Field
Trial Status
|
Before
completed
|
After
on_going
|
Field
Abstract
|
Before
In this paper, we study contract enforcement in the illegal gambling market of Pakistan as gamblers make high-stakes betting decisions without the state enforcing contracts. Our experimental intervention randomly assigns gamblers with additional week to honor their book bets –a contract that allows them to pay back the week after and to a treatment arm that makes blacklisting from betting market salient in the contract. We observe the pattern of repayment by gamblers in absence of any state authority enforcing these contracts. We also investigate two potential mechanisms 1) black-listing in case of nonpayment 2) threat or actual violence in case of non-payment. Finally, we examine the impact of a much-used decision aid, odds and historical data relevant to the bet, to investigate whether reducing uncertainty about the outcome affect the decision to bet. We observe winnings and losses of gamblers and collect rich set of behavioral data in the form of strategic dilemmas on risk, confidence, cooperation and coordination.
|
After
In this paper, we study contract enforcement in the illegal gambling market of Pakistan as gamblers make high-stakes betting decisions without the state enforcing contracts. Our experimental intervention randomly assigns gamblers with additional week to honor their book bets –a contract that allows them to pay back the week after and to a treatment arm that makes blacklisting from betting market salient in the contract. We observe the pattern of repayment by gamblers in absence of any state authority enforcing these contracts. We also investigate two potential mechanisms behind the blacklisting 1) imposition of reputational costs in case of nonpayment 2) collusion utilization in case of non-payment. The mechanism underpinning the blacklisting is evaluated via a factorial design: we rerandomize gamblers into a treatment arm that imposes reputation costs in event of non-payment or informs the collusion by informing the race “guild” about the non-repayment. Finally, we examine the impact of a much-used decision aid, odds and historical data relevant to the bet, to investigate whether reducing uncertainty about the outcome affect the decision to bet. We observe winnings and losses of gamblers, payback rates and collect rich set of behavioral data in the form of strategic dilemmas on risk, confidence, cooperation and coordination.
|
Field
Trial Start Date
|
Before
March 05, 2022
|
After
April 17, 2022
|
Field
Trial End Date
|
Before
March 06, 2022
|
After
May 08, 2022
|
Field
Last Published
|
Before
April 20, 2022 04:50 PM
|
After
May 03, 2022 04:12 AM
|
Field
Intervention (Public)
|
Before
T1: Give an opportunity to sign a book bet contract with the gambler with additional time to payback (2 weeks to payback relative to status quo of one week repayment standard book bet contract)
T2: Coalition Salience – Black listing clause embedded within the status quo book bet contract of payment the week after
T3: Provide for free a decision aid containing odds and historical data relevant to bet embedded within the "handicap" decision aid
C: Status quo - Opportunity to place a book bet with the status quo contract allowing to payback a week after and no decision-aid provided
|
After
T1: Give an opportunity to sign a book bet contract with the gambler with additional time to payback (2 weeks to payback relative to status quo of one week repayment standard book bet contract)
T2: Blacklisting Clause embedded within the status quo book bet contract of payment the week after. The mechanism underpinning the blacklisting is evaluated via a factorial design:
T2a: Reputation Cost Imposed via making the "defaulters" public
T2b: Collusion Utilization by informing the Race Club Guild.
T2c: No Reputational Cost Imposed, Race Club Guild Not Informed.
T3: Provide for free a decision aid containing odds and historical data relevant to bet embedded within the "handicap" decision aid
C: Status quo - Opportunity to place a book bet with the status quo contract allowing to payback a week after and no decision-aid provided
|
Field
Intervention Start Date
|
Before
March 05, 2022
|
After
April 17, 2022
|
Field
Intervention End Date
|
Before
March 06, 2022
|
After
May 08, 2022
|
Field
Experimental Design (Public)
|
Before
We will randomly allocate 16000 gamblers at the Annual Lahore Race Derby into four groups of 4000 gamblers each:
T1: Give an opportunity to sign a book bet contract with the gambler with additional time to payback (2 weeks to payback relative to status quo of one week repayment standard book bet contract)
T2: Coalition Salience – Black listing clause embedded within the status quo book bet contract of payment the week after
T3: Provide for free a decision aid containing odds and historical data relevant to bet embedded within the "handicap" decision aid
C: Status quo - Opportunity to place a book bet with the status quo contract allowing to payback a week after and no decision-aid provided
|
After
We will randomly allocate 16000 gamblers at the Annual Lahore Race Derby into four groups of 4000 gamblers each:
T1: Give an opportunity to sign a book bet contract with the gambler with additional time to payback (2 weeks to payback relative to status quo of one week repayment standard book bet contract)
T2: Blacklisting Clause embedded within the status quo book bet contract of payment the week after. The mechanism underpinning the blacklisting is evaluated via a factorial design:
T2a: Reputation Cost Imposed via making the "defaulters" public
T2b: Collusion Utilization by informing the Race Club Guild.
T2c: No Reputational Cost Imposed, Race Club Guild Not Informed.
T3: Provide for free a decision aid containing odds and historical data relevant to bet embedded within the "handicap" decision aid
C: Status quo - Opportunity to place a book bet with the status quo contract allowing to payback a week after and no decision-aid provided
|
Field
Randomization Method
|
Before
Randomization done in office by a computer.
|
After
Randomization done in office by a computer in Stata.
|
Field
Planned Number of Clusters
|
Before
16000 individual gamblers
|
After
16000 individual gamblers are given the opportunity to participate.
|
Field
Planned Number of Observations
|
Before
16000
|
After
16000
|