The origins of gender differences in competitiveness and earnings expectations

Last registered on February 03, 2022

Pre-Trial

Trial Information

General Information

Title
The origins of gender differences in competitiveness and earnings expectations
RCT ID
AEARCTR-0008935
Initial registration date
February 03, 2022

Initial registration date is when the trial was registered.

It corresponds to when the registration was submitted to the Registry to be reviewed for publication.

First published
February 03, 2022, 5:50 PM EST

First published corresponds to when the trial was first made public on the Registry after being reviewed.

Locations

Region

Primary Investigator

Affiliation
JMU Würzburg

Other Primary Investigator(s)

Additional Trial Information

Status
Completed
Start date
2011-09-01
End date
2018-02-28
Secondary IDs
Prior work
This trial is based on or builds upon one or more prior RCTs.
Abstract
We aim to explore whether and how the social environment at a young age differentially influences the willingness to compete of girls and boys as well as their earnings expectations. In a sample of German adolescents, we first investigate how the competitive preferences of girls and boys vary with socioeconomic status (SES) and the preferences of their mothers. To elicit the competitiveness of the children and their mothers, we use a novel easy-to-use and validated measure developed by Buser et al. (2021). We then analyze the causal impact of a change to the social environment. More specifically, we examine whether giving low-SES children randomized access to a well-established and intensive mentoring program has an impact on individual willingness to compete as well as earnings expectations. For a period of about one year, treated children are provided with a mentor whose brief is to act as a role model and to enrich the social environment of the child. Volunteer mentors are predominantly university students and all girls receive a female mentor, thereby exposing low-SES girls to a successful female role model. Role models have been shown to be influential for the choices of young women, for example, in the context of education (Carlana, 2019; Porter and Serra, 2020; Breda et al., 2020). We therefore expect a positive impact of the mentoring intervention on the willingness to compete of low-SES girls, potentially resulting in a reduction in the gender gap. Moreover, there is mounting evidence that individual preferences for competition predict labor market outcomes (Reuben et al., 2015; Buser et al., 2021). Therefore, about six years after the end of the intervention, we administered a questionnaire in which we elicit adolescents' beliefs about their likely earnings at age 30.
External Link(s)

Registration Citation

Citation
Kosse, Fabian. 2022. "The origins of gender differences in competitiveness and earnings expectations." AEA RCT Registry. February 03. https://doi.org/10.1257/rct.8935-1.0
Experimental Details

Interventions

Intervention(s)
The intervention is a well-established non-profit mentoring program called “Balu und Du” (Baloo and You). In this program, elementary school children are provided with a mentor for the duration of one year. The mentors, called Baloos, are mostly female university students (aged from 18 to 30) who voluntarily care for their mentees, called Mowglis. All girls in our sample received a female mentor, while a minority of boys had a male mentor. The mentors act as role models and “benevolent friends” who encourage the acquisition of new ideas and skills by enriching the social environment of the children (Müller-Kohlenberg and Drexler, 2013). On a practical level, a mentored child typically spends one afternoon per week in one-to-one interaction with his/her mentor. During this time, the mentor and the mentee engage in joint activities, which are adapted to the individual needs, strengths, and interests of the child (and mentor). To date, the Balu und Du mentoring program has arranged and supervised around 13,000 mentor-child relationships in more than 50 different locations in Germany.

Most mentors are female and all girls in our sample receive a female mentor, thereby providing low-SES girls with a female role model. Role models have been shown to influence the choices of young women, for example, in the context of education (Carlana, 2019; Porter and Serra, 2020; Breda et al., 2020). Most mentors are university students and past studies have also shown that both female and male university students and graduates are typically more willing to compete compared to the rest of the population (see, for example, Buser et al., 2021).
Intervention Start Date
2011-10-01
Intervention End Date
2013-01-31

Primary Outcomes

Primary Outcomes (end points)
Willingness to compete (developed and validated by Buser et al. (2021)) and expected earnings (as applied in Boneva et al. (2021)).
Primary Outcomes (explanation)

Secondary Outcomes

Secondary Outcomes (end points)
Secondary Outcomes (explanation)

Experimental Design

Experimental Design
We recruited participants and their parents from the two cities Cologne and Bonn in Germany. In 2011, we invited all families living in those cities with children born between September 2003 and August 2004 to participate in a mentoring program, as well as one third of families with children born between September 2002 and August 2003 (N=14,451). We truthfully informed parents that, due to capacity constraints, participation in the program was not guaranteed. 1626 families indicated a willingness to participate and answered a short questionnaire including questions on income, education and whether both parents lived in the same household. We focus on those children whose parents met at least one of the following three criteria: (i) Equivalence income of the household is lower than 1065 Euro, corresponding to the 30th percentile of the German income distribution. (ii) Neither parent has a school-leaving degree qualifying for university studies. (iii) Parents do not live in the same household. We invited these children (N=700) and their parents for a baseline interview conducted in September to October 2011. 590 children and their parents participated in the baseline interview and gave their written consent to allow the transmission of their address to the organization running the mentoring program. This is our main sample. Out of this sample, 212 families were randomly selected to be treated (“treatment group”), the remaining 378 families form the control group.

We also recruited a high socio-economic status (SES) comparison group from the children whose parents did not meet either of the three criteria listed above (N=150 invited, N=122 participated in the baseline interview and gave written consent).
Experimental Design Details
Randomization Method
randomization done in office by a computer using STATA.
Randomization Unit
Individual
Was the treatment clustered?
No

Experiment Characteristics

Sample size: planned number of clusters
590 children
Sample size: planned number of observations
590 children
Sample size (or number of clusters) by treatment arms
212 children were randomly selected to be treated (“treatment group”), the remaining 378 children form the control group.
Minimum detectable effect size for main outcomes (accounting for sample design and clustering)
IRB

Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)

IRB Name
IRB Approval Date
IRB Approval Number

Post-Trial

Post Trial Information

Study Withdrawal

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information

Intervention

Is the intervention completed?
Yes
Intervention Completion Date
January 31, 2013, 12:00 +00:00
Data Collection Complete
Yes
Data Collection Completion Date
February 28, 2018, 12:00 +00:00
Final Sample Size: Number of Clusters (Unit of Randomization)
382 children
Was attrition correlated with treatment status?
No
Final Sample Size: Total Number of Observations
382 children
Final Sample Size (or Number of Clusters) by Treatment Arms
242 in the control group, 140 in the treatment group
Data Publication

Data Publication

Is public data available?
No

Program Files

Program Files
Reports, Papers & Other Materials

Relevant Paper(s)

Reports & Other Materials