Back to History

Fields Changed

Registration

Field Before After
Last Published October 20, 2022 11:25 AM October 26, 2022 12:09 PM
Planned Number of Observations 6 treatments, 175 individuals per treatment, 20 observations from each individual = 21,000 observations 6 treatments, 175-185 individuals per treatment, 20 observations from each individual = >21,000 observations
Sample size (or number of clusters) by treatment arms 175 individuals per treatment 185 individuals per treatment in computerised environments
Power calculation: Minimum Detectable Effect Size for Main Outcomes The study is powered for equivalence tests of bidder surplus, auctioneer's revenue, and welfare (all logged values), between the Product-Mix and the sequential auction format in the computerised bidding environment, respectively. The hypothesied effect is therefore zero. The maximum pooled standard deviation for the outcomes in questions is 0.956 (logged utility). I choose a significance level of 0.05 and equivalence bounds of 20%. Power calulations (sample sizes) are presented in the pre-analysis plan for a power of 0.8 and 0.9 and for various scenarios of within-subject correlation. Choosing a sample size of 175 subjects per treatment conservatively allows for a serial correlation between rounds of up to 0.4. This is assumed to be a strict upper bound based on related experimental designs in the literature. The treatments with only human bidders are for exploratory analysis only, hence the sample size will be lower. The study is powered for pairwise equivalence tests between all considered auction formats in the computerised bidding environment, concerning the outcomes of bidder surplus, auctioneer's revenue, and welfare (all absolute values), respectively. The hypothesied effect is therefore zero. I choose a significance level of 0.05 and equivalence bounds of +/- 20% of the pooled standard deviation corresponding to each pairwise comparison. Power calulations (sample sizes) are presented in the pre-analysis plan for a power of 0.8 and 0.9 and for various scenarios of within-subject correlation. Choosing a sample size of 185 subjects per treatment conservatively allows for a serial correlation between rounds of up to 0.4. This is assumed to be a strict upper bound based on related experimental designs in the literature. The treatments with only human bidders are for exploratory analysis only, hence the sample size will be lower.
Back to top