Measuring How Users Value Meta’s Family of Apps and Other Digital Goods

Last registered on February 22, 2022

Pre-Trial

Trial Information

General Information

Title
Measuring How Users Value Meta’s Family of Apps and Other Digital Goods
RCT ID
AEARCTR-0008990
Initial registration date
February 16, 2022

Initial registration date is when the trial was registered.

It corresponds to when the registration was submitted to the Registry to be reviewed for publication.

First published
February 22, 2022, 1:25 PM EST

First published corresponds to when the trial was first made public on the Registry after being reviewed.

Last updated
February 22, 2022, 2:17 PM EST

Last updated is the most recent time when changes to the trial's registration were published.

Locations

Region
Region
Region
Region
Region
Region
Region
Region
Region
Region
Region
Region
Region
Region

Primary Investigator

Affiliation
Meta Platforms Inc.

Other Primary Investigator(s)

PI Affiliation
Stanford University
PI Affiliation
University of Texas at Austin
PI Affiliation
Meta Platforms, Inc.
PI Affiliation
Meta Platforms, Inc.
PI Affiliation
Meta Platforms, Inc.
PI Affiliation
Stanford University
PI Affiliation
Meta Platforms, Inc.

Additional Trial Information

Status
In development
Start date
2022-02-28
End date
2023-02-28
Secondary IDs
Prior work
This trial does not extend or rely on any prior RCTs.
Abstract
We will administer incentivized, on-platform surveys in 15 countries using the double-bounded dichotomous choice (DBDC) method to elicit users’ valuation for Facebook. We will also elicit users’ hypothetical valuation of Instagram and Whatsapp using the single-bounded dichotomous choice (SBDC) method. In both DBDC and SBDC valuations, we will randomly vary offer values across users. Finally, we will also elicit users’ hypothetical valuations for other digital goods using the best-worst scaling (BWS) method where the options presented to users will vary randomly. We will run these surveys on the Facebook platform. We will estimate the median valuation of users for each app in each country.
External Link(s)

Registration Citation

Citation
Brynjolfsson, Erik et al. 2022. "Measuring How Users Value Meta’s Family of Apps and Other Digital Goods." AEA RCT Registry. February 22. https://doi.org/10.1257/rct.8990-1.1
Sponsors & Partners

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information
Experimental Details

Interventions

Intervention(s)
We will run the survey on the Facebook platform. Users will receive an invitation to participate in a survey. If users accept the terms and conditions, we will then elicit their valuations for Facebook using DBDC. They will first be asked if they would be willing to stop using Facebook for a month in exchange for an amount of money that will be randomized across users. Users who accept the first offer will be offered a smaller amount in the second round, and users who reject the first offer will be offered a higher amount (users will not be aware of this protocol to avoid strategic choices). For a small set of users, their responses will be taken into consideration and they will be offered the money they accepted in exchange for deactivating Facebook for a month. We will monitor their activation status and pay them the offered amount at the end of the 1 month period if they stay deactivated for the whole month.
We will then ask users hypothetical questions to separately elicit their valuations for Instagram and Whatsapp. These valuations will be elicited using the SBDC method, which uses a single question to users asking whether they would be willing to stop using the app in exchange for a random amount of money.
Finally, to contextualize these estimates, we will ask users hypothetical questions using BWS (best-worst scaling) to elicit their valuations for other digital goods such as Snapchat, Google Search, or YouTube. We will present users with a random subset of choices, where the combinations of choices are randomly chosen using a balanced-incomplete block design. Users will be asked to choose the best and worst options according to the BWS approach. Possible options could be: stop using Google Search for a month, earn $50 less for a month, and stop using Snapchat for a month.
Intervention Start Date
2022-02-28
Intervention End Date
2022-03-21

Primary Outcomes

Primary Outcomes (end points)
The main outcome of interest will be the value individuals across the 15 countries assign to Facebook. We will analyze how these valuations vary across subpopulations of respondents, such as country, age, gender, or education, etc. and how these valuations compare to users’ hypothetical valuations for other digital services such as WhatsApp, Instagram, Snapchat, or TikTok. We will calculate median valuations within groups of users using the methods described below.
Primary Outcomes (explanation)

Secondary Outcomes

Secondary Outcomes (end points)
Secondary Outcomes (explanation)

Experimental Design

Experimental Design
We will randomize participants into a set of groups that will be offered different initial offer values. The group with the lowest offer values can be seen as a control group, while those with higher offer values can be seen as treatment groups. In each group, users will first be asked if they would be willing to stop using Facebook for a month in exchange for a random amount of money within a subset of monetary values.

For more efficient data collection, users will be offered a second monetary value: users who accept the first offer will be offered a smaller amount in the second round, and users who reject the first offer will be offered a higher amount.

By comparing take-up rates across groups that received different offer values, we will estimate the median valuation that users in a sample place on Facebook.

An analogous approach will be used to estimate the median valuation that users in a sample place on Instagram and WhatsApp, except that this valuation will be based on hypothetical questions asked using an SBDC approach.
Experimental Design Details
Randomization Method
Randomization done by a computer
Randomization Unit
Individual
Was the treatment clustered?
No

Experiment Characteristics

Sample size: planned number of clusters
N/A
Sample size: planned number of observations
We expect to have responses from around 70,000 users across 15 countries.
Sample size (or number of clusters) by treatment arms
The total sample of 70,000 users will be evenly distributed across 9 initial offer values.
Minimum detectable effect size for main outcomes (accounting for sample design and clustering)
IRB

Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)

IRB Name
IRB Approval Date
IRB Approval Number

Post-Trial

Post Trial Information

Study Withdrawal

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information

Intervention

Is the intervention completed?
No
Data Collection Complete
Data Publication

Data Publication

Is public data available?
No

Program Files

Program Files
Reports, Papers & Other Materials

Relevant Paper(s)

Reports & Other Materials