animal welfare issues associated with the production of meat. Through a referendum choice experiment with more than 2,800 German citizens, we elicited support for a tax on meat by varying the following tax attributes: level and differentiation thereof, justification and salience of behavioural effects. Only at the lowest tax level tested do all tax variants receive support from most voters. Support is generally stronger if the tax is justified by animal welfare rather than climate change mitigation. Differentiated taxes that link the tax rate to the harmfulness of the product do not receive higher support than a uniform tax; this indifference is not driven by a failure to anticipate the differential impacts on consumption. While the introduction of meat taxation remains politically challenging, our results underscore the need for policymakers to clearly communicate underlying reasons for the tax and its intended behavioural effect. |
| Field Paper Citation | Before | After Perino, G., & Schwickert, H. (2023). Animal welfare is a stronger determinant of public support for meat taxation than climate change mitigation in Germany. Nature Food, 4(2), 160-169. |
| Field Paper URL | Before | After https://doi.org/10.1038/s43016-023-00696-y |