Back to History

Fields Changed

Registration

Field Before After
Trial Status completed on_going
Abstract In this paper, we study contract enforcement in the illegal gambling market of Pakistan as gamblers make high-stakes betting decisions without the state enforcing contracts. Our experimental intervention randomly assigns gamblers with additional week to honor their book bets –a contract that allows them to pay back the week after and to a treatment arm that makes blacklisting from betting market salient in the contract. We observe the pattern of repayment by gamblers in absence of any state authority enforcing these contracts. We also investigate two potential mechanisms 1) black-listing in case of nonpayment 2) threat or actual violence in case of non-payment. Finally, we examine the impact of a much-used decision aid, odds and historical data relevant to the bet, to investigate whether reducing uncertainty about the outcome affect the decision to bet. We observe winnings and losses of gamblers and collect rich set of behavioral data in the form of strategic dilemmas on risk, confidence, cooperation and coordination. In this paper, we study contract enforcement in the illegal gambling market of Pakistan as gamblers make high-stakes betting decisions without the state enforcing contracts. Our experimental intervention randomly assigns gamblers with additional week to honor their book bets –a contract that allows them to pay back the week after and to a treatment arm that makes blacklisting from betting market salient in the contract. We observe the pattern of repayment by gamblers in absence of any state authority enforcing these contracts. We also investigate two potential mechanisms behind the blacklisting 1) imposition of reputational costs in case of nonpayment 2) collusion utilization in case of non-payment. The mechanism underpinning the blacklisting is evaluated via a factorial design: we rerandomize gamblers into a treatment arm that imposes reputation costs in event of non-payment or informs the collusion by informing the race “guild” about the non-repayment. Finally, we examine the impact of a much-used decision aid, odds and historical data relevant to the bet, to investigate whether reducing uncertainty about the outcome affect the decision to bet. We observe winnings and losses of gamblers, payback rates and collect rich set of behavioral data in the form of strategic dilemmas on risk, confidence, cooperation and coordination.
Trial Start Date March 05, 2022 April 17, 2022
Trial End Date March 06, 2022 May 08, 2022
Last Published April 20, 2022 04:50 PM May 03, 2022 04:12 AM
Intervention (Public) T1: Give an opportunity to sign a book bet contract with the gambler with additional time to payback (2 weeks to payback relative to status quo of one week repayment standard book bet contract) T2: Coalition Salience – Black listing clause embedded within the status quo book bet contract of payment the week after T3: Provide for free a decision aid containing odds and historical data relevant to bet embedded within the "handicap" decision aid C: Status quo - Opportunity to place a book bet with the status quo contract allowing to payback a week after and no decision-aid provided T1: Give an opportunity to sign a book bet contract with the gambler with additional time to payback (2 weeks to payback relative to status quo of one week repayment standard book bet contract) T2: Blacklisting Clause embedded within the status quo book bet contract of payment the week after. The mechanism underpinning the blacklisting is evaluated via a factorial design: T2a: Reputation Cost Imposed via making the "defaulters" public T2b: Collusion Utilization by informing the Race Club Guild. T2c: No Reputational Cost Imposed, Race Club Guild Not Informed. T3: Provide for free a decision aid containing odds and historical data relevant to bet embedded within the "handicap" decision aid C: Status quo - Opportunity to place a book bet with the status quo contract allowing to payback a week after and no decision-aid provided
Intervention Start Date March 05, 2022 April 17, 2022
Intervention End Date March 06, 2022 May 08, 2022
Experimental Design (Public) We will randomly allocate 16000 gamblers at the Annual Lahore Race Derby into four groups of 4000 gamblers each: T1: Give an opportunity to sign a book bet contract with the gambler with additional time to payback (2 weeks to payback relative to status quo of one week repayment standard book bet contract) T2: Coalition Salience – Black listing clause embedded within the status quo book bet contract of payment the week after T3: Provide for free a decision aid containing odds and historical data relevant to bet embedded within the "handicap" decision aid C: Status quo - Opportunity to place a book bet with the status quo contract allowing to payback a week after and no decision-aid provided We will randomly allocate 16000 gamblers at the Annual Lahore Race Derby into four groups of 4000 gamblers each: T1: Give an opportunity to sign a book bet contract with the gambler with additional time to payback (2 weeks to payback relative to status quo of one week repayment standard book bet contract) T2: Blacklisting Clause embedded within the status quo book bet contract of payment the week after. The mechanism underpinning the blacklisting is evaluated via a factorial design: T2a: Reputation Cost Imposed via making the "defaulters" public T2b: Collusion Utilization by informing the Race Club Guild. T2c: No Reputational Cost Imposed, Race Club Guild Not Informed. T3: Provide for free a decision aid containing odds and historical data relevant to bet embedded within the "handicap" decision aid C: Status quo - Opportunity to place a book bet with the status quo contract allowing to payback a week after and no decision-aid provided
Randomization Method Randomization done in office by a computer. Randomization done in office by a computer in Stata.
Planned Number of Clusters 16000 individual gamblers 16000 individual gamblers are given the opportunity to participate.
Planned Number of Observations 16000 16000
Back to top