Transforming School Climate by Harnessing Adolescent Demand for Autonomy

Last registered on July 31, 2024

Pre-Trial

Trial Information

General Information

Title
Transforming School Climate by Harnessing Adolescent Demand for Autonomy
RCT ID
AEARCTR-0009140
Initial registration date
March 25, 2022

Initial registration date is when the trial was registered.

It corresponds to when the registration was submitted to the Registry to be reviewed for publication.

First published
March 28, 2022, 7:12 AM EDT

First published corresponds to when the trial was first made public on the Registry after being reviewed.

Last updated
July 31, 2024, 12:38 PM EDT

Last updated is the most recent time when changes to the trial's registration were published.

Locations

Region

Primary Investigator

Affiliation
European University Institute

Other Primary Investigator(s)

Additional Trial Information

Status
Completed
Start date
2021-10-01
End date
2024-07-01
Secondary IDs
Prior work
This trial does not extend or rely on any prior RCTs.
Abstract
We evaluate an educational program that aims to improve the school climate in socioeconomically disadvantaged post-primary schools by leveraging adolescents’ natural demand for autonomy. The innovative nature of the intervention is that it aims to channel adolescents’ struggle for independence into the effort of transforming their schools’ climate. To do this, the intervention indirectly targets adolescents’ beliefs about their ability to control their own lives and influence their environment, i.e., their locus of control. This indirect targeting works by giving almost full autonomy to select adolescents (senior students), we refer to as “student teachers”, to convey the importance of these beliefs to their younger peers (junior students). This unique implementation style is expected to improve individual outcomes of both adolescents (student teachers and their close networks) and their younger peers. By internalizing what they teach, we expect the student teachers to take responsibility for transforming their surroundings, help mitigate bad behavior and establish good norms in their schools. We expect these changes to materialize through their improved internal locus of control. We also expect junior peers to be affected by these teachings directly and adopt good behavioral norms, and have improved internal locus of control.
We first selected student teachers based on their in-degree centrality in friendship networks, their popularity, and emotional intelligence scores. These select students were given a curriculum to cover one hour per week for 5 months in junior classes with mostly hands-off guidance from designated interns. The trial involves 65 middle schools in the Turkish province of Diyarbakir. Student teachers were chosen from grades 7 and 8 (senior years in middle school), and they teach 5th and 6th-grade students, respectively (junior years in middle school) in their own schools.
External Link(s)

Registration Citation

Citation
Alan, Sule. 2024. "Transforming School Climate by Harnessing Adolescent Demand for Autonomy." AEA RCT Registry. July 31. https://doi.org/10.1257/rct.9140-1.1
Sponsors & Partners

Sponsors

Experimental Details

Interventions

Intervention(s)
The intervention involves first selecting student teachers from all 65 schools based on their network centrality in friendship networks, their popularity, and emotional intelligence test scores. These student teachers then cover a specifically designed curriculum. The curriculum contains videos, activities, and games. The student teachers are given about 5 months to implement the sessions described in the curriculum. The endline data collection is scheduled for April-May 2022.

The intervention has 3 treatment arms: 1) Treatment with curriculum, 2) Placebo interactions, 3) Pure control.
Intervention (Hidden)
The intervention involves first selecting student teachers from all 65 schools based on their network centrality in friendship networks, their popularity, and emotional intelligence test scores. These student teachers then cover a specifically designed curriculum. The curriculum contains videos, activities, and games. The student teachers are given about 5 months to implement the sessions described in the curriculum. The endline data collection is scheduled for April-May 2022.

The intervention has 3 treatment arms: 1) Treatment with curriculum, 2) Placebo interactions, 3) Pure control.
Intervention Start Date
2021-11-01
Intervention End Date
2022-04-08

Primary Outcomes

Primary Outcomes (end points)
We will test the effectiveness of the program with respect to a wide range of outcomes. To construct our outcomes, we use five main data collection tools:


- Surveys
- Incentivized experiments
- Social networks
- Cognitive tests
- Administrative records
Primary Outcomes (explanation)
Our primary outcomes of interest can be grouped into five categories.

1) Incentivized games: We will design novel incentivized games to capture the desire to work for a community and the stance against anti-social behavior.

2) Cognitive Tests: We will conduct math and verbal tests in the class. The research team will prepare these tests based on the national curriculum of the relevant grade level. Performances in these tests will constitute our objective measures of math and verbal performances.

3) Administrative Records: These are official disciplinary referrals and absenteeism.

4) Social Networks: Friendship and support networks
5) Surveys: We will measure mental well-being, belongingness, behavioral norms

Secondary Outcomes

Secondary Outcomes (end points)
Our secondary outcomes are survey outcomes to explore the mechanism of change:

Internal and external locus of control
Impulsivity
Social confidence, sense of autonomy
Emotional intelligence
Secondary Outcomes (explanation)
Our secondary outcomes are survey outcomes to explore the mechanism of change:

Internal and external locus of control
Impulsivity
Social confidence, sense of autonomy
Emotional intelligence

Experimental Design

Experimental Design
We have 65 schools. We first assigned 32 schools to treatment and 33 to control by assigning 50% ex-ante probability to each status. 32 treatment schools are receiving the treatment. We then randomly assigned 33 control schools to two arms: Arm 1: placebo interactions arm (16 schools) and pure control arm (17 schools), again assigning 50% ex-ante probably to each arm. The placebo arm aims to rule out the effects that might stem from mere interaction between student teachers and juniors and therefore to pin down the pure effect of the content of the curriculum. The pure control serves as the policy-relevant control group as it represents the status-quo in Turkish middle schools.
Experimental Design Details
We have 65 schools. We first assigned 32 schools to treatment and 33 to control by assigning 50% ex-ante probability to each status. 32 treatment schools are receiving the treatment. We then randomly assigned 33 control schools to two arms: Arm 1: placebo interactions arm (16 schools) and pure control arm (17 schools), again assigning 50% ex-ante probably to each arm. The placebo arm aims to rule out the effects that might stem from mere interaction between student teachers and juniors and therefore to pin down the pure effect of the content of the curriculum. The pure control serves as the policy relevant control group as it represents the status-quo in Turkish middle schools.
Randomization Method
Randomization was done in office by a computer using Stata
Randomization Unit
School
Was the treatment clustered?
Yes

Experiment Characteristics

Sample size: planned number of clusters
65 schools
Sample size: planned number of observations
The sample includes a total of 22,700 officially registered students (baseline).
Sample size (or number of clusters) by treatment arms
32 schools are assigned to treatment, 33 to control. Among the control, 16 is assigned to placebo treatment, 17 to pure control.
Minimum detectable effect size for main outcomes (accounting for sample design and clustering)
Power calculations are presented in our PAP
IRB

Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)

IRB Name
EUI Ethics Board and Bilkent University Ethics Board
IRB Approval Date
2021-08-17
IRB Approval Number
N/A
Analysis Plan

Analysis Plan Documents

Pre-Analysis Plan for Transforming School Climate

MD5: e1c5f00726c8d08c1955c2cc7a46268d

SHA1: 4b15d2482af54764bc1df7bde1a8a72a29f4c2c0

Uploaded At: March 25, 2022

Post-Trial

Post Trial Information

Study Withdrawal

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information

Intervention

Is the intervention completed?
No
Data Collection Complete
Data Publication

Data Publication

Is public data available?
No

Program Files

Program Files
Reports, Papers & Other Materials

Relevant Paper(s)

Reports & Other Materials