Freedom From Hunger Savings Training Evaluation

Last registered on October 04, 2013

Pre-Trial

Trial Information

General Information

Title
Freedom From Hunger Savings Training Evaluation
RCT ID
AEARCTR-0000086
First published
October 04, 2013, 10:43 AM EDT

First published corresponds to when the trial was first made public on the Registry after being reviewed.

Locations

Region

Primary Investigator

Affiliation
Wharton

Other Primary Investigator(s)

PI Affiliation
Warwick

Additional Trial Information

Status
On going
Start date
2011-01-01
End date
2014-03-01
Secondary IDs
Abstract
A large body of evidence from both developed and developing countries suggests that low income households have strikingly low levels of financial literacy. A number of government, non-profit, and for profit institutions have created free or highly subsidized programs to provide basic financial literacy training to low income households. Despite the popularity of such programs, we have little empirical evidence on whether these programs actually improve welfare. In this study, we conduct a randomized control trial with real microfinance borrowers in Northern India to determine whether a financial literacy program improves financial literacy levels and increases the achievement of savings goals. The savings program we evaluate builds on prior interventions by providing (1) substantially more interactive time with the instructor (nine 1 hour sessions), (2) follow up visits to monitor progress, and (3) by harnessing the group structure of microfinance to allow for the possibility that learning with others increases retention. We randomly assigned one hundred microfinance groups to receive the financial literacy training program, and one hundred groups to serve as a control group.
External Link(s)

Registration Citation

Citation
Anagol, Santosh and Anandi Mani. 2013. "Freedom From Hunger Savings Training Evaluation." AEA RCT Registry. October 04. https://doi.org/10.1257/rct.86-1.0
Former Citation
Anagol, Santosh and Anandi Mani. 2013. "Freedom From Hunger Savings Training Evaluation." AEA RCT Registry. October 04. https://www.socialscienceregistry.org/trials/86/history/424
Experimental Details

Interventions

Intervention(s)
A large body of evidence from both developed and developing countries suggests that low income households have strikingly low levels of financial literacy. A number of government, non-profit, and for profit institutions have created free or highly subsidized programs to provide basic financial literacy training to low income households. Despite the popularity of such programs, we have little empirical evidence on whether these programs actually improve welfare. In this study, we conduct a randomized control trial with real microfinance borrowers in Northern India to determine whether a financial literacy program improves financial literacy levels and increases the achievement of savings goals. The savings program we evaluate builds on prior interventions by providing (1) substantially more interactive time with the instructor (nine 1 hour sessions), (2) follow up visits to monitor progress, and (3) by harnessing the group structure of microfinance to allow for the possibility that learning with others increases retention. We randomly assigned one hundred microfinance groups to receive the financial literacy training program, and one hundred groups to serve as a control group.
Intervention Start Date
2011-07-01
Intervention End Date
2012-01-01

Primary Outcomes

Primary Outcomes (end points)
Formal and informal savings, financial knowledge, household portfolio choice, consumption.
Primary Outcomes (explanation)
Described in detail in analysis plan.

Secondary Outcomes

Secondary Outcomes (end points)
Secondary Outcomes (explanation)

Experimental Design

Experimental Design
The study covers 200 borrowing groups in 200 villages spread across three districts in the north Indian state of Uttar Pradesh, India. Uttar Pradesh is India's second most poor state (VMW 2012), and ranks 24th out of 28 Indian states based on its Human Development Index (Ministry of Women and Child Development (2012)). Two hundred Sonata borrowing groups were selected and grouped into pairs according to an algorithm that minimized the overall geographical distance between villages within a pair (Mckenzie and Bruhn (2009)). One borrowing group in each of these pairs was randomly chosen to receive the savings training program; the other borrowing group in the pair served as the control. Paired matching and randomization was chosen to maximize the statistical power of the design, as described in Mckenzie and Bruhn (2009).
Experimental Design Details
Randomization Method
Villages were paired according nearest geography and then randomized in to treatment and control by computer.
Randomization Unit
Village
Was the treatment clustered?
Yes

Experiment Characteristics

Sample size: planned number of clusters
200 Villages
Sample size: planned number of observations
Approximately 3,000 depending on number MFI clients in villages.
Sample size (or number of clusters) by treatment arms
100 villages receive training program, 100 villages as control.
Minimum detectable effect size for main outcomes (accounting for sample design and clustering)
IRB

Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)

IRB Name
University of Pennsylvania, Office of Regulatory Affairs, Institutional Review Board
IRB Approval Date
2011-02-08
IRB Approval Number
813101
Analysis Plan

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information

Post-Trial

Post Trial Information

Study Withdrawal

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information

Intervention

Is the intervention completed?
No
Data Collection Complete
Data Publication

Data Publication

Is public data available?
No

Program Files

Program Files
Reports, Papers & Other Materials

Relevant Paper(s)

Reports & Other Materials