Gender Bias in Investment and Entrepreneurship in Ethiopia

Last registered on December 21, 2022
View Trial History

Pre-Trial

Trial Information

General Information

Title
Gender Bias in Investment and Entrepreneurship in Ethiopia
RCT ID
AEARCTR-0009064
Initial registration date
March 07, 2022

Initial registration date is when the trial was registered.

It corresponds to when the registration was submitted to the Registry to be reviewed for publication.

First published
March 10, 2022, 8:58 PM EST

First published corresponds to when the trial was first made public on the Registry after being reviewed.

Last updated
December 21, 2022, 3:53 AM EST

Last updated is the most recent time when changes to the trial's registration were published.

Locations

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information

Primary Investigator

Name
Sreelakshmi Papineni
Affiliation
World Bank
Contact Primary Investigator

Other Primary Investigator(s)

PI Name
Niklas Buehren
PI Affiliation
World Bank
Contact Investigator

Additional Trial Information

Status
On going
Start date
2021-10-25
End date
2023-12-31
Keywords
Firms & Productivity, Gender, Lab
Additional Keywords
JEL code(s)
Secondary IDs
Prior work
This trial does not extend or rely on any prior RCTs.
Abstract
This lab-in-the-field experiment will measure the gender bias in entrepreneurship and investment among youth and credit officers in Ethiopia. Chigign Tobiya “Ethiopia Emerges” is a television show in Ethiopia where entrepreneurs pitch their business ideas to a panel of business tycoons for a chance to get investment funding. Using actors and actresses we record mock business pitches that keep the business idea of the pitch constant but we vary the gender of the entrepreneur, gender sector stereotype, and pitch quality to examine whether there is a gender bias amongst male and female audience members. We also test the impacts of different content tweaks (entrepreneur backstories, role models, educational content) on gender attitudes and biases in entrepreneurship and investment decisions among youth and credit officers. In the experiment we randomize individuals to watch one of eight different combinations of video clips for 1,600 aspiring entrepreneurs (800 male and 800 female TVET students) and 200 credit officers (from a selected microfinance institution).
External Link(s)

Registration Citation

Citation
Buehren, Niklas and Sreelakshmi Papineni. 2022. "Gender Bias in Investment and Entrepreneurship in Ethiopia." AEA RCT Registry. December 21. https://doi.org/10.1257/rct.9064-1.1
Sponsors & Partners
Experimental Details

Interventions

Intervention(s)
In this study we worked with RENEW, an investment firm in Addis Ababa, who runs a TV business pitching show called Chigign Tobiya (similar to Dragon’s Den in the UK and Shark Tank in the US) to create mock clips that are loosely based on the TV show where entrepreneurs pitch their business ideas to a panel of business tycoons for a chance to get funding. Actors and actresses are used to pitch a business investment idea to the tycoons - the business idea stays constant but we vary gender, sector stereotypes, and pitch quality to examine whether there is a gender bias amongst audience members. Various add-ons to be tested: role model to frame perception of success, information about women in male-dominated sectors, and an emotional backstory. The study will involve randomly showing different video content to different groups to examine what is the gender bias in investment. The focus of this study will be on the opinion of credit officers who currently make investment decisions on entrepreneurial lending and youth who aspire to be entrepreneurs themselves.
Intervention Start Date
2021-10-25
Intervention End Date
2022-01-31

Primary Outcomes

Primary Outcomes (end points)
Whether they would invest in the business idea, whether they think the tycoons should invest in the business idea, amount they think the tycoons should invest, how they rate the success of the business, how they rate the entrepreneur overall, how they rate the entrepreneur's skills and knowledge, and whether they consider the entrepreneur to be a good negotiator, leader and manager in business.
Primary Outcomes (explanation)

Secondary Outcomes

Secondary Outcomes (end points)
Secondary Outcomes (explanation)

Experimental Design

Experimental Design
Individuals randomized to watch one of eight different combinations of video clips. The lab-in-the-field experiment will include data collection and video watching sessions for 1,600 aspiring entrepreneurs (800 male and 800 female TVET students) and 200 credit officers (from a selected MFI).
Experimental Design Details
Not available
Randomization Method
Randomization for MFI study sample completed on a computer prior to the study. Randomization for TVET study sample completed on the tablet after recruitment into the study.
Randomization Unit
Individual level randomization stratified by gender and field of study for TVET students study sample. Individual level randomization stratified by gender and position for MFI credit officers study sample.
Was the treatment clustered?
No

Experiment Characteristics

Sample size: planned number of clusters
Four TVET colleges and one MFI.
Sample size: planned number of observations
The lab-in-the-field experiment will include data collection and video watching sessions for 1,600 aspiring entrepreneurs (800 male and 800 female TVET students) and 200 credit officers (from a selected MFI). Individuals are randomized to watch one of eight different combinations of video clips.
Sample size (or number of clusters) by treatment arms
800 male students are randomized to watch one of eight different combinations of video clips (100 per arm). 800 female students are randomized to watch one of eight different combinations of video clips (100 per arm). 220 credit officers (male and female) are randomized to watch one of two different combinations of video clips (~100 per arm).
Minimum detectable effect size for main outcomes (accounting for sample design and clustering)
The randomization will be conducted at the individual level and stratified by gender and field of study. Power calculations were conducted to determine the minimum sample size required to detect a treatment effect of 20% over the control mean at 80% power. We assume the variation in outcome measure as the ratio of the standard deviation to the mean for both treatment and control group is calculated using a ratio of 0.5. Outcome – amount of investment level (max US$ 50,000). Mean investment for women US$ 35,000 and assume an effect size of 20% (i.e. 20% gender gap where control here is mean for men = US$ 42,000). This gives a recommended sample size of 99 observations per arm.
Supporting Documents and Materials
IRB

Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)

IRB Name
Health Media Lab (HML) IRB
IRB Approval Date
2021-09-02
IRB Approval Number
973TWBG21
Analysis Plan